Abstract
Both approaches independently were successful and yielded accurate values. In this chapter, the results of both approaches are compared in order to ascertain whether they agree within the estimated uncertainties. The second issue of this chapter is then related to the implication for the KATRIN experiment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Fischer S, Sturm M, Schlösser M, Bornschein B, Drexlin G, Priester F, Lewis RJ, Telle HH (2011) Monitoring of tritium purity during long-term circulation in the KATRIN test experiment LOOPINO using laser Raman spectroscopy. Fusion Sci Technol 60(3):925–930
Rupp S (2012) Proof of concept of a calibration method for the laser Raman system for KATRIN based on the determination of the system’s spectral sensitivity. Diploma thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Schwartz C, Le Roy RJ (1987) Nonadiabatic eigenvalues and adiabatic matrix elements for all sotopes of diatomic hydrogen. J Mol Spectrosc 121:420–439
Sturm M (2010) Aufbau und Test des Inner-Loop-Systems der Tritiumquelle von KATRIN. Phd thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlösser, M. (2014). Comparison of Calibration Methods. In: Accurate Calibration of Raman Systems. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06221-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06221-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06220-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06221-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)