Abstract
Deviations from the bulk behavior of the temperature dependence of the structural relaxation time \(\tau \)(T), typically well described by the Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann (VFT) relation, are the most obvious signature for “confinement effects,” which comprise various scenarios ranging from slight changes in the VFT parameters to cases where the VFT behavior completely breaks down to an Arrhenius law. An attractive idea that has finally stimulated many studies on nanoconfined glass formers is the concept of cooperativity with a cooperative length scale \(\xi \) that dates back to Adams Gibbs and is also a subject of modern concepts for the description of glasses and supercooled liquids. In this chapter, we discuss the question in how far experiments on glass-forming liquids, confined to nanometer-sized geometries, can prove the cooperative nature and of the dynamic glass transition and provide quantitative information about its characteristic length scale \(\xi \). Here, we have particularly focused on experimental evidence regarding deviations of \(\tau \)(T) from the bulk behavior. To classify experimental findings from very diverse systems, we introduce three major “deviation scenarios,” which range from a complete breakdown of the VFT-law (type I) via a VFT-Arrhenius cross-over scenario (type II) to a scenario (III) representing a perturbed VFT behavior in terms of an overall accelerated or retarded glass transition dynamics. Four cases are discussed in detail, all of them referring to H-bonding molecules or molecular groups. EG confined in various zeolitic hosts revealed either bulk dynamics or the scenario I, while EG mixed with amylopectine (starch) showed an evolution through the cross-over scenario (II) toward genuine Arrhenius behavior (I). A third system, representing a H-bonding “liquid” confined to a self-assembled (smectic) layer structure, yielded a clear-cut scenario II along with a linear relation between the layer thickness and the cross-over frequency. Subsequently, the dynamics of ultrathin films of glycerol having one free surface was discussed as an example for a perturbated VFT-scenario (type III). Apart from all molecular details and the diversity of confining host structures, it is evident that the strength of the confinement, expressed by the number of spatially restricted dimensions (1D \(=\) layer, 3D \(=\) cavities), should be linked to the severeness of changes in the dynamics. Inventarization of various experimental findings reported in the literature including them described above indeed confirm a correlation between the “deviation scenario” and the number of constrained axes. Finally, the effect of mechanisms other than cooperativity arguments, e.g., surface interactions, density, packing, and orientation effects, will briefly be discussed to rationalize obvious exceptions from the proposed correlation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- Al:
-
Aluminum
- \(\alpha \)-:
-
Structural relaxation process
- AFM:
-
Atomic force microscopy
- AG:
-
Adams-Gibbs (approach)
- AP:
-
Amylopectine
- BDS:
-
Broadband dielectric spectroscopy
- CRR:
-
Cooperatively rearranging regions
- DRS:
-
Dielectric relaxation spectroscopy
- DSC:
-
Differential scanning calorimetry
- \(\Delta \varepsilon \) :
-
Dielectric strength
- \(s\) :
-
Electrical conductivity
- EG:
-
Ethylene glycol
- \(\varepsilon _{\infty }\) :
-
nstantaneous dielectric constant
- \(g\) :
-
Kirkwood factor
- \(h\) :
-
Film thickness
- HN:
-
Havriliak-Negami (function)
- \(k_{\mathrm{B}}\) :
-
Boltzmann constant
- MCT:
-
Mode-coupling theory
- min:
-
Minute(s)
- mol:
-
Mole(s)
- \(M_{\mathrm{w}}\) :
-
Weight average molecular weight
- OMBD:
-
Organic molecular beam deposition
- \(\xi \) :
-
Cooperativity lengthCooperativity length
- \(\tau _{\alpha }\) :
-
(Structural) relaxation time
- \(\tau \) :
-
Relaxation time
- \(t\) :
-
Time
- \(T\) :
-
Temperature
- \(T_{\mathrm{g}}\) :
-
Glass transition temperature
- VFT:
-
Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann (equation)
- 1D:
-
One-dimensional
References
Vogel H (1921) Z Phys 22:645
Fulcher GS (1925) J Am Ceram Soc 6:339
Tammann G, Hesse G (1926) Z Anorg Allg Chem 156:245
Adam G, Gibbs JH (1965) J Chem Phys 43:139
Lubchenko V, Wolynes PG (2007) Ann Rev Phys Chem 58:23
Tanaka H (2012) Eur Phys J E 35:113
Yamchi MZ, Ashwin SS, Bowles RK (2012) Phy Rev Lett 109:225701
Hedstrom J, Swenson J, Bergman R, Jansson H, Kittaka S (2007) Eur Phys J Spec Top 141:53
Donth E (2002) J Non-Cryst Solids 307:364
Hempel E, Vieweg S, Huwe A, Otto K, Schick C, Donth E (2000) J De Phys Iv 10:79
Cangialosi D, Alegria A, Colmenero J (2007) Phys Rev E 76:011514
van Turnhout J, Wübbenhorst M (2002) J. Non-Cryst. Solids 305:50
Napolitano S, Lupascu V, Wübbenhorst M (2008) Macromolecules 41:1061
Arndt M, Stannarius R, Groothues H, Hempel E, Kremer F (1997) Phys Rev Lett 79:2077
Napolitano S, Pilleri A, Rolla PA, Wübbenhorst M (2010) ACS Nano 4:841
McKenna GB (2010) Eur Phys J Spec Top 189:285
Wübbenhorst M, Klap GJ, Jansen JC, van Bekkum H, van Turnhout J (1999) J Chem Phys 111:5637
Lagrene K, Zanotti JM (2007) Eur Phys J Spec Top 141:261
Dobbertin J, Hensel A, Schick C (1996) J Therm Anal 47:1027
Anastasiadis SH, Karatasos K, Vlachos G, Manias E, Giannelis EP (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:915
Wübbenhorst M, Capponi S, Napolitano S, Rozanski S, Couderc G, Behrnd NR, Hulliger J (2010) Eur Phys J Spec Top 189:181
Beiner M (2001) Macromol Rapid Commun 22:869
Starkweather HW (1991) Polymer 32:2443
Eyring E (1936) J Chem Phys 4:283
Huwe A, Kremer F, Behrens P, Schwieger W (1999) Phys Rev Lett 82:2338
Bibby DM, Dale MP (1985) Nature 317:157
Meier WM, Olson DH, Baerlocher C (1996) Atlas of Zeolite structure types. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Havriliak S, Negami S (1967) Polymer 8:161
Jordan BP, Sheppard EJ, Szwarnowski S (1978) J Phys D 11:695
Cusack NE (1987) The physics of structurally disordered matter. Adam Hilger, Bristol
Smits ALM, Wübbenhorst M, Kruiskamp PH, van Soest JJG, Vliegenthart JFG, van Turnhout J (2001) J Phys Chem B 105:5630
Smits ALM, Hulleman SHD, van Soest JJG, Feil H, Vliegenthart JFG (1999) Polym Adv Technol 10:570
Kruiskamp PH, Smits ALM, Vliegenthart JFG (2001) Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26:90
Mertens IJA, Wübbenhorst M, Oosterbaan WD, Jenneskens LW, van Turnhout J (1999) Macromolecules 32:3314
Wübbenhorst M, van Turnhout J (2002) J Non-Cryst Solids 305:40
Donth E (1982) J Non-Cryst Solids 53:325
Jansen JC (1996) PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft
Wübbenhorst M, Van Koten E, Jansen J, Mijs M, van Turnhout J (1997) Macromol Rapid Commun 18:139
Wübbenhorst M, Van Eeten F, Van Turnhout J (2014) Manuscript in preparation
Yildirim Z, Wübbenhorst M, Mendes E, Picken SJ, Paraschiv I, Marcelis ATM, Zuilhof H, Sudhölter EJR (2005) J Non-Cryst Solids 351:2622
Jasiurkowska M, Napolitano S, Wübbenhorst M, Leys J, Juszyńska E, Massalska-Arodź M (2014) Manuscript in preparation
Donth E (1992) Relaxation and thermodynamics in polymers, glass transition. Akademie, Berlin
Hempel E, Hempel G, Hensel A, Schick C, Donth E (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:2460
de Gennes PG (2000) Eur Phys J E 2:201
Forrest JA, Dalnoki-Veress K (2001) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 94:167
Jones RAL (1999) Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 4:153
Keddie JL, Jones RAL, Cory RA (1994) Faraday Discuss 98:219
Napolitano S, Rotella C, Wübbenhorst M Acs Macro Lett 1:1189
Choa Y-K, Granick S (2003) J Chem Phys 119:547
Zheng W, Simon SL (2007) J Chem Phys 127:194501
Simon SL, Park JY, McKenna GB (2002) Eur Phys J E 8:209
Capponi S, Napolitano S, Behrnd N, Couderc G, Hulliger J, Wübbenhorst M (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:16696
Peters S, Napolitano S, Meyer H, Wübbenhorst M, Baschnagel J (2008) Macromolecules 41:7729
Lunkenheimer P, Pimenov A, Schiener B, Böhmer R, Loidl A (1996) Eur Lett 33:611
Mobius ME, Xia T, van Saarloos W, Orrit M, van Hecke M (2010) J Phys Chem B 114:7439
Zondervan R, Kulzer F, Berkhout GCG, Orrit M (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12628
Kilburn D, Sokol PE, Sakai VG, Alam MA (2008) Appl Phys Lett 92:1
Levchenko AA, Jain P, Trofymluk O, Yu P, Navrotsky A, Sen S (2010) J Phys Chem B 114:3070
Capponi S, Napolitano S, Wübbenhorst M (2012) Nat Commun 3:1233
Schneider U, Lunkenheimer P, Brand R, Loidl A (1998) J Non-Cryst Solids 235:173
Roth CB, Torkelson JM (2007) Macromolecules 40:3328
Rotella C, Napolitano S, Wübbenhorst M (2009) Macromolecules 42:1415
Lupascu V, Picken SJ, Wübbenhorst M (2006) J Non-Cryst Solids 352:5594
Schonhals A, Goering H, Schick C, Frick B, Zorn R (2004) Colloid Polym Sci 282:882
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wübbenhorst, M., Napolitano, S. (2014). Deviations from Bulk Glass Transition Dynamics of Small Molecule Glass Formers: Some Scenarios in Relation to the Dimensionality of the Confining Geometry. In: Kremer, F. (eds) Dynamics in Geometrical Confinement. Advances in Dielectrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06100-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06100-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06099-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06100-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)