Skip to main content

In Situ Observation of Changing Crystal Orientations During Austenite Grain Coarsening

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In-situ Studies with Photons, Neutrons and Electrons Scattering II

Abstract

Understanding the underlying mechanisms of grain coarsening is important to control the properties of metals, which strongly depend on the microstructure that forms during the production process or use at high temperature. Grain coarsening of austenite at 1,273 K in a binary Fe-2 wt% Mn alloy was studied using synchrotron radiation. The evolution of volume, average crystallographic orientation and mosaicity of more than 2,000 individual austenite grains was tracked during annealing. It was found that there exists an approximately linear relationship between grain size and mosaicity, which means that orientation gradients are present in the grains. The orientation gradients remain constant during coarsening and consequently the character of grain boundaries changes during coarsening, affecting the coarsening rate. Furthermore, changes in the average orientation of grains during coarsening were observed. The changes could be understood by taking the observed orientation gradients and anisotropic movement of grain boundaries into account. Five basic modes of grain coarsening were deduced from the measurements which include: anisotropic (I) and isotropic (II) growth (or shrinkage); movement of grain boundaries resulting in no change in volume but change in shape (III), movement of grain boundaries resulting in no change in volume and mosaicity, but change in crystallographic orientation (IV); and no movement of grain boundaries (V).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reprinted with modification from Acta Materialia, vol. 60, Sharma H, Huizenga RM, Bytchkov A, Sietsma J, Offerman SE, Observation of changing crystal orientations during grain coarsening, pp. 229-237 (2012), with permission from Elsevier.

  2. 2.

    In case of very big grains diffraction spots in first and second diffraction rings are saturated and thus cannot be used for analysis. In such cases, spots from third and fourth rings were used for calculating the mosaicity. However, this has the disadvantage that mosaicity of such grains is underestimated arising from problems with the background. Due to this reason, average mosaicity was calculated only for grains with radiuses up to 130 μm.

  3. 3.

    In this way, the mosaicity calculated is the average of maximum orientation difference in multiple directions. This was done in order to compare the mosaicity with equivalent grain radius.

References

  1. Sharma H, Huizenga RM, Bytchkov A, Sietsma J, Offerman SE (2012) Observation of changing crystal orientations during grain coarsening. Acta Materialia 60:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gottstein G, Shvindlerman LS (1999) Grain boundary migration in metals: thermodynamics, kinetics, applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holm EA, Foiles SM (2010) How grain growth stops: a mechanism for grain-growth stagnation in pure materials. Science 328:1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. von Neumann J (1952) Discussion. In: Herring C (ed) Metal interfaces. American Society for Metals, Cleveland, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hillert M (1965) On the theory of normal and abnormal grain growth. Acta Metall 13:227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullins WW (1989) Estimation of the geometrical rate constant in idealized three dimensional grain growth. Acta Metall 37:2979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glazier JA (1993) Grain growth in three dimensions depends on grain topology. Phys Rev Lett 70:2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacPherson RD, Srolovitz DJ (2007) The von Neumann relation generalized to coarsening of three-dimensional microstructures. Nature 446:1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rohrer GS (2005) Influence of interface anisotropy on grain growth and coarsening. Annu Rev Mater Res 35:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Militzer M, Giumelli A, Hawbolt EB, Meadowcroft TR (1996) Austenite grain growth kinetics in Al-killed plain carbon steels. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 27:3399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou TH, O’Malley RJ, Zurob HS (2010) Study of grain growth kinetics in delta-ferrite and austenite with application to thin-slab cast direct-rolling microalloyed steels. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 41A:2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mullins WW (1958) The Effect of Thermal Grooving on Grain Boundary Motion. Acta Metall 6:414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krill CE, Helfen L, Michels D, Natter H, Fitch A, Masson O et al (2001) Size-dependent grain-growth kinetics observed in nanocrystalline Fe. Phys Rev Lett 86:842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Margulies L, Winther G, Poulsen HF (2001) In situ measurement of grain rotation during deformation of polycrystals. Science 291:2392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Poulsen HF, Nielsen SF, Lauridsen EM, Schmidt S, Suter RM, Lienert U et al (2001) Three-dimensional maps of grain boundaries and the stress state of individual grains in polycrystals and powders. J Appl Crystallogr 34:751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Offerman SE, van Dijk NH, Sietsma J, Grigull S, Lauridsen EM, Margulies L et al (2002) Grain nucleation and growth during phase transformations. Science 298:1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Larson BC, Yang W, Ice GE, Budai JD, Tischler JZ (2002) Three-dimensional X-ray structural microscopy with submicrometre resolution. Nature 415:887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt S, Nielsen SF, Gundlach C, Margulies L, Huang X, Jensen DJ (2004) Watching the growth of bulk grains during recrystallization of deformed metals. Science 305:229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt S, Olsen UL, Poulsen HF, Sørensen HO, Lauridsen EM, Margulies L et al (2008) Direct observation of 3-D grain growth in Al–0.1% Mn. Scripta Mater 59:491

    Google Scholar 

  21. Poulsen HF (2004) Three-dimensional X-ray diffraction microscopy-mapping polycrystals and their dynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma H, Wattjes AC, Amirthalingam M, Zuidwijk T, Geerlofs N, Offerman SE (2009) Multipurpose furnace for in situ studies of polycrystalline materials using synchrotron radiation. Rev Sci Instrum 80:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma H, Huizenga RM, Offerman SE (2012) A fast methodology to determine characteristics of large numbers of grains using 3DXRD. I: overlapping diffraction peaks and global parameters. J Appl Crystallogr 45:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma H, Huizenga RM, Offerman SE (2012) A fast methodology to determine characteristics of large numbers of grains using 3DXRD. II: volume, centre-of-mass position and crystallographic orientation of grains. J Appl Crystallogr 45:705–718

    Google Scholar 

  25. http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fable/wiki. Last Accessed 01 Aug 2011

  26. Warren BE (1990) X-ray diffraction. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Landheer H (2010) Nucleation of ferrite in austenite. PhD thesis. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haslam AJ, Phillpot SR, Wolf H, Moldovan D, Gleiter H (2001) Mechanisms of grain growth in nanocrystalline fcc metals by molecular-dynamics simulation. Mater Sci Eng A Str Mater Prop Microstruct Process 318:293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Farkas D, Mohanty S, Monk J (2007) Linear Grain Growth Kinetics and Rotation in Nanocrystalline Ni. Phys Rev Lett 98:165502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Upmanyu M, Srolovitz DJ, Lobkovsky AE, Warren JA, Carter WC (2006) Simultaneous Grain Boundary Migration and Grain Rotation. Acta Mater 54:1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Watanabe T, Fujii H, Oikawa H, Arai KI (1989) Acta Metall 37:941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Holm EA, Hassold GN, Miodownik MA (2001) Acta Mater 49:2981

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank E. G. Dere for assistance during the synchrotron measurements, F. Gersprach for discussions on the generation of defects by moving grain boundaries and C. Kwakernaak for EPMA analysis. This research is financially supported by the Foundation for Technical Sciences (STW) of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). The authors thank the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for the provision of beamtime.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Erik Offerman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Equation of Volume of a Grain

The diffracted intensity I g per unit time from a single grain, rotated through the Bragg condition in order to illuminate the whole grain, is given by the following expression for the kinematic approximation (4, 5):

$$ I_{grain} = \frac{{I_{0} }}{\Delta \theta }\left( {\frac{{\mu_{0} }}{4\pi }} \right)^{2} \frac{{e^{4} }}{{m^{2} }}\frac{{\lambda^{3} F_{hkl}^{2} }}{{V_{c}^{2} }}V_{g} L_{g} P\exp ( - 2M) $$
(S(vi))

where I 0 is the incident intensity of photons, F hkl is the structure factor of the hkl-reflection, λ is the photon wavelength, V g is the volume of the grain, Δθ is the change in scattering vector over which the grain is in reflection (Eq. S(ii)), V c is the volume of the unit cell, \( P = \left( {1 + \cos^{2} 2\theta } \right)/2 \) is the polarization factor, and \( L_{g} = 1/\sin 2\theta \) is the Lorentz factor, where 2θ is the scattering angle. The Debye-Waller factor exp(−2 M) accounts for the thermal vibrations of atoms, with

$$ M = \frac{{6h^{2} T}}{{mk_{B} \varTheta^{2} }}\left[ {\phi (x) + \frac{x}{4}} \right]\left( {\frac{\sin \theta }{\lambda }} \right)^{2} $$
(S(vii))

where h is the Planck constant, m is the mass of the vibrating atom, k B is the Boltzmann constant, Θ is the Debye temperature, x = Θ/T is the relative temperature, T is the temperature and

$$ \phi (x) = \frac{1}{x}\int\limits_{0}^{x} {\frac{\xi }{\exp (\xi ) - 1}d\xi } $$
(S(viii))

The integrated intensity I p per unit time of a hkl-diffraction ring of a polycrystalline material (often termed as powder in diffraction) with randomly oriented grains is given by (4, 5)

$$ I_{powder} = \varPhi_{0} \left( {\frac{{\mu_{0} }}{4\pi }} \right)^{2} \frac{{e^{4} }}{{m^{2} }}\frac{{\lambda^{3} m_{hkl} F_{hkl}^{2} }}{{V_{c}^{2} }}V_{gauge} L_{p} P\exp \left( { - 2M} \right) $$
(S(ix))

where m hkl is the multiplicity factor of the hkl-ring and V gauge is the volume of the diffracting phase. The Lorentz factor for a powder is given by L p  = 1/(4sinθ).

The volume of an individual grain is calculated from the measured grain intensity I g normalized by the powder intensity I p of the hkl-ring in which the reflection from the individual grain appeared. In case the diffraction spot appears in more than one diffraction pattern, the intensity from the grain is divided by a factor k, equal to the number of diffraction patterns in which the spot is present. Combining Eqs. S(vi)) and S(ix) and introducing k gives Eq. S(i)

$$ V_{g} = \frac{1}{2}m_{hkl} \cos \left( \theta \right)V_{gauge} \frac{{I_{g} }}{{kI_{p} }}\Delta \theta $$
(S(i))

Equation S(i) is similar to the equation for volume of a grain used by Lauridsen et al. (6) and Offerman et al. (7). However, the following corrections have been made-

  1. 1.

    In the current analysis, diffraction spots distributed in more than one diffraction pattern were used for the volume calculation. Thus, the additional factor k is used.

  2. 2.

    The expression for Δθ used by Lauridsen et al. and Offerman et al. is \( \Delta \theta = \Delta \omega \cdot \left| {\sin \left( \eta \right)} \right| \). However, this is an approximation which does not hold for low values of η. In the current analysis, Eq. S(ii) is used which is the exact form of the expression for Δθ. From Fig. S6, the expression for Δθ can be calculated as follows:

The projection along the x-axis of the vector (x, y, z) of length r in the direction of the plane normal before rotation is given as

$$ x = - r\sin \theta $$

After rotation, the vector is given as

$$ x' = - r\sin (\theta + \Delta \theta ) $$
(S(x))

Also, applying the rotation transform on vector r′ gives

$$ x' = - r\sin \theta \cos \Delta \omega - r\sin \eta \sin \Delta \omega \cos \theta $$
(S(xi))

Combining Eqs. S(x) and S(xi) gives Eq. S(ii)

$$ \Delta \theta = \sin^{ - 1} \left( {\sin \left( \theta \right)\cos \left( {\Delta \omega } \right) + \cos \left( \theta \right)\sin \left| \eta \right|\sin \left( {\Delta \omega } \right)} \right) - \theta $$
(S(ii))

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharma, H., Huizenga, R.M., Bytchkov, A., Sietsma, J., Offerman, S.E. (2014). In Situ Observation of Changing Crystal Orientations During Austenite Grain Coarsening. In: Kannengiesser, T., Babu, S., Komizo, Yi., Ramirez, A. (eds) In-situ Studies with Photons, Neutrons and Electrons Scattering II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06145-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics