Skip to main content

Predicting Search Task Difficulty

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8416))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Search task difficulty refers to a user’s assessment about the amount of effort required to complete a search task. Our goal in this work is to learn predictive models of search task difficulty. We evaluate features derived from the user’s interaction with the search engine as well as features derived from the user’s level of interest in the task and level of prior knowledge in the task domain. In addition to user-interaction features used in prior work, we evaluate features generated from scroll and mouse-movement events on the SERP. In some situations, we may prefer a system that can predict search task difficulty early in the search session. To this end, we evaluate features in terms of whole-session evidence and first-round evidence, which excludes all interactions starting with the second query. Our results found that the most predictive features were different for whole-session vs. first-round prediction, that mouseover features were effective for first-round prediction, and that level of interest and prior knowledge features did not improve performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R.: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aula, A., Khan, R.M., Guan, Z.: How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? In: CHI, pp. 35–44 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, D.J., Ruthven, I.: Searchers’ assessments of task complexity for web searching. In: McDonald, S., Tait, J.I. (eds.) ECIR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2997, pp. 57–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Byström, K., Järvelin, K.: Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inf. Process. Manage. 31(2), 191–213 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell, D.J.: Task complexity: A review and analysis. The Academy of Management Review 13(1), 40–52 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan, R.-E., Chang, K.-W., Hsieh, C.-J., Wang, X.-R., Lin, C.-J.: Liblinear: A library for large linear classification. JMLR 9, 1871–1874 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Feild, H.A., Allan, J., Jones, R.: Predicting searcher frustration. In: SIGIR, pp. 34–41 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen, B.J., Booth, D., Smith, B.: Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Inf. Process. Manage. 45(6), 643–663 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J.: Task difficulty as a predictor and indicator of web searching interaction. In: CHI, pp. 959–964 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Y., Belkin, N.J.: A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Inf. Process. Manage. 44(6), 1822–1837 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, J., Cole, M.J., Liu, C., Bierig, R., Gwizdka, J., Belkin, N.J., Zhang, J., Zhang, X.: Search behaviors in different task types. In: JCDL, pp. 69–78 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N.J.: Predicting task difficulty for different task types. ASIS&T, 16:1–16:10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J., Liu, C., Cole, M., Belkin, N.J., Zhang, X.: Exploring and predicting search task difficulty. In: CIKM, pp. 1313–1322 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, J., Liu, C., Gwizdka, J., Belkin, N.J.: Can search systems detect users‘ task difficulty?: some behavioral signals. In: SIGIR, pp. 845–846 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smucker, M.D., Allan, J., Carterette, B.: A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation. In: CIKM, pp. 623–632 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. White, R.W., Dumais, S.T.: Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior. In: CIKM, pp. 87–96 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wood, R.E.: Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37(1), 60–82 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, W.-C., Kelly, D., Edwards, A., Arguello, J.: Grannies, tanning beds, tattoos and nascar: evaluation of search tasks with varying levels of cognitive complexity. In: IIIX, pp. 254–257 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arguello, J. (2014). Predicting Search Task Difficulty. In: de Rijke, M., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06027-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06028-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics