Skip to main content

Analogies in Scientific Explanations: Concept Formation by Analogies in Cultural Evolutionary Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 25))

Abstract

In philosophy of science, concept formation and reduction is usually discussed with respect to definability. In the paper at hand this discussion is slightly expanded to an investigation of concept formation and reduction by analogies. It is argued that many kinds of such analogies bear some important features of partial contextual definitions. With the help of a detailed investigation of the so-called gene-meme-analogy it is then demonstrated how the “meme” concept is introduced via analogies into an expanded theory of (cultural) evolution. As a consequence it is shown that the diversity of meanings of the ‘meme’ concept fits into the current state of establishing this analogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The shortest description of \({{s}_{1}}\) within the description system is \(val(0)=0;val( 0' )=1;val( n'' )=\text{}\!\!\tilde{\ }\!\!\text{ }( val(n)\text{}\!\!\And\!\!\text{}val({{n}'} ) )\); with the length 46. The shortest description of \({{s}_{2}}\) within this description system is \(val(0)=0;val( {{n}'} )=\text{ }\!\!\tilde{\ }\!\!\text{}val(n)\); with the length 25. So \({{s}_{1}}\) is more complex than \({{s}_{2}}\).

References

  • Aunger, R. ed. 2000. Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. J. 1999. The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype. The long reach of the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. 1992. Consciousness explained. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distin, K. 2005. The selfish meme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. 1970. Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeng, B., R. Mathisen, and J.-A. Johnsen. 2007. Why do blue-eyed men prefer women with the same eye color? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61 (3): 371–384. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0266-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M., and M. Bunge. 1997. Foundations of biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., A. Whiten, and K. N. Laland. 2006. Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:329–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. 2011.Evolution in Natur und Kultur. Eine Einführung in die verallgemeinerte Evolutionstheorie. (Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.) http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-3-8274-2665-9. Accessed 21 July 2013.

  • Sober, E. 2000. Philosophy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitányi, P. M. B., et al. 2008. Normalized information distance. In Information theory and statistical learning, eds. F. Emmert-Streib and M. Dehmer, 39–71. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian J. Feldbacher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feldbacher, C. (2014). Analogies in Scientific Explanations: Concept Formation by Analogies in Cultural Evolutionary Theory. In: Ribeiro, H. (eds) Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy. Argumentation Library, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics