Abstract
In this chapter, Bob Lillis offers some insights into why service productivity is an on-going issue faced by all services due to its impact on organisational costs and competitiveness. As he shows, responsibility for the improvement of service productivity usually falls on service operations management. In this chapter, some of the main barriers that underline why service productivity improvement is so difficult to achieve are analysed and strategies that can help service operations managers overcome these barriers are developed.
The chapter frames these issues and then explores them in the context of a successful hotel innovator—CitizenM. CitizenM is a boutique hotel located near Schiphol airport in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The hotel was launched in 2008 with a unique service concept. Its success in recognising and overcoming the typical barriers to service productivity has allowed it to provide an effective delivery of a personalised guest experience while running a highly productive, ‘back’ and ‘front’ office. Since 2008, three further CitizenM hotels have been opened and a further 11 are in the planned pipeline. The case uses data from interviews with staff at the hotel and the Group Chief Operating Officer, Michael Levie (one of the four founding partners) to show how the typical barriers to service productivity were overcome.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The acronym TIMWOOD stands for the seven forms of waste: Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproducing, Over processing and Defect waste.
- 2.
The process of stripping and remaking the bed may be viewed in Part 3 of the CitizenM Hotel multi-media case study (2012). Authors: Dr. Bob Lillis, Dr. Chris Van Der Hoven and Professor Keith Goffin. It may accessed free on http://www.thecasecentre.org/CitizenMcase.
- 3.
The net promoter score measurement tool was introduced by Reichheld (2003). The most important proposed benefit of this method is believed to derive from simplifying and communicating the objective of creating more ‘promoters’ of a brand and fewer ‘detractors’, while seeking to convert ‘passives’.
References
Appelbaum, S. H., Henson, D., & Knee, K. (1999). Downsizing failures: An examination of convergence/reorientation and antecedents – processes – outcomes. Management Decision, 37(6), 473–490.
Armistead, C. G., & Clark, G. (1992). Customer service and support: Implementing effective strategies. London: Financial Times, Pitman Publishers.
Arnheiter, E. D., & Maleyeff, J. (2005). The integration of lean management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 17(1), 5–18.
Broedner, P., Kinkel, S., & Lay, G. (2009). Productivity effects of outsourcing: New evidence on the strategic importance of vertical integration decisions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(2), 127–150.
Chew, W. (1988). No-nonsense guide to measuring productivity. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 110–118.
Dabholkar, P. A. (2000). Technology in service delivery: Implications for self-service and self-support. In T. A. Swartz & D. Iacobucci (Eds.), Handbook of services marketing & management. London: Sage.
Gandolfi, F., & Littler, C. (2012). Downsizing is dead: Long live the downsizing phenomenon: Conceptualizing the phases of cost-cutting. Journal of Management and Organization, 18(3), 334–345.
Greenberg, E. R. (1991). Downsizing: AMA survey results. Compensation & Benefits Review, 23(4), 33–38.
Grönroos, C., & Ojasalo, K. (2004). Service productivity: Towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in service. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 414–423.
Jackson, M., Petersson, P. (1999). Productivity-an overall measure of competitiveness. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop. Intelligent Manufactruing Systems (pp. 573–581). Leuven.
Johnston, R., Clark, G., & Shulver, M. (2012). Service operations management: Improving service delivery (4th ed.). Harlow, England, New York: Pearson.
Johnston, R., & Jones, P. (2004). Service productivity: Towards understanding the relationship between operational and customer productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 201–213.
Karwan, K. R., & Markland, R. E. (2006). Integrating service design principles and information technology to improve delivery and productivity in public sector operations: The case of the South Carolina DMV. Journal of Operations Management, 24(4), 347–362.
Koonce, R. (1991). The people side of organizational change. Credit Magazine, 17(6), 22–25.
Koss, E., & Lewis, D. (1993). Productivity or efficiency: Measuring what we really want. National Productivity Review, 12(2), 273–295.
New, C., Wheatley, M., & Szwejczewski, M. (1999). Achieving total capacity flexibility. London: Haymarket Business Publications.
Ponsignon, F., Smart, P. A., & Maull, R. S. (2012). Process design principles in service firms: Universal or context dependent?: A literature review and new research directions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(11–12), 1273–1296.
Rijers, H., & Liman Mansar, S. (2005). Best practices in business process redesign: An overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega, 33(4), 283–306.
Schmenner, R. W. (1986). How can service businesses survive and prosper? Sloan Management Review, 27(3), 21–32.
Schmenner, R. W. (2004). Service businesses and productivity. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 333–347.
Tangen, S. (2005). Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(1), 34–46.
The Economist (October 2010). Faster productivity growth will be an important part of rich economies’ revival. The Economist
van Looy, B., van Dierdonck, R., & Gemmel, P. (2003). The nature of services. In B. Van Looy, P. Gemmel, & R. van Dierdonck (Eds.), Services management. An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Voss, C., & Zomerdijk, L. (2007). Innovation in experiential services: An empirical view. Innovation in Services, 97–134.
Sink, D., & Tuttle, T. (1989). Planning and measurement in your organisation of the future. Norcross, GA: Industrial Engineering and Management Press.
Hill, T. (1993). Manufacturing strategy: The strategic management of the manufacturing function (2nd ed.). London: Open University MacMillan.
Kurosawa, K. (1991). Advances in industrial engineering. In Productivity measurement and management at the corporate level: The Japanese experience (Vol. 14). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.
Sumanth, D. (1994). Productivity engineering and management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Al-Darrab, I. (2000). Relationships between productivity, efficiency, utilisation and quality. Work Study, 49(3), 97–103.
Jackson, M. (2000). An analysis of flexible and reconfigurable production systems (Ch. 6, pp. 85–104, Dissertation No. 640). Linkoping: Linkoping University.
Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Johnston, R. (2013). Operations management (7th ed.). England: Pearson Education.
Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 61–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lillis, B. (2014). Service Productivity in the Hotel Business. In: Bessant, J., Lehmann, C., Moeslein, K. (eds) Driving Service Productivity. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05975-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05975-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05974-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05975-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)