Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 550 Accesses

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 213))

Abstract

In this chapter, the leading questions of this research are introduced. Beginning with some remarks concerning the fact that, in Husserl’s texts as well as in the literature commenting these texts, the analyses concerning time and space are more often than not kept separate from one another, the question as to how we shall conceive of their relationship is formulated. After introducing the interpretation of the relationship between spatiality and temporality in terms of analogies and parallelisms, which Husserl defends in some of his texts, I briefly expose my suggestion that such an understanding may be unsatisfactory both with respect to the description of such a relationship and with respect to the thematization of its role within experience. Consequently, following one insight of Husserl’s regarding the spatio-temporal configuration of experience, the hypothesis is formulated that the relationship between spatiality and temporality could be better understood as “intertwining”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An exception to the tendency of keeping separate the phenomenological analyses of space and time is represented by Richir and Welton. From two different perspectives, both authors thematize the interweaving of lived spatiality and temporality. More precisely, Richir conceives of this interweaving as the relation between temporal affectivity and the transcendence of space in the light of what he calls “phenomenological schematism”. According to Richir (1989, 2006), the reference to spatiality avoids the aporia of a merely formal account of temporality. Welton (2002), on the other hand, stresses the co-originality of spatiality and temporality with regard to the kinesthetic and temporalizing experience of the bodily subject. His argument comes in many ways close to the one I will make in the last chapter of this book. Also, Larrabee (1989, 1994) addresses the problem of the relationship between space and time. Yet, primarily focusing on formalized space and time, her view differs from the one adopted in this book.

  2. 2.

    Hua XIX/1, p. 267/(Husserl 2001c, p. 25).

  3. 3.

    Hua XIX/1, p. 270/(Husserl 2001c, p. 27).

  4. 4.

    Hua III/1, pp. 347–348/(Husserl 1983, pp. 360–362).

  5. 5.

    Hua IV, pp. 21–24/(Husserl 1989, pp. 23–26). See also Hua XVI, pp. 341–346/(Husserl 1997, pp. 297–302).

  6. 6.

    Hua XVI, p. 66/(Husserl 1997, p. 55).

  7. 7.

    “But here we must not overlook spatiotemporal configuration […]. It is prior to space and time themselves insofar as these are understood as identical persistent forms within which (as the form of space demands) all objects are spatial, are in their places, having a situation, by virtue of their spatial shape; as object determining, this configuration is “spatial form in situation” – and (as the form of time demands) within which all times are durations, peculiar to the objects as determinations.” (Husserl 1946, p. 337)/(Husserl 1981b, p. 246).

  8. 8.

    (Husserl 1946, p. 333)/(Husserl 1981b, p. 244).

  9. 9.

    On the archaeological and genealogical character of Husserl’s inquiries, see Bégout (2000b) and Pradelle (2000).

  10. 10.

    Hua XVI, p. 65/(Husserl 1997, p. 55).

References

  • Bégout, Bruce. 2000. La généalogie de la logique. Husserl, l’antéprédicatif et le catégorial. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1946. Die Welt der Lebendigen Gegenwart und die Konstitution der außerleiblichen Umwelt. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6(3): 323–343. [Husserl, Edmund. 1981. The world of the living present and the constitution of the surrounding world external to the organism. In Edmund Husserl, Shorter works, ed. Peter McCormick and Frederick A. Elliston, 238–250. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, ed. Marly Biemel. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (Hua IV). [Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book. Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907, ed. Ulrich Claesges. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (Hua XVI). [Husserl, Edmund. 1997. Thing and Space. Lectures of 1907. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz. Dordrecht: Kluwer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1974. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft, ed. Paul Janssen. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (Hua XVII).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, ed. Karl Schuhmann. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (Hua III/1). [Husserl, Edmund. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. Fred Kersten. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, ed. Ursula Panzer. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (Hua XIX/1). [Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical Investigations. Second Volume. Investigations III, IV, V, VI. Trans. John Niemeyer Findlay. London/New York: Routledge.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, Mary Jeanne. 1989. Time and spatial models: Temporality in Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3(3): 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, Mary Jeanne. 1994. Inside time consciousness: Diagramming the flux. Husserl Studies 10(3): 181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradelle, Dominique. 2000. L’archéologie du monde. Constitution de l’espace, idéalisme et intuitionnisme chez Husserl. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richir, Marc. 1989. Synthèse passive et temporalisation/spatialisation. In Husserl, ed. Marc Richir and Eliane Escoubas, 9–41. Grenoble: Millon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richir, Marc. 2006. Fragments phénoménologiques sur le temps et l’espace. Paris: Millon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welton, Donn. 2002. Zur Räumlichkeit des Bewusstseins. In Die erscheinende Welt. Festschrift für Klaus Held, ed. Heinrich Hüni and Peter Trawny, 623–649. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Summa, M. (2014). Introduction. In: Spatio-temporal Intertwining. Phaenomenologica, vol 213. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06236-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics