Abstract
Legal information has been utilized increasingly for developing legal applications. We propose a decision support system to solve legal problems by inferring from knowledge base and interpreting the legal explanation to user. Given a legal case as an input, our system provides the court hearing scenario for each legal case. Our proposed algorithm namely EstoppelProofEngine simulates the court procedure using evidence law. Moreover, the system can conclude the court decision and give the legal explanation to user. This paper presents a decision support system called Legal Advisory System for Thai Cheque Law (LASTC). LASTC can simulate the burden of proof principle used in the court hearing process. Moreover, the system also provides the legal explanation to user. The module of LASTC was examined by various legal cases and compared with the benchmark.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Diffen. Procedural Law vs Substantive Law (2013), http://www.diffen.com/
Sergot, M.J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.A., Kriwaczek, E., Hammond, P., Cory, H.T.: The British Nationality Act as A Logic Program. Communications of the ACM, 370–386 (1986)
Supreme Court of Thailand (2013), http://deka2007.supremecourt.or.th/
Supreme Court of the United States (2013), http://www.supremecourt.gov/
Supreme Court of Japan (2013), http://www.courts.go.jp/english/
Boonchom, V., Soonthornphisaj, N.: ATOB algorithm: an automatic ontology construction for Thai legal sentences retrieval. Joural of Information Science, 37–51 (2012)
Waiyamai, K., Pongsiriprida, T.: Applying Association Rule Discovery to Select Laws and Articles for Lawsuit. In: The Ninth Pacific Asia Conference on Information System (PACIS), pp. 143–152 (2005)
Saunders, K.W.: A Logic for the Analysis of Collateral Estoppel. Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 99, 99–132 (1986)
De Vos, M., Balke, T., Satoh, K.: Modelling Legitimate Expectations. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Juris-Informatics (JURISIN 2012), pp. 87–100 (2012)
Cliffe, O., De Vos, M., Padget, J.: Answer set programming for representing and reasoning about virtual institutions. In: Inoue, K., Satoh, K., Toni, F. (eds.) CLIMA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4371, pp. 60–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Truszczyński, M.: Logic Programming for Knowledge Representation. In: Dahl, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) ICLP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4670, pp. 76–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Satoh, K.: Logic Programming and Burden of Proof in Legal Reasoning. New Generation Computing, 297–326 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tantisripreecha, T., Soonthornphisaj, N. (2014). LASTC: Legal Advisory System for Thai Cheque Law. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Tan, F., Stroetmann, K. (eds) New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies, Volume 1. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05951-8_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05951-8_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05950-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05951-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)