Skip to main content

Simulation as Method of Research: Learning from Experiences of the COP15 Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Facilitation of Complex Decision-Making

Abstract

Climate change negotiations are highly contextual. Each meeting features unique dynamics, which may not be repeated again in any other meeting. For example, the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties (COP15) followed a yearlong pre-negotiation process and was highly affected by various parallel negotiations, such as European Union summits and APEC summit, as well as who or which political party currently sits in the government administration in each participating country. The highly contextualized nature of climate change negotiations presents methodological challenges for scholars intending to look on interdependencies of various factors (Penetrante 2012).

“I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand” (Confucius)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andresen, Steinar, and Lars Gulbrandsen. 2003. “The Role of Green NGOs in Promoting Climate Compliance”. FNI Report 4/2003. Oslo: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute. http://www.fni.no/doc&pdf/rapp0403.pdf.

  • Banks, Jerry, John Carson, Barry Nelson, and David Nicol. 2010. Discrete-Event System Simulation. 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Alan, Harold Kelly, and Barry Liebling. 1972. “Effects of Extremity of Offers and Concession Rate on the Outcomes of Bargaining.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasek, Pamela. 2001. Earth Negotiations: Analyzing Thirty Years of Environmental Diplomacy. Tokyo: UNU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertkoff, Jerome, and Melinda Conley. 1967. “Opening Offer and Frequency of Concessions as Bargaining Strategies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 7: 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Action Network (CAN). 2012. “About CAN”. Climate Action Network. http://www.climatenetwork.org/fossil-of-the-day.

  • Crump, Larry, and I. William Zartman. 2003. “Multilateral Negotiation and the Management of Complexity.” International Negotiation 8 (1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depledge, Joanna. 2005. The Organization of Global Negotiations: Constructing the Climate Change Regime. London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Wei. 2010. “NGOs Play a ‘Constructive Role’ In Climate Change.” China Daily, October 8, sec. Foreign and Military Affairs. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-10/08/content_11386672.htm.

  • Fisher, Roger, and William Ury. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, Adam, and Thomas Mussweiler. 2001. “First Offers as Anchors: The Role of Perspective-Taking and Negotiation Focus.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (4): 657–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Nigel, and Klaus Troitzsch. 2005. Simulation for the Social Scientist. 2nd ed. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbang: The Smart Technology Network. 2009. “COP15 Day 8: African Walkout Over Kyoto Briefly Halts Talks.” http://www.greenbang.com/cop15-day-6-african-walkout-over-kyoto-temporary-halts-talks_12991.html.

  • Hoover, Stewart, and Ronald Perry. 1989. Simulation: A Problem Solving Approach. 1st Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, David, and James Sebenius. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin, Robert, and Lawrence Susskind, ed. 1999. Negotiating on Behalf of Others: Advice to Lawyers, Business Executives, Sport Agents, Diplomats, Politicians, and Everybody Else. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penetrante, Ariel Macaspac. 2010a. “Politics of Equity and Justice in Climate Change Negotiations in North–South Relations.” In Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks, edited by Hans Günther Brauch, Ursula Spring, Czeslaw Mesjasz, John Grin, Patricia Kameri-Mbote, Bechir Chourou, Pal Dunay, and Jörn Birkmann, 5:1355–1366. Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace. Berlin, Heidelberg & New York: Hexagon Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Simulating Climate Change Negotiations: Lessons from Modeled Experience.” Negotiation Journal 27 (3) (July): 279–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen, Thomas, and Matthias Finger. 1994. Environmental NGOs in World Politics: Linking the Local and the Global. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. 2009. “Copenhagen Climate Summit in Disarray After ‘Danish Text’ Leak”, December 8. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text.

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Ripe for Resolution. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. “Two’s Company and More’s a Crowd: The Complexities of Multilateral Negotiation.” In International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, edited by I. William Zartman, 1–10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. William, and Jeffrey Rubin, ed. 2000. Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hernández, A.M. (2014). Simulation as Method of Research: Learning from Experiences of the COP15 Games. In: Strategic Facilitation of Complex Decision-Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06197-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics