Abstract
The last quarter of the twentieth century was a time of significant upheaval. Unprecedented advances in computer technology began to collapse vast geographical distances and differences in time and made it possible for people from different parts of the world to form connections in manner not thought possible before. Centred around information, this technological revolution has today transformed the way in which people around the world think, work, share, and communicate. The rise in the number of non-state actors, particularly the emergence of civil society bodies such as NGOs, and the increase of their political influence has thrown up significant questions about how best the Internet and its associated technologies may be harnessed to aid the activities of such organisations and facilitate the formation of international networks.
Can the Internet truly augment the effects of those activists seeking to alter the landscape of international relations and advocacy? This chapter seeks to answer this question through an examination of the impact of the Internet on two iconic global networks: the Zapatista Solidarity Movement and the campaign against the Multilateral Agreement on Investment, and the consequences that their innovative use of the World Wide Web and associated platforms in the early 1990s has had on the eventual outcome of each social movement. The work aims to contribute to that body of empirical political science which recognises the impact that information and communication technologies and digital platforms have had on transnational protest and advocacy ever since their development and rapid proliferation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Quoted in Mark Surman and Katherine Reilly, Appropriating the Internet for Social Change:
Towards the Strategic Use of Networked Technologies by Transnational Civil Society Organisations, Social Science Research Council Report, November 2003, p..
References
Abbate, J. (2001). Government, business, and the making of the internet. Business History Review, 75(1), 147–176.
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica: RAND.
Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1—The rise of the network society. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business and society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Chandrasekaran, R., & Corcoran, E. (1997). Human errors block e-mail, web sites in internet failure: Garbled Address Files From Va. Firm Blamed. The Washington Post, July 18, p. A1.
Cleaver, H. M., Jr. (1998). The Zapatista effect: The internet and the rise of an alternative political fabric. Journal of International Affairs, 51(2), 621–640.
Danitz, T., & Stobel, W. P. (2001). Networking dissent: Cyber activists use the internet to promote democracy in Burma. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 129–170). Santa Monica: RAND.
de Armond, P. (2001). Netwar in the Emerald city: WTO protest strategy and tactics. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 201–238). Santa Monica: RAND.
Deibert, R. J. (2000). International Plug ’n play?: Citizen activism, the internet and global public policy. International Studies Perspectives, 1, 255–272.
Denning, D. E. (2001). Activism, hacktivism and cyberterrorism: The internet as a tool for influencing foreign policy. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of crime, terrorism and militancy (pp. 171–199). Santa Monica: RAND.
Fenton, N. (2007). Contesting global capital, new media, solidarity and the role of a social imaginary. In B. Cammaerts & N. Carpentier (Eds.), Reclaiming the media. Brussels, Belgium: ECREA Series-Intellect.
Frangonikolopoulos, C. A. (2012). Global civil society and deliberation in the digital age. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(1), 11–23.
Froehling, O. (1997). The cyberspace war of ‘Ink and Internet’ in Chiapas, Mexico. Geographical Review, 87(2), 291–307.
Gilbreth, C., & Otero, G. (2001). Democratisation in Mexico: The Zapatista uprising and civil society. Latin American Perspectives, 28(4), 7–29.
Gilder, G. (1999). The Faith of a futurist. Wall Street Journal, 31.
Harwood P.G., Celeste, L.J. (2001). Surfing alone: The internet as a facilitator of social and political capital? Paper prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, Aug–Sept. 2001.
Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2004). Social capital and information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Internet World Stats (2012). Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/
Joint NGO Statement on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, NGO/OECD Consultation (1997). Delivered in Paris on 27 October, 1997. Retrieved October 2, 2013, from http://bocs.hu/igaz-a-1.htm
Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. A. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? London: Routledge.
Juris, J. S. (2005). The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 189–208.
Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2010). Open networks, closed regimes: The impact of the internet on authoritarian rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.
Kobrin, S. J. (1998). The MAI and the clash of globalisations. Foreign Policy, 112, 97–109.
Kobrin, S. J. (2012). The multilateral agreement on investment (The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalisation). London: Blackwell.
Krause, A., Stein, M., Clark, J., Chen, T., Li, J., Dimon, J., Kanouse, J., & Herschman, J. (2006). The virtual activist 2.0: A training guide. NetAction.Org. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from http://www.netaction.org/training/v-training.html
Kumar, C. (2000). Transnational networks and campaigns for democracy. In A. M. Florini (Ed.), The third force: The rise of transnational civil society (pp. 115–142). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Martinez-Torres, M. E. (2001). Civil society, the internet, and the Zapatistas. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 13(3), 347–355.
Mora, M. (2008). Zapatista anti-capitalist politics and the “Other Campaign”: Learning from the struggle for indigenous rights and autonomy. In R. Stahler-Sholk, H. E. Vanden, & G. D. Kuecker (Eds.), Latin American social movements in the twentieth century; resistance, power, and democracy (pp. 151–164). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Neumayer, E. (1999). Multilateral agreement on investment: Lessons for the WTO from the failed OECD negotiations. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 46(6), 618–628.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, R. (2002). Global civil society networks online: Zapatistas, the MAI and landmines. May 2002. Retrieved October 2, 2013, from http://www.web.net/~robrien/papers/civsocnets.html#_Toc535832619
Robberson, T. (1995). Mexican rebels using a high tech weapon. Washington Post, 20 Feb 2005, p. A1.
Russell, A. (2001). The Zapatistas and computer-mediated peace. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 13(3), 357–363.
Smith, P., & Smythe, E. (1999). Globalization, citizenship and technology: The MAI meets the internet. Canadian Foreign Policy, 7(2), 83–105.
The OECD. (1997). Towards a global information society—Global information infrastructure, global information society: Policy requirements. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171.
Virkar, S. (2014). Re-engaging the public in the digital age: e-consultation initiatives in the Government 2.0 landscape (Encyclopedia of information science and technology 3rd ed.). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Virkar, S. (2014). Consulting the British public in the Digital Age: Emerging synergies and tensions in the Government 2.0 Landscape. In L. Anthopoulos & C. G. Reddick (Eds.), Government e-strategic planning and management: Practices, planning, and roadmaps. New York: Springer.
Wall, M. A. (2007). Social movements and email: Expressions of online identity in the globalization protests. New Media Society, 9(2), 258–277.
Wartenkin, C. (2001). Reshaping world politics: NGOs, the internet and global civil society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zinnbauer, D. (2001). Internet, civil society and global governance: The neglected political dimension of the digital divide. Information and Security: An International Journal, 7, 45–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Virkar, S. (2014). The Impact of the Internet on Global Networks: A Perspective. In: Saeed, S. (eds) User-Centric Technology Design for Nonprofit and Civic Engagements. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05963-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05963-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05962-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05963-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)