Skip to main content

Discovering and Navigating a Collection of Process Models Using Multiple Quality Dimensions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 171))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process discovery algorithms typically aim at discovering a process model from an event log that best describes the recorded behavior. However, multiple quality dimensions can be used to evaluate a process model. In previous work we showed that there often is not one single process model that describes the observed behavior best in all quality dimensions. Therefore, we present an extension to our flexible ETM algorithm that does not result in a single best process model but in a collection of mutually non-dominating process models. This is achieved by constructing a Pareto front of process models. We show by applying our approach on a real life event log that the resulting collection of process models indeed contains several good candidates. Furthermore, by presenting a collection of process models, we show that it allows the user to investigate the different trade-offs between different quality dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ProM is available for download from http://www.processmining.org/, the ETM algorithm is included in the ‘EvolutionaryTreeMiner’ package.

  2. 2.

    More information about the CoSeLoG project can be found at http://www.win.tue.nl/coselog/.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Awad, A., Decker, G., Weske, M.: Efficient compliance checking using BPMN-Q and temporal logic. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bui, L.T., Essam, D., Abbass, H.A., Green, D.: Performance analysis of evolutionary multi-objective optimization methods in noisy environments. In: Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, pp. 29–39 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: On the role of fitness, precision, generalization and simplicity in process discovery. In: Meersman, R., Panetto, H., Dillon, T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Dadam, P., Zhou, X., Pearson, S., Ferscha, A., Bergamaschi, S., Cruz, I.F. (eds.) OTM 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 305–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buijs, J.C.A.M., La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Improving business process models using observed behavior. In: Cudre-Mauroux, P., Ceravolo, P., Gašević, D. (eds.) SIMPDA 2012. LNBIP, vol. 162, pp. 44–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization. In: Burke, E.K., Kendall, G. (eds.) Search Methodologies, pp. 273–316. Springer, US (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Schoenauer, M., Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Yao, X., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schwefel, H.P. (eds.) PPSN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1917, pp. 849–858. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: An algorithm for business process compliance. In: JURIX, pp. 186–191 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hiroyasu, T., Nakayama, S., Miki, M.: Comparison study of SPEA2\(+\), SPEA2, and NSGA-II in diesel engine emissions and fuel economy problem. In: The 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2005, vol. 1, pp. 236–242 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pareto, V.: Cours D’Economie Politique, vols. I and II. F. Rouge, Lausanne (1896)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pika, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Fidge, C.J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wynn, M.T.: Predicting deadline transgressions using event logs. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 211–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raisanen, L., Whitaker, R.M.: Comparison and evaluation of multiple objective genetic algorithms for the antenna placement problem. Mob. Netw. Appl. 10(1–2), 79–88 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramezani Taghiabadi, E., Fahland, D., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Diagnostic information for compliance checking of temporal compliance requirements. In: Salinesi, C., Norrie, M.C., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7908, pp. 304–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suriadi, S., Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Root cause analysis with enriched process logs. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 174–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Evolutionary computation and convergence to a pareto front. In: Late Breaking Papers at the Genetic Programming 1998 Conference, pp. 221–228 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wynn, M.T., Low, W.Z., Nauta, W.: A framework for cost-aware process management: generation of accurate and timely management accounting cost reports. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the EUROGEN2001 Conference: Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control with Application to Industrial Problems, Athens, Greece, 19–21 September 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. A. M. Buijs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2014). Discovering and Navigating a Collection of Process Models Using Multiple Quality Dimensions. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06256-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06257-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics