Abstract
Industrial agriculture has clearly reached its limits. Industrial agriculture is not able anymore to satisfy the basic needs of the growing worldwide population while ensuring the conditions of reproduction of natural assets. New production models have to be designed to protect and reclame polluted and degraded agricultural areas. Agroecology is considered as a promising way to achieve ecologically-intensive agrosystems, since the seminal contribution of Altieri in 1995. Nevertheless agroecology has not fully emerged as a scientific discipline yet. Agroecology is more that a traditional scientific discipline because agroecology breaks the frontiers between biophysical sciences and social sciences. This chapter reviews the roots and evolution of agroecology in the first section. Here we propose a mathematical theory of viability to handle uncertainty and complexity within agrosystems. This theory allows to define a kern of viability in which the agrosystem stay viable in the long term (section “Scientific stakes: New frontiers”). However, agroecological innovations create new uncertainties and controversies that must be solved. Some solutions can be found individually while other solutions must by co-constructed using innovative collective actions and hydrid forums (Callon et al. 2001, section “Scientific controversy and uncertainty”). Such collective knowledge makes agroecology as the starting point of a representative democracy by setting up adaptive governance on territories (section “How to manage agrosystems in the context of global changes?”).
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altieri MA (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder
Altieri MA, Nicholls C, Funes F (2012) The scaling up of agroecology: spreading the hope for food sovereignty and resiliency, a contribution to discussions at Rio+20 on issues at the interface of hunger, agriculture, environment and social justice. SOCLA’s Rio+20 position paper, 20 p
Anderies J, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9(1):18
Angeon V, Caron A (2009) Quel rôle joue la proximité dans l’émergence et la pérennité de modes de gestion durable des ressources naturelles? Nat Sci Soc 17:361–372
Angeon V, Bates S, Chia E, Diman JL, Fanchone A, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Saint-Pierre P (2013) Détermination des contraintes de viabilité des exploitations agricoles: application aux Antilles françaises, 50ème colloque de l’Association de Science Régionale de Langue Française, Mons, Belgique, 8–11 juillet 2013
Aubin JP (2010) La mort du devin, l’émergence du démiurge. Essai sur la contingence, la viabilité et l’inertie des systèmes, Beauchesne, Paris, 604 p. EAN/ISBN: 9782701015040
Bajoit G (2006) Le changement social – approches sociologiques des sociétés occidentales contemporaines. Armand Colin, Paris
Batáry P, Báldi A, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2011) Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis. Proc R Soc B 278(1713):1894–1902. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1923, 22
Baudry J, Burel F (1999) Ecologie du paysage. Concepts, méthodes et applications. Editions Tec&Doc/Lavoisier, Paris, 360 p
Bensin BM (1928) Agroecological characteristics description and classification of the local corn varieties chorotypes
Berkes F (2006) From community-based resource management to complex systems: the scale issue and marine commons. Ecol Soc 11(1):15p
Brussaard L, Caron P, Campbell B, Lipper L, Mainka S, Rabbinge R, Babin D, Pulleman M (2010) Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:34–42. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.007
Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Le Seuil (La couleur des idées), Paris
Capra F (2003) La toile de la vie: une nouvelle interprétation scientifique des systèmes vivants. Paris, Le Rocher, 370 p
Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8
de Schutter O (2010) Rapport du Rapporteur spécial sur le droit à l’alimentation, Nations Unies, décembre 2010
de Schutter O (2011) Agroécologie et droit à l’alimentation. Rapport Présenté à La 16ème Session Du Conseil Des Droits De l’Homme De l’ONU, New York, Etats-Unis, ONU
Debray A (2011) La notion de réseau écologique en France: construction scientifique, appropriation par les politiques publiques et traduction territoriale. Vertigo – la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, Débats et perspectives, (en ligne). doi:10.4000/vertigo.10687
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912. doi:10.1126/science.1091015
European Union (2011) La biodiversité, notre assurance-vie et notre capital naturel – Stratégie de l’UE à l’horizon 2020, Communication de la commission au parlement européen, au conseil, au comité économique et social européens et au comité des régions, Bruxelles, COM(2011) 244 final, 3 mai 2011, 17 p
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann Rev Environ Res 30:441–473
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011) Save and grow. A policymaker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production. FAO, Rome, 102 p. ISBN 978-92-5-106871-7. http://www.fao.org/ag/save-and-grow/
Francis C, Lieblein G, Gliessman S, Breland TA, Creamer N, Harwood L, Salomonsson L, Helenius J, Rickerl D, Salvador R, Wiedenhoeft M, Simmons S, Allen P, Altieri M, Flora C, Poincelot R (2003) Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. J Sust Agr 22(3):99–118
Funes Monzote FR (2009) Agricultura con futuro. La alternativa agroecologica para Cuba. Estacion experimental Indio Hathuey. Universidad de Matanzas, Cuba
Giddens A (1999) Runaway world: how globalization is reshaping our lives. Profile, London, 104 p
Griffon M (2006) Nourrir la planète. Pour une révolution doublement verte. Odile Jacob, Paris, 456p
Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
Hall AJ (2009) Challenges to strengthening agricultural innovation systems: where do we go from here? Farmer First revisited. Scones and Thompson, London
IAD (2011) L’agriculture de 2050 commence maintenant. Produit par L’Institut de L’Agriculture Durable, 47 p
IPCC (2007) Fourth assessment report (IPCC AR4). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
IPCC (2013) Climate change. The physical science basis, Working group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, NY, USA
Kassie M, Zikhali P, Pender J, Köhlin G (2009) Sustainable agricultural practices and agricultural productivity in Ethiopia: does agroecology matter? Environment for Development, April 2009, DP-09-12, 43 p
Mermet L (2011) Strategic environmental management analysis: addressing the blind spots of collaborative approaches. IDDRI, Coll pour le débat, n°5, 34 p
Mermet L, Leroy M, Narcy JB, Poux X (2005) L’analyse Stratégique de la gestion environnementale: un cadre théorique pour penser l’efficacité en matière d’environnement. Nat Sci Soc 13:127–137
Monod J (1970) Le hasard et la nécessité. Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Edition du Seuil, Paris, 197p
Mzoughi N, Napoléone C (2013) L’écologisation, une voie pour reconditionner les modèles agricoles et dépasser leur simple évolution incrémentale. Nat Sci Soc 21:161–165. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2013092
Ozier-Lafontaine H, Angeon V (2012) Viability and adaptive governance of tropical island Agrosystems. French National Research Agency, Antilles françaises, March, 43 p
Ozier-Lafontaine H, Boval M, Alexandre G, Chave M, Grandisson M (2011) Vers l’émergence de nouveaux systèmes agricoles durables pour la satisfaction des besoins alimentaires aux Antilles-Guyane. Innov Agrono 16:135–152
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environ Change 19:354–365
Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):22p
Saint-Pierre P (1994) Approximation of the viability kernel. Appl Math Optim 29:187–209
Saint-Pierre P (1997) Le calcul du noyau de viabilité, outil d’analyse des modèles dynamiques de systèmes contraints. In Blasco F (ed) Tendances nouvelles en modélisation pour l’environnement: Journées du Programme Environnement, vie et sociétés du CNRS [Paris, 1996]. Elsevier, Paris/Amsterdam/Oxford
Termeer C, Dewulf A, van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15:15
Tomich TP, Brodt S, Ferris H, Galt R, Horwath WR, Kebreab E, Leveau JHJ, Liptzin D, Lubell M, Merel P, Michelmore R, Rosenstock T, Scow K, Six J, Williams N, Yang L (2011) Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012110-121302
Vimal R (2010) Des aires protégées aux réseaux écologiques: science, technique et participation pour penser collectivement la durabilité des territoires, Thèse en biologie des populations et écologie, Université de Montpellier II, décembre 2010
World Bank (2006) Enhancing agricultural innovation: how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. Economic Sector Work report, Washington, DC
World Bank (2007) Améliorer l’innovation agricole: Comment aller au-delà du renforcement des systèmes de recherche. Banque Mondiale, Washington, DC
Young OR, Berkhout F, Gallopin GC, Janssen MA, Ostrom E, van der Leeuw S (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Chang 16:304–331
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Angeon, V., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Lesueur-Jannoyer, M., Larade, A. (2014). Agroecology Theory, Controversy and Governance. In: Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Lesueur-Jannoyer, M. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 14. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06016-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06016-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06015-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06016-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)