Abstract
When considered in the educational sphere, diversity often refers to the classroom and the ways in which teachers cater for the variety of learning needs of their students. At this classroom level, much can be learnt from the research literature regarding the factors likely to enhance the engagement and achievement of students in mathematics. However, diversity can be conceptualized more broadly in ways that identify distinct gaps in the mathematical opportunities provided for particular groups within society. One such example is geographical location, which emerged as an issue from international comparisons of data made available by the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). These data highlight consistent significant differences in the achievement of students in rural schools when compared to their peers in metropolitan schools for a number of countries. In this chapter, Australia is taken as a case study. Geographical diversity around mathematical achievement is explored by synthesizing the evidence currently available and outlining some of the key contributing factors. Possible ways for enhancing greater inclusivity in mathematics classrooms across location are proposed.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainscow, M. (2007). Taking an inclusive turn. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7(1), 3–7.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2009). Annual report 2009–2010. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2011). The Australian curriculum: Mathematics version3.0. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Rationale. Accessed 10 April 2014.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). NAPLAN achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National Report for 2012. Sydney: ACARA.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Education services Australia for the ministerial council for education, early childhood development and youth affairs (MCEECDYA). http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/OrganisationStandards/Organisation. Accessed 3 Feb 2014.
Barley, Z. A., & Beesley, A. D. (2007). Rural school success: What can we learn? Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(1), 1–16.
Bascia, N., & Hargreaves, A. (2000). Teaching and leading on the sharp edge of change. In N. Bascia & A. Hagreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change, teaching, leading and the realities of reform (pp. 3–26). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Calabrese-Barton, A. (2007). Science learning in urban settings. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 319–343). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1988). Schooling in rural Australia. Canberra: AGPS.
Corrigan, D. (2004). Understanding mentoring. In D. Corrigan & J. Loughran (Eds.), Snapshots of mentoring: Vignettes of practice (pp. 5–11). Clayton: Monash Print Services.
Cresswell, J., & Underwood, C. (2004). Location, location, location: Implications of geographic situation on student performance in PISA 2000. ACER research monograph number 58. Camberwell: ACER.
D’Amico, J. J., & Nelson, V. (2000). How on earth did you hear about us? A study of exemplary rural school practices in the Upper Midwest. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16(3), 182–192.
De Bortoli, L., & Thomson, S. (2009). The achievement of Australia’s indigenous students in PISA 2000–2006. http://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/6. Accessed 23 Sept 2013.
Howley, C. (2003). Mathematics achievement in rural schools. ERIC digest. http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps46365/lps46365/eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED478348.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2013.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (HREOC). (2000). Emerging themes: National inquiry into rural and remote education. http://www.humanrights.gov.au/pdf/human_rights/emerging_themes.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2014.
Jones, R. (2004). Geolocation questions and coding index. A technical report submitted to the MCEETYA performance measurement and reporting taskforce. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/geolocation_questions_and_coding_index_11968.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2013.
Loughran, J. (2010). What expert teachers do: Teachers’ professional knowledge of classroom practice. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, London: Routledge.
Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia: Report from the SiMERR national survey. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
McConney, A., & Perry, L. B. (2010). Science and mathematics achievement in Australia: The role of school socioeconomic composition in educational equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 429–452.
MCEETYA. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2013.
MCEETYA Task force on rural and remote education, training, employment and children’s services. (2001). National framework for rural and remote education. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/verve/_resources/rural_file.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2013.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET). (1991). Towards a national education and training strategy for rural Australia. Canberra: AGPS.
Panizzon, D. (2011). Teaching secondary science in rural and remote schools: Exploring the critical role of a professional learning community. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 173–188). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pardhan, H., & Mohammad, R. F. (2005). Teaching science and mathematics for conceptual understanding? A rising issue. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 1–20.
Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality matters: Revitalising teaching, critical times, critical choices. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.
Roberts, P. (2005). Staffing an empty schoolhouse: Attracting and retaining teachers in rural, remote and isolated communities. Sydney: NSW Teachers Federation.
Squires, D. (2003). Responding to isolation and educational disadvantage. Education in Rural Australia, 13(1), 24–40.
State of the Environment Advisory Council. (1996). Australia: State of the environment. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
Stern, J. (1994). The condition of education in rural schools. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. M., & Clarke, B. A. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. New York: Springer.
Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Thomson, S., Cresswell, J., & De Bortoli, L. (2004). Facing the future: A focus on mathematical literacy among Australian 15-year-old students in PISA. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. Accessed 2 April 2013.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1990). Declaration of the rights of the child. http://www.unicef.org/lac/spbarbados/Legal/global/General/declaration_child1959.pdf. Accessed 2nd April 2013.
US Department of Education. (2001). No child left behind. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of the Secretary.
Vinson, A. (2002). Inquiry into public education in New South Wales second report September 2002. http://www.nswtf.org.au/files/second_report.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2013.
Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook or research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 756–783). New York: Routledge.
Williams, J. H. (2005). Cross-national variations in rural mathematics achievement: A descriptive overview. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(5). http://www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-5.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2013.
Wilson, V. (2003). All in together? An overview of the literature on composite classes. SCRE Research Report 113. https://daedalus.lib.gla.ac.uk/bitstream/1905/171/1/113.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panizzon, D. (2015). Impact of Geographical Location on Student Achievement: Unpacking the Complexity of Diversity. In: Bishop, A., Tan, H., Barkatsas, T. (eds) Diversity in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05978-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05978-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05977-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05978-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)