Skip to main content

Strategic Facilitation of the Climate Decision Making Process: Leadership and Coordination as Basis for Long-Term Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Strategic Facilitation of Complex Decision-Making

Abstract

The complexity of climate change determines not only the pool of possible outcomes, but also limits the number of ways in which outcomes can be achieved (see Chap. 5). The multiplicity of actors, issues, structures, processes and outcomes in the climate change context unleashes self-enforcing political dynamics that debar traditional means of decision-making. As Peter Haas (2008) observes, general models of global decision-making are not likely to work for climate change leading to rather disappointing diplomatic efforts so far. Conventional means of decision-making, such as through leadership and multilateral diplomacy, seems to need a general overhaul, and at worst should be replaced. As the failure to re-assess generically applied decision-making instruments may cause even further problems, new commitments and innovative means of cooperation should be found to push forward the negotiation process.

“Learning without thought is labor lost; though without learning is perilous” (Confucius)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrim, Lance, and James Sebenius. 1992. “Formal Individual Mediation and the Negotiator’s Dilemma: Tommy Koh at the Law of the Sea Conference.” In Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management, edited by J. Bercovitch and Jeffrey Rubin, 97–130. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, Heike, Kai Konrad, and Marcel Thum. 2011. “Adaptation, Mitigation and Risk-Taking in Climate Policy”. CESifo Working Papers No. 3320, 1/2011. Dresden: TU Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashmakov, Igor. 2009. “Resource of Energy Efficiency in Russia: Scale, Costs, and Benefits.” Energy Efficiency 2: 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, Jacob. 2009. “Mediation and Conflict Resolution.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk, and I. William Zartman, 340–357. London: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, Charlotte, and John Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. 2nd Edition. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Chris. 2012. “China Bans Airlines from Joining EU Emissions Scheme.” Reuters, February 6. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/06/us-china-eu-emissions-idUSTRE81500V20120206.

  • Byun, J.R. 2010. “A Study on the Policy Network of Climate Change Policy: Case Study of the Introduction of Emission Trading System in Korea.” Korean Energy Economic Review 9 (1): 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, Peter. 1986. “Strategic Choice in Mediation.” Negotiation Journal 2: 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cede, Franz. 2009. “The Settlement of International Disputes by Legal Means - Arbitration and Judicial Settlement.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk, and I. William Zartman, 358–375. London: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Robin. 2009. “Surprise Guest Raises Hot Issue.” The Strait Times. http://www.straitstimes.com/STI/STIMEDIA/sp/apec2009/16112009_surprise_guest_raises_hot_issue.html.

  • Christoff, Peter. 2006. “Post-Kyoto? Post-Bush? Towards an Effective ‘Climate Coalition of the Willing’.” International Affairs 82 (5): 831–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, Larry, and I. William Zartman. 2003. “Multilateral Negotiation and the Management of Complexity.” International Negotiation 8 (1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. “The Environmental Challenge of EU Enlargement in Central and Eastern Europe.” http://www.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/2001/87-7972-044-7/html/default_eng.htm.

  • Depledge, Joanna. 2005. The Organization of Global Negotiations: Constructing the Climate Change Regime. London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, Christophe. 1994. “Coalition Theory: Using Power to Build Cooperation.” In International Multilateral Negotiations, edited by I. William Zartman, 148–177. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, Ole. 2007. “The European Union as a Leader in International Multilateral Negotiations -a Problematic Aspiration?” International Relations 21 (4): 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “What Is the EU Doing About Climate Change”. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/brief/eu/index_en.htm.

  • Falkner, Robert. 2007. “The Political Economy of Normative Power Europe: EU Environmental Leadership in International Biotechnology Regulation.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gensberg, Alexis. 2003. “United Nations Treaty Facilitators: A Proposal to Improve Environmental Treaty Making.” In Negotiating a Sustainable Future: Innovations in International Environmental Negotiations, edited by William Moomaw, Lawrence Susskind, and Kristen Kurczak, 12:79–94. Cambridge, MA: PON Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GNESD. 2007. “Reaching the Millennium Development Goals and Beyond: Access to Modern Forms of Energy as a Prerequisite”. Roskilde, Denmark: Global Network on Energy for Sustainable Development (GNESD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenleer, Martijn, and Louise van Schaik. 2007. “United We Stand? The European Union’s International Actorness in the Cases of the ICC and the Kyoto Protocol.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (5): 969–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Joyeeta, and Michael Grubb, ed. 2000. Climate Change and European Leadership. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Joyeeta, and Lasse Ringuis. 2001. “The EU’s Climate Leadership: Reconciling Ambition and Reality.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1 (2): 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. “Climate Change Governance After Bali.” Global Environmental Politics 8: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie Des Kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. Band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, P. Terrence. 1996. The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Richard. 1996. Social Identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Beyond Hegemony. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, Bert, and Ole Elgström. 2010. “Still a Green Leader? The European Union’s Role in International Climate Negotiations.” Cooperation and Conflict 45 (3): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, Christopher. 1973. The World in Depression: 1929–1939. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36 (2): 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1983a. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jae-Hyup, John Leitner, and Minjung Chung. 2012. “The Road to Doha through Seoul: The Diplomatic and Legal Implications of the Pre-COP18 Ministerial Meeting.” Journal of Korean Law 12: 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Hongmei. 2013. “EU to Fine Eight Chinese Airlines for Defying EU’s Emission Scheme.” China Economic Net, May 22. http://en.ce.cn/Business/ceex/201305/21/t20130521_24404520.shtml.

  • Malnes, Raino. 1995. “Leader and Entrepreneur in International Negotiations: A Conceptual Analysis.” European Journal of International Relations 1 (1): 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Elena, and Randall Stone. 2012. “The Kyoto-Protocol: Two-level Bargaining and European Integration.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1) (March): 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer, Irving, and Amber Leonard, ed. 1994. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Christopher. 1996. The Mediation Process. Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. Second Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T., S. Kelley, and F. Orton. 2012. “A Literature Review of Economic Studies on Carbon Pricing and Australian Wholesale Electricity Markets.” Energy Policy 49: 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NETL. 2010. “Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada, Third Edition”. US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlas/index.html.

  • Nye, Joseph. 2010. “Smart Power for Global Climate Negotiations | Climate Science and Policy.” Climate Science & Policy. June 28. http://www.climatescienceandpolicy.eu/2010/06/smart-power-for-global-climate-negotiations/.

  • Oberthür, S., and C.R. Kelly. 2008. “The EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges.” International Spectator 43 (3): 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, John. 2005. “Chairing the WTO Negotiation.” Journal of International Economic Law 8 (2): 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Hermann, and Sebastian Oberthür. 1999. Breaking the Impasse. Forging and EU Leadership Initiative on Climate Change. Policy Paper. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Charles, and Christer Karlsson. 2010. “Climate Change and the European Union’s Leadership Moment: An Inconvenient Truth?” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 923–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penetrante, Ariel Macaspac. 2010a. “Politics of Equity and Justice in Climate Change Negotiations in North–South Relations.” In Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks, edited by Hans Günther Brauch, Ursula Spring, Czeslaw Mesjasz, John Grin, Patricia Kameri-Mbote, Bechir Chourou, Pal Dunay, and Jörn Birkmann, 5:1355–1366. Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace. Berlin, Heidelberg & New York: Hexagon Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. “Violence and Misrecognition in Identity Conflicts”. Dissertation, Vienna: University of Vienna. http://othes.univie.ac.at/13146/1/2010-11-03_0603921.pdf.

  • ———. 2011. “The Entanglement of Climate Change in North–South Relations: Stumbling Blocks and Opportunities for Negotiation.” In Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions, edited by Katherine Richardson, Steffen Will, and Diana Livermann, 356–359. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Simulating Climate Change Negotiations: Lessons from Modeled Experience.” Negotiation Journal 27 (3) (July): 279–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities. The North-south Divide in the Climate Change Negotiations.” In Climate Change Negotiations. A Guide to Resolving Disputes and Facilitating Multilateral Cooperation, edited by Gunnar Sjöstedt and Ariel Macaspac Penetrante, 249–276. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polish Press Agency (PAP). 2002. “Zelochowski: Poland May Be Important for Kyoto Protocol.” Polish Press Agency (PAP) News Wire. LexisNexis, July 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidential Committee on Green Growth. 2012. “추진배경 (chujinbaekyung)”. Seoul, South Korea: Presidential Committee on Green Growth. http://www.greengrowth.go.kr/?page_id=2444.

  • Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Harold. 2009. “Dialogue as a Process of Transforming Relationships.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk, and I. William Zartman, 376–391. London: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Roger. 2002. The Skilled Facilitator: Practical Wisdom for Developing Effective Groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, James. 1983. “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties.” International Organization 37: 281–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, Gunnar, and Ariel Macaspac Penetrante, ed. 2013. Climate Change Negotiations. A Guide to Resolving Disputes and Facilitating Multilateral Cooperation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skodvin, Tora. 2000. Structure and Agent in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skodvin, Tora, and Steinar Andresen. 2006. “Leadership Revisited.” Global Environmental Politics 6 (3) (August): 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, Benjamin. 2009. “The Cultural Barriers to Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in the United States.” Energy Policy 31 (4) (November): 365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soytas, Ugur, Ramazan Sari, and Bradley T. Ewing. 2007. “Energy Consumption, Income, and Carbon Emissions in the United States.” Ecological Economics 62 (3–4) (May 15): 482–489. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009.

  • Spangler, Brad. 2003. “Facilitation.” Beyond Intractability. July. http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi-essay/facilitation.

  • Tallberg, Jonas. 2004. “The Power of the Presidency: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations.” JCMS 42 (5): 999–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. “The Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership in International Cooperation.” International Studies Quarterly 54: 241–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Australian. 2009. “New Approach on Global Warming Needed Now”, December 21, sec. News. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/new-approach-on-global-warming-needed-now/story-e6frg71x-1225812242549.

  • The Guardian. 2009. “Copenhagen Climate Summit in Disarray After ‘Danish Text’ Leak”, December 8. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text.

  • Touval, Saadia. 1989. “Multilateral Negotiation: An Analytical Approach.” Negotiation Journal 5 (2): 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underdahl, Arild. 1991. “Solving Collective Problems – Note on Three Models of Leadership. Challenges of a Changing World.” In Festschrift to Willy Østreng, 139–153. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. “Leadership Theory: Rediscovering the Arts of Management.” In International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, edited by I. William Zartman, 178–197. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verolme, Hans. 2012. “European Climate Leadership. Durban and Beyond.” Brussels: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. http://www.boell.eu/downloads/European_Climate_Leadership_Web.pdf.

  • Vogler, John, and Hannes Stephan. 2007. “The European Union in Global Environmental Governance: Leadershipin the Making?” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7 (4): 389–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallström, Margot. 2008. “Reasons to Be Hopeful” November 28, EU Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Michael, and Susan Rosegrant. 2001. “Building Coalitions.” In Breakthrough International Negotiation: How Great Negotiators Transformed the World’s Toughest Post-Cold War Conflicts, 211–227. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, H. 2010. “Poor Nations Fury over Leaked Climate Text.” CNN, January 20. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/12/09/danish.draft.climate.text.0850/.

  • Yamin, Farhana, and Joanna Depledge. 2004. The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambride University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. Peyton. 1991. Negotiation Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Oran. 1989. “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment.” International Organization 43 (3): 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Creating Regimes Arctic Accords and International Governance. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Ripe for Resolution. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. “Two’s Company and More’s a Crowd: The Complexities of Multilateral Negotiation.” In International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, edited by I. William Zartman, 1–10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. William, and Jeffrey Rubin, ed. 2000. Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hernández, A.M. (2014). Strategic Facilitation of the Climate Decision Making Process: Leadership and Coordination as Basis for Long-Term Cooperation. In: Strategic Facilitation of Complex Decision-Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06197-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics