Advertisement

Introduction

  • Jan Willem WielandEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the topic of infinite regress arguments, presents an overview of classic cases, and explains what we should expect from theories about such arguments.

Keywords

Philosophy Infinite Regress Argument Schema Vicious Metaphilosophy Logic Methodology 

References

  1. Amico, R.P. 1993. The problem of the criterion. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, T. 1952. Summa theologica. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1925. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baggini, J., and P.S. Fosl. 2003. The philosopher’s toolkit. 2nd ed. 2010. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Blackburn, S. 1994. Regress. Oxford dictionary of philosophy. 2nd ed. 2005. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, F.H. 1893. Appearance and reality. 2nd ed. 1897. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, L. 1895. What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chisholm, R.M. 1982. The foundations of knowing. Minneapolis: MUP.Google Scholar
  9. Daly, C. 2010. Introduction to philosophical methods. Peterborough: Broadview.Google Scholar
  10. Gendler, T.Z. 2000. Thought experiment. On the powers and limits of imaginary cases. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  11. Häggqvist, S. 1996. Thought experiments in philosophy. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  12. Hume, D. 1748. An enquiry concerning human understanding, eds. Selby-Bigge L.A. and Nidditch P.H. 3rd ed. 1975. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  13. Hurwicz, L. 2008. But who will guard the guardians? American Economic Review 98: 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Juvenal. 1992. The satires. Trans. N. Rudd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lammenranta, M. 2008. The Pyrrhonian problematic. In The Oxford handbook of skepticism, ed. J. Greco, 9–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, M. (ed.). 2007. The Cambridge companion to atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McTaggart, J.E. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind 17: 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Plato. 1996. Parmenides. Trans. M.L. Gill & P. Ryan. Indianapolis: Hackett. Google Scholar
  19. Rosenberg, J.F. 1978. The practice of philosophy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Russell, B. 1903. The principles of mathematics. 2nd ed. 1937. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. Chicago: UCP.Google Scholar
  22. Sextus Empiricus. 1996. Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Trans. B. Mates. The skeptic way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sorensen, R.A. 1992. Thought experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stern, R. 2011. Transcendental arguments. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. Google Scholar
  25. Tarski, A. 1944. The semantic conception of truth, and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4: 341–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tolhurst, W. 1995. Vicious regress. In Cambridge dictionary of philosophy, ed. R. Audi, 2nd ed. 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wieland, J.W. 2013a. Infinite regress arguments. Acta Analytica 28: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wieland, J.W. 2013b. Strong and weak regress arguments. Logique and Analyse 224: 439–461.Google Scholar
  29. Wieland, J.W. 2013c. What Carroll’s tortoise actually proves. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 983–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wieland, J.W. 2014. Access and the shirker problem. American Philosophical Quarterly. Google Scholar
  31. Williamson, T. 2007. The philosophy of philosophy. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe et al. 4th ed. 2009. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations