The Paradox Theory

  • Jan Willem WielandEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)


In this chapter, it is explained for what purposes an infinite regress argument can be used, and how an infinite regress argument should be evaluated, according to the Paradox Theory.


Philosophy Infinite Regress Argument Schema Vicious Paradox Reason 


  1. Aikin, S.F. 2011. Epistemology and the regress problem. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Beth, E.W. 1952. The prehistory of research into foundations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3: 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, O. 1996. Infinite regress arguments and infinite regresses. Acta Analytica 16: 95–124.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, R. 2008. Turtles all the way down: regress, priority and fundamentality. Philosophical Quarterly 58: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, M. 2002. Paradoxes from A to Z. 2nd ed. 2007. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, R. 1988. Vicious infinite regress arguments. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cling, A.D. 2008. The epistemic regress problem. Philosophical Studies 140: 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cling, A.D. 2009. Reasons, regresses and tragedy: the epistemic regress problem and the problem of the criterion. American Philosophical Quarterly 46: 333–346.Google Scholar
  9. Day, T.J. 1986. Infinite regress arguments. Some metaphysical and epistemological problems. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  10. Day, T.J. 1987. Infinite regress arguments. Philosophical Papers 16: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamut, L.T.F. 1982. Introduction to logic. In Logic, language and meaning. Vol. 1, Trans. 1991. Chicago: UCP.Google Scholar
  12. Gettier, E.L. 1965. Review of Passmore’s philosophical reasoning. Philosophical Review 2: 266–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gratton, C. 1997. What is an infinite regress argument? Informal Logic 18: 203–224.Google Scholar
  14. Gratton, C. 2009. Infinite regress arguments. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacquette, D. 1996. Adversus adversus regressum (against infinite regress objections). Journal of Speculative Philosophy 10: 92–104.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, P.D. 1999. Human knowledge and the infinite regress of reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 297–325.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, P.D. 2003. When infinite regresses are not vicious. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 718–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein, P.D. 2007. Human knowledge and the infinite progress of reasoning. Philosophical Studies 134: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, D.K. 1983. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maurin, A.-S. 2007. Infinite regress: virtue or vice? In Hommage à Wlodek, eds. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen et al., 1–26. Lund University.Google Scholar
  21. Maurin, A.-S. 2013. Infinite regress arguments. In Johanssonian investigations, eds. C. Svennerlind et al., 421–438. Heusenstamm: Ontos.Google Scholar
  22. Nolan, D. 2001. What’s wrong with infinite regresses? Metaphilosophy 32: 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nolt, J., D. Rohatyn and A. Varzi 1988. Theory and problems of logic. 2nd ed. 1998. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Oppy, G. 2006. Philosophical perspectives on infinity. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orilia, F. 2006. States of affairs: Bradley vs. Meinong. Meinong Studies 2: 213–238.Google Scholar
  26. Peijnenburg, J. 2010. Ineffectual foundations. Mind 119: 1125–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Post, J.F. 1993. Infinite regress argument. In A companion to epistemology, eds. J. Dancy et al., 2nd ed. 2010, 447–450. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Rescher, N. 2010. Infinite regress. The theory and history of a prominent mode of philosophical argumentation. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  29. Rescorla, M. 2014. Can perception halt the regress of justifications? In Ad infinitum. New essays on epistemological infinitism, eds. J. Turri and P. D. Klein, chap. 10. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, B. 1903. The principles of mathematics. 2nd ed. 1937. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  31. Sainsbury, R.M. 1987. Paradoxes. 3rd ed. 2009. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  32. Sanford, D.H. 1975. Infinity and vagueness. Philosophical Review 84: 520–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanford, D.H. 1984. Infinite regress arguments. In Principles of philosophical reasoning, ed. J.H. Fetzer, 93–117. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
  34. Schlesinger, G.N. 1983. Metaphysics. Methods and problems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Wieland, J.W. 2012. And so on. Two theories of regress arguments in philosophy. Ph.D. dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
  36. Wieland, J.W. 2013. Infinite regress arguments. Acta Analytica 28: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yalden-Thomson, D.C. 1964. Remarks about philosophical refutations. Monist 48: 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations