Skip to main content

Service Productivity in the Hotel Business

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Driving Service Productivity

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

In this chapter, Bob Lillis offers some insights into why service productivity is an on-going issue faced by all services due to its impact on organisational costs and competitiveness. As he shows, responsibility for the improvement of service productivity usually falls on service operations management. In this chapter, some of the main barriers that underline why service productivity improvement is so difficult to achieve are analysed and strategies that can help service operations managers overcome these barriers are developed.

The chapter frames these issues and then explores them in the context of a successful hotel innovator—CitizenM. CitizenM is a boutique hotel located near Schiphol airport in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The hotel was launched in 2008 with a unique service concept. Its success in recognising and overcoming the typical barriers to service productivity has allowed it to provide an effective delivery of a personalised guest experience while running a highly productive, ‘back’ and ‘front’ office. Since 2008, three further CitizenM hotels have been opened and a further 11 are in the planned pipeline. The case uses data from interviews with staff at the hotel and the Group Chief Operating Officer, Michael Levie (one of the four founding partners) to show how the typical barriers to service productivity were overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The acronym TIMWOOD stands for the seven forms of waste: Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproducing, Over processing and Defect waste.

  2. 2.

    The process of stripping and remaking the bed may be viewed in Part 3 of the CitizenM Hotel multi-media case study (2012). Authors: Dr. Bob Lillis, Dr. Chris Van Der Hoven and Professor Keith Goffin. It may accessed free on http://www.thecasecentre.org/CitizenMcase.

  3. 3.

    The net promoter score measurement tool was introduced by Reichheld (2003). The most important proposed benefit of this method is believed to derive from simplifying and communicating the objective of creating more ‘promoters’ of a brand and fewer ‘detractors’, while seeking to convert ‘passives’.

References

  • Appelbaum, S. H., Henson, D., & Knee, K. (1999). Downsizing failures: An examination of convergence/reorientation and antecedents – processes – outcomes. Management Decision, 37(6), 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armistead, C. G., & Clark, G. (1992). Customer service and support: Implementing effective strategies. London: Financial Times, Pitman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheiter, E. D., & Maleyeff, J. (2005). The integration of lean management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 17(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broedner, P., Kinkel, S., & Lay, G. (2009). Productivity effects of outsourcing: New evidence on the strategic importance of vertical integration decisions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, W. (1988). No-nonsense guide to measuring productivity. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. (2000). Technology in service delivery: Implications for self-service and self-support. In T. A. Swartz & D. Iacobucci (Eds.), Handbook of services marketing & management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfi, F., & Littler, C. (2012). Downsizing is dead: Long live the downsizing phenomenon: Conceptualizing the phases of cost-cutting. Journal of Management and Organization, 18(3), 334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, E. R. (1991). Downsizing: AMA survey results. Compensation & Benefits Review, 23(4), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Ojasalo, K. (2004). Service productivity: Towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in service. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 414–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., Petersson, P. (1999). Productivity-an overall measure of competitiveness. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop. Intelligent Manufactruing Systems (pp. 573–581). Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., Clark, G., & Shulver, M. (2012). Service operations management: Improving service delivery (4th ed.). Harlow, England, New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & Jones, P. (2004). Service productivity: Towards understanding the relationship between operational and customer productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karwan, K. R., & Markland, R. E. (2006). Integrating service design principles and information technology to improve delivery and productivity in public sector operations: The case of the South Carolina DMV. Journal of Operations Management, 24(4), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonce, R. (1991). The people side of organizational change. Credit Magazine, 17(6), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, E., & Lewis, D. (1993). Productivity or efficiency: Measuring what we really want. National Productivity Review, 12(2), 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New, C., Wheatley, M., & Szwejczewski, M. (1999). Achieving total capacity flexibility. London: Haymarket Business Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponsignon, F., Smart, P. A., & Maull, R. S. (2012). Process design principles in service firms: Universal or context dependent?: A literature review and new research directions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(11–12), 1273–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijers, H., & Liman Mansar, S. (2005). Best practices in business process redesign: An overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega, 33(4), 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner, R. W. (1986). How can service businesses survive and prosper? Sloan Management Review, 27(3), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner, R. W. (2004). Service businesses and productivity. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangen, S. (2005). Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (October 2010). Faster productivity growth will be an important part of rich economies’ revival. The Economist

    Google Scholar 

  • van Looy, B., van Dierdonck, R., & Gemmel, P. (2003). The nature of services. In B. Van Looy, P. Gemmel, & R. van Dierdonck (Eds.), Services management. An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., & Zomerdijk, L. (2007). Innovation in experiential services: An empirical view. Innovation in Services, 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sink, D., & Tuttle, T. (1989). Planning and measurement in your organisation of the future. Norcross, GA: Industrial Engineering and Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. (1993). Manufacturing strategy: The strategic management of the manufacturing function (2nd ed.). London: Open University MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosawa, K. (1991). Advances in industrial engineering. In Productivity measurement and management at the corporate level: The Japanese experience (Vol. 14). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumanth, D. (1994). Productivity engineering and management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Darrab, I. (2000). Relationships between productivity, efficiency, utilisation and quality. Work Study, 49(3), 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2000). An analysis of flexible and reconfigurable production systems (Ch. 6, pp. 85–104, Dissertation No. 640). Linkoping: Linkoping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Johnston, R. (2013). Operations management (7th ed.). England: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Lillis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lillis, B. (2014). Service Productivity in the Hotel Business. In: Bessant, J., Lehmann, C., Moeslein, K. (eds) Driving Service Productivity. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05975-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics