Abstract
Smart cities have gained momentum as a conceptual model which embodies a fresh wave of techno-optimism and emphasizes the positive effects of ICT and other innovative technologies in a city, often in combination with multidisciplinary collaborative partnerships. This article assesses a series of six smart city initiatives within one local city ecosystem by proposing a conceptual framework which is then used to analyze the architecture, value flows and contextual dimensions of the smart city Ghent. The results of our analysis show the multi-level collaborative value creation potential in a smart city and shed light on the complexity of these processes. The main conclusion is that current smart city initiatives face the challenge of evolving from demonstrators towards real sustainable value. Smart cities often have a technological deterministic, project-based approach, which forecloses a sustainable, permanent and growing future for the project outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
References
Eurostat. (2012). Eurostat regional yearbook 2012, Luxembourg.
Bloomberg, M. R. (2012). While nations talk, cities act. The @C40Cities mayors summit will advance urban solutions to combat climate change: http://bit.ly/ZGdC3x. March 8, 2012, 7:40 PM. Tweet (MikeBloomberg).
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2009) Smart cities in Europe. Paper presented at the 3rd Central European Conference on Regional Science (CERS), Košice, Slovak Republic.
Dolente, C., Galea, J., & Leporelli, C. (2010). Next generation access and digital divide: opposite sides of the same coin? Paper presented at the European Regional ITS Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Verdegem, P. (2009). De digitale kloof en/in e-government: Uitdagingen voor de overheid in de informatiemaatschappij.
O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Commun. Strateg., 65, 17–37.
Van Audenhove, L., Lievens, B., & Cammaerts, B. (2005). E-democratie voor Vlaanderen: Stand van zaken., Brussels, Belgium.
Poiesz, T. B. C., & Van Raaij, W. F. (2002). Synergetische Marketing. Een visie op oorzaken en gevolg van veranderend consumentengedrag. Amsterdam: Prentice Hall.
Frissen, V., & van Lieshout, M. (2006). ICT and everyday life: The role of the user. In P. Verbeek & A. Slob (Eds.), Technology, behavior and the environment, a multidisciplinary approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
ITU. (2005). The internet of things: Executive summary, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kwon, O., & Kim, J. (2007). A methodology of identifying ubiquitous smart services for U-city development. In J. Indulska, L. T. Yang, J. Cao, J. Ma, E. Loukis, Y. Charalabidis, & J. Scholl (Eds.), Ubiquitous intelligence and computing. Berlin: Springer.
Shin, D. (2009). Ubiquitous city: Urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics. Journal of Information Science, 35, 515–526.
Choi, J. (2010). The city is connections: Seoul as an urban network. Multimedia Systems, 16, 75–84.
Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., & Scholl, J. (2011). Editorial of the special issue on digital cities. Telematics and Informatics, 28, 144–147.
Ergazakis, E., & Ergazakis, K. (2011). Digital cities: Towards an integrated decision support methodology. Telematics and Informatics, 28, 148–162.
Middleton, C., & Bryne, A. (2011). An exploration of user-generated wireless broadband infrastructures in digital cities. Telematics and Informatics, 28, 163–175.
Komninos, N. (2008). Intelligent cities and globalisation of innovation networks. London: Routledge.
Ojala, T., Valkama, V., Kukka, H., Heikkinen, T., Lindén, T., Jurmu, M., et al. (2010). UBI-hotspots: Sustainable ecosystem infrastructure for real world urban computing research and business. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (MEDES 2010), Bangkok, Thailand.
Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring the quadruple helix. Report of Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ Project., Tampere.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University–industry–government. Implications for Policy and Evaluation.
Schuurman, D., De Moor, K., De Marez, L., & Evens, T. (2011). A living lab research approach for mobile TV. Telematics and Informatics, 28, 271–282.
Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: Experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 15, 223–231.
Feurstein, K., Hesmer, A., Hribernik, K., Thoben, T., & Schumacher, J. (2008). Living labs: A new development strategy. In J. Schumacher & V. P. Niitamo (Eds.), European living labs—A new approach for human centric regional innovation. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher.
Buitendag, A. A. K., van der Walt, J. S., Malebane, T., & de Jager, L. (2012). Addressing knowledge support services as part of a living lab environment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 221–241.
Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K., & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668–677.
Paskaleva, K. (2011). The smart city: A nexus for open innovation? Intell. Buildings International, 3, 153–171.
European Commission. (2011). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Digital Agenda for Europe., Brussels, Belgium.
OECD. (2007). Guidelines for access to research data from public funding, Paris, France.
Swan, A. (2012). Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36, 857–875.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Cosgrave, E., & Tryfonas, T. (2012). Exploring the relationship between smart city policy and implementation. In The First International Conference on Smart Systems, Devices and Technologies, pp. 79–82.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17, 484–500.
Fransman, M. (2010). The new ICT ecosystem: Implications for policy and regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stocker, A., Dösinger, G., Saed, A., & Wagner, C. (2007). The three pillars of “corporate web 2.0”: A model for definition. In Proceedings of the I-MEDIA ’07 and I-SEMANTICS ’07 Conference, Graz, Austria.
Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. TIM Rev. September, 6–11 2012.
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259–280.
Brem, A., & Viardot, E. (2013). Evolution of innovation management: Trends in an international context. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bogers, M., & West, J. (2012). Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 61–75.
Hargadon, A. (1998). Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review, 40, 209–227.
Norman, D. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Ballon, P. (2007). Business modelling revisited: The configuration of control and value. Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 9, 6–19.
Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
Stad Gent. (2007). Strategische nota van het meerjarenplan 2007–2012. Available at http://www.gent.be
Schenk, E., & Guittard, C. (2009). Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices. Available online at: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00439256/fr/
Basili, V. R., Briand, L. C., & Melo, W. L. (1996). How reuse influences productivity in object-oriented systems. Communications of the ACM, 39, 104–116.
Snijders, C., Matzat, U., & Reips, U. D. (2012). “Big data”: Big gaps of knowledge in the field of internet science. International Journal of Internet Science, 7, 1–5.
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, Retrived May 21, 2014 from http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/MGI/Research/Technology_and_Innovation/Big_data_The_next_frontier_for_innovation
Anderson, J. Q., & Rainie, L. (2012). Big data: Experts say new forms of information analysis will help people be more nimble and adaptive, but worry over humans’ capacity to understand and use these new tools well, Washington, DC.
Mantelero, A. (2012). Masters of big data: Concentration of power over digital information. Available SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2048236
Davies, T. (2010). Open data, democracy and public sector reform. A look at open government data use from http://www.data.gov.uk. Retrived May 21, 2014 from http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/How-is-open-government-data-being-used-in-practice.pdf
Lippert. (2010). Public sector information reuse in Denmark: European public sector information platform, Topic Report No. 20. European Public Sector Information (PSI) Platform, funded by the European Commission.
Coenen, T., Mechant, P., Laureyssens, T., Claeys, L., & Criel, J. (2013). ZWERM: Stimulating urban neighborhood self-organization through gamification. Presented at the International Conference Using ICT, Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Self-Organisation in Urban and Neighbourhood Governance, Delft, Netherlands.
All, A., Coorevits, L., & Schuurman, D. (2013). Bottom-up radio: Creating a new media format using living lab research. Paper presented at Breaking the Media Value Chain: VII International Conference on Communication and Reality, Barcelona, Spain.
Aslin, H. J. & Brown, V. A. (2004). Towards whole of community engagement: A practical toolkit. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission.
Thompson, L., Stenekes, N., Kruger, H. & Carr, A. (2009). Engaging in biosecurity: Literature review of community engagement approaches. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.
Scearce, D. (2011). Connected Citizens: The Power, Peril and Potential of Networks. Knight Foundation and Monitor Institute, Retrived May 21, 2014 from https://knight.app.box.com/shared/ng70lqn9hb
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.
Stern, M., & Dillman, D. (2006). Community participation, social ties, and use of the internet. City Community, 5, 409–424.
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I. and Miyata, K. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, 0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1315–1338.
Mechant, P., Stevens, I., Evens, T., & Verdegem, P. (2012). E–deliberation 2.0 for smart cities: A critical assessment of two “idea generation” cases. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5, 82–98.
Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2012). Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7, 11–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baccarne, B., Mechant, P., Schuurman, D. (2014). Empowered Cities? An Analysis of the Structure and Generated Value of the Smart City Ghent. In: Dameri, R., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (eds) Smart City. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06159-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06160-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)