Skip to main content

Ensuring Participatory Design Through Free, Prior and Informed Consent: A Tale of Indigenous Knowledge Management System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
User-Centric Technology Design for Nonprofit and Civic Engagements

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 9))

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) for development is a growing field of study. There has also been an increasing interest in how access to ICT, such as connecting to the Internet, might impact social and economic development by, for example, giving access to unlimited knowledge (e.g. e-learning), providing health-related services (telediagnosis) and offering businesses opportunities (e-commerce), employment opportunities and access to government services (e-Government websites) (Siew et al. 2013). In all such development projects, two critical success factors are the degree of the users’ satisfaction of the technology and the degree to which the services offered by the technology address the primary needs of intended beneficiaries (Dearden 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, A. (2008). User-centered design considered harmful (with apologies to Edsger Dijkstra, Niklaus Wirth, and Don Norman). Information Technologies & International Development, 4(3), 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, L. E., & Leggett, M. (2006). Towards a metadesign approach for building indigenous multimedia cultural archives. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th ANZSYS Conference–Sustaining Our Social and Natural Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, L. E., Hendriks, M., & Grant, S. (2007). Information technology and indigenous people. Hershey, PA: Information Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • First Nations Centre. (2007). OCAP: Ownership, control, access and possession. Ottawa, ON: First Nations Information Governance Committee, Assembly of First Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, R., & Basu, D. (2011). Scientific and traditional knowledge: The agenda for ‘Mutual Validation’. In R. M. Sarkar (Ed.), Indigenous knowledge in traditional folk panorama: Genesis, development & applications (p. 24). New Delhi, India: Serials Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. P. (2002). Digital collectives in indigenous cultures and communities meeting: Meeting report (S. o. information, trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. P., & Smith, K. R. (2000). Using information technology to preserve and sustain cultural heritage: The digital collective. World culture report 2000: Cultural diversity, conflict and pluralism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitner, K. R., Beckwith, R., & Ilahiane, H. (2006). Development or stasis: The dilemma of ICT4D. People and Practices Research, Intel Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenneer, M. (2010). Memory technologies: Indigenous knowledge and ICT design. Retrieved June 04, 2012, from http://www.ethnosproject.org/site/?p=77

  • Porsanger, J., Guttorm, G., & Árbediehtu (Eds.). (2011). Working with traditional knowledge: Communities, institutions, information systems, law and ethics: Writings from the Árbediehtu pilot project on documentation and protection of Sami traditional knowledge. Kautokeino: Sámi allaskuvla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, S., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2008). A framework towards IT appropriation in voluntary organisations. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(5), 438–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrumm, H., & Jonas, H. (Eds.). (2012). Biocultural community protocols: A toolkit for community facilitators. Cape Town, South Africa: Natural Justice: Natural Justice: Lawyers for Communities and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siew, S.-T., Yeo, A. W., & Zaman, T. (2013). Participatory action research in software development: Indigenous knowledge management systems case study (Human–computer interaction. Human-centred design approaches, methods, tools, and environments, pp. 470–479). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velden, M. V. D. (2010). Design for the contact zone. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Cultural Attitudes Towards Communications and Technology, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winschiers-Theophilus, H. (2009). Cultural appropriation of software design and evaluation. In B. Whitworth (Ed.), Handbook of research on socio-technical design and social networking systems. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N. J., & Blake, E. (2012). Altering participation through interactions and reflections in design. CoDesign, 8(2–3), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Winschiers-Goagoses, N., Rodil, K., Blake, E., Zaman, T., Kapuire, G. K., & Kamukuenjandje, R. (2013a). Moving away from Erindi-roukambe: Transferability of a rural community-based co-design. Paper presented at the WG 9.4: Social implications of computers in developing countries, Jamaica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Zaman, T., Jensen, K. L., Rodil, K., & Yeo, A. W. (2013b). Mobile technologies for preservation of indigenous knowledge in rural communities. Paper presented at the conference on information technology in Asia (CITA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, T., Kulathuramaiyer, N., & Yeo, A. W. (2010). Formulating strategic directions for indigenous knowledge management systems. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2nd semantic technology and knowledge engineering conference (STAKE 2010), Kuching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, T., Yeo, A. W., & Kulathuramaiyer, N. (2011). Harnessing community’s creative expression and indigenous wisdom to create value. Paper presented at the indigenous knowledge technology conference 2011 (IKTC2011): Embracing indigenous knowledge systems in a new technology design paradigm, Windhoek, Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, T., Yeo, A. W., & Kulathuramaiyer, N. (2013). Augmenting indigenous knowledge management with information and communication technology. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 19(1/2/3), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Zaman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Free, Prior and Informed Consent Certificate and Research Agreement

Appendix: Free, Prior and Informed Consent Certificate and Research Agreement

1.1 eToro: Indigenous Botanical Knowledge Gathering, Documenting and Dissemination in Long Lamai, Sarawak

1.1.1 Thursday, March 01, 2012

Institute of Social Informatics and Technological Innovations-Center of Excellence for Rural Informatics (ISITI-CoERI) UNIMAS and Long Lamai community, upper Baram, Miri Sarawak, agree to conduct the named research project with the following understandings:

Introduction

  1. 1.

    The purpose of this research project, as discussed with and understood in the community of Long Lamai, upper Baram, Miri Sarawak, is to gather, document and disseminate Penan Indigenous Botanical Knowledge.

Scope

  1. 2.

    The scope of this research project, as discussed with and understood in this community, is the initial partnership between ISITI-CoERI from UNIMAS and Ngerabit eLamai (Telecentre) from Long Lamai community. ISITI-CoERI will assist the Ngerabit eLamai and Long Lamai community by developing ICT-based data collection and content management systems, training for digital data collection and processing and priding the scientific names of the identified botanical plants. Ngerabit eLamai will provide the services of the telecentre. The Long Lamai community will arrange activities and provide potential local human resource for training, data collection and IK database management.

Structure of the Project: Roles and Actions

  1. 3.

    The development of this project is based on sincere communication between community members and researchers. All efforts will be made to incorporate and address local concerns and recommendations at each step of the project.

Training, Data Collection and Content Management

  1. 4.

    The methods for training, data collection and content management to be used, as agreed by the researchers and the community, are:

    1. (a)

      Community training and participation, as agreed, are to include PDD collection and processing.

      The process of PDD collection and processing is, in essence, extremely simple, and the equipment required is increasingly widely available and affordable. This is the way the process works:

      • The community will provide human resource for data collection.

      • The community will learn how to use digital equipment through games and exercises facilitated by outsiders.

      • The elders of the community will identify and analyse potential knowledge assets and practices in their community.

      • The facilitators will help in designing and developing suitable digital media to manage the knowledge resources.

      • The content messages are collected and processed by the local groups.

      • The contents are shown to the wider community.

      • The contents would be uploaded to secured database.

    2. (b)

      The process of data collection about the plants to be led by the community members (elders and youth).

    3. (c)

      The Process of Content Management, as agreed, are to include:

      • The proposed database would base on the needs of the community. The database will contain information of indigenous medicinal plants which the community uses in daily life. Information includes taxonomic data on identified plant, including indigenous names and nomenclature, as well as their local traditional use. Scientific names of the plants are also part of the database. The database entries are complemented by geographical references, based on satellite localisation of areas where materials have been collected. Voice, videos and digital images also form part of the database.

      • As demanded by the community the database would be a “closed” system, and will not make Penan IK publicly available. The data would be generally considered as confidential and conserved with e-instu concept while governed by the local customary laws. To get the scientific names for plants, the pictures of the plants will be provided to botanist.

Data and Information Management

  1. 5.

    Data and information collected is to be shared, distributed and stored in these agreed ways:

    1. (a)

      The data collected about the plants is confidential and will be kept secured. All the processing on the plants’ data will be held in Ngerabit eLamai Telecentre where the data will be uploaded to the content management system from data collection devices. The processed data will be kept on external drives and under the custody of IK manager (a community member) who will be selected by the community. The researchers and eLamai will be available to answer questions and assist community members. A final report will be distributed after approval from the community members.

    2. (b)

      Each party will be the owner of the data that is created and/or developed by them and the other party is subject to use license conditions determined by the community and need to obtain permissions for the use of and storage of that data. ISITI-CoERI will have the right to copyright and replicate the process, data collection software and content management system, while the data collected about the plants will be in sole ownership/stewardship (and molong) of Long Lamai community.

  2. 6.

    The research publication, reports and other relevant documents will be translated into the language of the community.

  3. 7.

    Before distribution of the final report with any third party the community will be consulted once again as to whether the community agrees to share this data in that particular way.

  4. 8.

    At the end of the project, the researchers will participate in community meetings to discuss the results of the analysis with community members.

1.1.1.1 Funding, Benefits and Commitments

Funding

  1. 9.

    The main researchers have received funding and other forms of support for this research project from UNIMAS.

  2. 10.

    The funding agency has imposed the following criteria, disclosures, limitations and reporting responsibilities on the main researchers.

    1. (a)

      To submit a biannually comprehensive report.

    2. (b)

      At least five research publications and one conference presentation.

Benefits

  1. 11.

    The benefits likely to be gained by the community through this research project are:

    1. (a)

      To preserve Penan’s Indigenous Botanical Knowledge which is at risk of disappearing or being eroded.

    2. (b)

      To strengthen the IKMS of knowledge transfer within and between age groups.

    3. (c)

      To revitalise the indigenous identity through knowledge transferin younger generation.

    4. (d)

      To support the maintenance and integrity of indigenous cultures.

    5. (e)

      To store and codify the tacit knowledge which could be a way to intellectual property rights on their knowledge assets.

  2. 12.

    The ISITI-CoERI objectives of the projects are:

    1. (a)

      To devise possible mechanisms for secured protection, and preservation of IK, through community initiatives.

    2. (b)

      To collaboratively develop an effective and appropriate means of recording, storing and managing data and information.

    3. (c)

      To develop a sui generis database protection.

    4. (d)

      To develop the capacity of Long Lamai community to record, control, access and use of IK by third parties.

  3. 13.

    The main researchers wish to use this research project for their benefit in the following ways:

    1. (a)

      For fulfilment of PhD, to design and experiment.

    2. (b)

      To test the Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework on eToro case study.

  4. 14.

    The researchers will submit a final report to the funding agency at the end of the project. Scientific presentations in peer-reviewed publications and conferences will be made. The final report will be reviewed by community members prior to publication. Scientific presentations will be made and articles published after discussion with the respective community leaders.

Commitments

  1. 15.

    The community’s commitment to the researchers is to:

    1. (a)

      Recommend capable and reliable community members to collaborate in this project.

    2. (b)

      Keep informed about the progress of the project, and help in leading the project towards meaningful results.

    3. (c)

      To get skills, run and manage the project in sustainable way even after project completion.

  2. 16.

    The researchers’ main commitment to the community is to:

    1. (a)

      Inform the community about the progress of the project in a clear, specific and timely manner.

    2. (b)

      Act as a resource to the community on questions related to technicalities of the project.

  3. 17.

    The researchers and community agree to interrupt the research project in the following circumstances:

    1. (a)

      If community leaders decide to withdraw their participation.

    2. (b)

      If the researchers believe that the project will no longer benefit the community.

Signed by:

Date:

Date:

Community:

_______________________

(Signature of Main Researcher)

Name:

Position:

________________________________

(Signature of Community Representative)

Name:

Position:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaman, T., Wee, A.Y. (2014). Ensuring Participatory Design Through Free, Prior and Informed Consent: A Tale of Indigenous Knowledge Management System. In: Saeed, S. (eds) User-Centric Technology Design for Nonprofit and Civic Engagements. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05963-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics