Abstract
The track structure created by radiolysis depends on many factors such as the type of ionising radiation used and the initial kinetic energy of this radiation. As such radiolysis gives rise to a complicated spatial arrangement. During the passage of the radiation several radical ion pairs are born in the same spatial region, which can either undergo geminate or cross-recombination. It is considered that all geminate pairs are initially singlet-correlated (optical approximation), although the production of triplet ion-pairs is also possible through low-energy electron ionisation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The acronym ERP is used in this chapter to avoid any confusion with the acronym EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance).
- 2.
This formula assumes that fluorescence occurs almost instantaneously and can therefore only be used in the tail of the recombination probability distribution.
- 3.
In the semiclassical approximation the electron spin on each radical is treated quantum mechanically, whilst the nuclear spins are treated classically. The unpaired electron precesses about the static field and the resultant of the nuclear spins.
- 4.
This assumption will be utilised to simplify the computational model.
- 5.
This method does have the disadvantage that the coherences between the triplet spin states are not retained.
- 6.
In this simulation spin relaxation was modelled to a uniform distribution.
- 7.
It is important to note that the IRT algorithm does overestimate cross-recombination when the spur structure is in a linear arrangement.
- 8.
Experimental and simulated TR MFE curve shown were extracted from reference [34].
- 9.
Experimental and simulated TR MFE curve shown were extracted from reference [34].
References
B. Brocklehurst, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 50, 213 (1997)
J.A. LaVerne, B. Brocklehurst, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 47, 71 (1996)
B. Brocklehurst, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 4, 279 (1985)
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1951)
J. Klein, R. Voltz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1214 (1976)
B. Brocklehurst, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 21, 577 (1983)
V.A. Bagryansky, V.I. Borovkov, Y.N. Molin, Russ. Chem. Rev. 76, 493 (2007)
D.V. Stass, B.M. Tadjikov, Y.N. Molin, Chem. Phys. Letts. 235, 511 (1995)
V.A. Bagryansky, O.M. Usov, V.I. Borokov, Chem. Phys. 255, 237 (2000)
K. Schulten, P.G. Wolynes, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 3292 (1978)
E.W. Knapp, K. Schulten, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 1878 (1979)
V.I. Borovkov, Y.N. Molin, Phys. Chem. 396, 123 (2004)
D.M. Bartels, R.G. Lawler, A.D. Trifunac, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 2686 (1985)
B.M. Tadjikov, D.V. Stass, Y.N. Molin, J. Phys. Chem. A. 101, 377 (1997)
V.I. Borovkov, Y.N. Molin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 2119 (2004)
V.I. Borovkov, Y.N. Molin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 398, 422 (2004)
M.R. Das, S.B. Wagner, J.H. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 5404 (1970)
J.H. Freed, R.G. Kooser, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 4715 (1968)
H.M. McConnell, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 13 (1961)
D. Kivelson, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 13 (1966)
P.V. Schastnev, L.N. Shchegoleva, Molecular Distortions in Ionic and Excited States (CRC, Boca Raton, 1995)
A. Lund, M. Lindgren, S. Lunell, J. Maruani, Molecules in Physics, Chemistry and Biology (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989)
V.I. Melekhov, O.A. Anisimov, L. Sjoqvist, A. Lund, Chem. Phys. Lett. 174, 95 (1990)
B. Brocklehurst, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 78, 303 (1984)
L.V. Il’ichov, S.V. Anishchik, J. Phys. B. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 1 (2009)
A. Mozumder, Fundamentals of Radiation Chemistry (Academic Press, London, 1999)
M. Wojcik, W.M. Bartczak, J. Kroh, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 39, 65 (1992)
W.M. Bartczak, A. Hummel, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 27, 71 (1996)
O.A. Anisimov, V.M. Grigoryants, Y.N. Molin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 74, 15 (1980)
A. Saeki, T. Kozawa, Y. Yoshida, S. Tagawa, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 60, 319 (2001)
V.I. Borovkov, S.V. Anishchik, O.A. Anisimov, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 67, 639 (2003)
R. Mehnert, O. Brede, W. Naumann, R. Herman, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 32, 325 (1988)
V.I. Borovkov, S.V. Anishchik, O.A. Anisimov, Chem. Phys. Lett. 270, 327 (1997)
V.I. Borovkov, K.A. Velizhanin, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76, 998 (2007)
V.I. Borovkov, K.A. Velizhanin, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76, 988 (2007)
V.I. Borovkov, High Energy Chem. 42, 113 (2008)
B. Brocklehurst, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88, 167 (1992)
B. Brocklehurst, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88, 2823 (1992)
A.K. Pikaev, Modern Radiation Chemistry: Radiolysis of Gases and Liquids (Nauka, Moscow, 1986)
F.P. Schwarz, D. Smith, S.G. Lias, P.J. Ausloos, Chem. Phys. 75, 3800 (1981)
G. Grampp, S. Landgraf, J. Rasmussen, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1897 (1999)
J. Telo, G. Grampp, M.C.B.L. Shohoji, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 99 (1999)
S.D. Traytak, M. Tachiya, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9907 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agarwal, A. (2014). Correlation Between Spin Entanglement and the Spin Relaxation Time. In: Simulation Studies of Recombination Kinetics and Spin Dynamics in Radiation Chemistry. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06272-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06272-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06271-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06272-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)