Advertisement

Hydrolysis Kinetics and Lifetime Prediction for Polycarbonate and Polyesters in Solar Energy Applications

  • James E. Pickett
Conference paper

Abstract

The hydrolysis kinetics of polyesters and BPA polycarbonate appear to be second order in water, that is, second order in relative humidity (RH). This finding, combined with activation energies for hydrolysis, was used in a service life prediction model for a photovoltaic (PV) module front sheet application. The modeling process involves: (1) finding finely time-parsed climatic data for a benchmark location, (2) calculating module temperature and RH from the climatic data, and (3) applying the kinetics to determine the amount of degradation that occurs in 1 year relative to accelerated laboratory conditions, 85 °C and 85 % RH in this case. Acceleration factors under laboratory conditions are very high, especially for poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), leading to predicted lifetimes of several centuries if hydrolysis is the only degradation mode. The model was tested for sensitivity to assumptions and experimental uncertainties, and hydrolysis can be considered unimportant in this solar energy application. Concerns about PET suitability on the basis of its relatively short embrittlement times in the 85 °C/85 % RH damp heat test are unfounded.

Keywords

Service life prediction Activation energy Hydrolysis Kinetics PET Polycarbonate Solar 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Ken Gillen, now retired from Sandia National Laboratories, for inspiring the kinetic analysis, Dennis Coyle at GE Global Research for collaboration at critical points in the kinetic analysis, and Mike Kempe at NREL, Golden, CO, for sharing the Miami climatic data set and for several stimulating and helpful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Pickett JE, Sybert PD, Carter RL, Gibson DA, Rice ST (2007) Weathering characteristics of resorcinol arylate copolymers. Polym Prepr 48(1):643–644Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou J, Pickett JE, Chakravarti S US Patent application US 20120248497Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kempe MD, Wohlgemuth JH (2013) Evaluation of temperature and humidity on PV module component degradation. In: 39th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference, Tampa, FL, 16–21 June 2013 (also NREL PV module reliability workshop, Golden CO, 26–27 Feb 2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pickett JE, Gardner MM (2005) Reproducibility of Florida weathering data. Polym Degrad Stab 90:418–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Wilcox S, Marion W (2008) Users manual for TMY3 data sets. Technical report NREL/TP-581-43156, Revised May 2008. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/43156.pdf
  7. 7.
    King DL, Boyson WE, Kratochvil JA Photovoltaic array performance model. SAND2004-3535, Sandia National Laboratories. http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2004/043535.pdf
  8. 8.
    TamizhMani G, Ji L, Tang Y, Petacci L, Osterwald C Photovoltaic module thermal/wind performance: long-term monitoring and model development for energy rating. NREL/CD-520-33586, p 936. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy03osti/35645.pdf
  9. 9.
    Skoplaki E, Boudouvis AG, Palyvos JA (2008) A simple correlation for the operating temperature of photovoltaic modules of arbitrary mounting. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92:1393–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis MW, Fanney AH, Dougherty BP (2001) Prediction of building integrated photovoltaic cell temperatures. Trans ASME 123:200–210Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bijl P, Heikkilä A, Syrjälä S, Aarva A, Poikonen A (2011) Modeling of sample surface temperature in an outdoor weathering test. Polym Test 30:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koehl M, Heck M, Wiesmeier S, Wirth J (2011) Modeling of the nominal operating cell temperature based on outdoor weathering. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 95:1638–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pickett JE, Sargent JR (2009) Sample temperatures during outdoor and laboratory weathering exposures. Polym Degrad Stab 94:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alduchov OA, Eskridge E (1996) Improved Magnus form approximation of saturation vapor pressure. J Appl Meteorol 35:601–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pickett JE, Coyle DJ (2013) Hydrolysis kinetics of condensation polymers under humidity aging conditions. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1311–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golovoy A, Zinbo M (1989) Water sorption and hydrolytic stability of polycarbonates. Polym Eng Sci 29:1733–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McMahon W, Birdsall HA, Johnson GR, Camilli CT (1959) Degradation studies of polyethylene terephthalate. J Chem Eng Data 4:57–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jencks WP, Carriuolo J (1961) General base catalysis of ester hydrolysis. J Am Chem Soc 83:1743–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Euranto EK, Cleve NJ (1963) Kinetics of the neutral hydrolysis of chloromethyl chloroacetate. Acta Chem Scand 17:1584–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsieh Y-H, Weinberg N, Wolfe S (2009) The neutral hydrolysis of methyl acetate—Part 1. Kinetic experiments. Can J Chem 87:539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shi Z, Hsieh Y-H, Weinberg N, Wolfe S (2009) The neutral hydrolysis of methyl acetate—Part 2. Is there a tetrahedral intermediate? Can J Chem 87:544–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dixon RR (1980) Thermal aging predictions from an Arrhenius plot with only one data point. IEEE Trans Electr Insul EI-15(4):331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GE Global ResearchNiskayunaUSA

Personalised recommendations