Abstract
Project management information systems (PMIS) usually acquired by organizations as software packages are meant to provide managers with the decision-making support needed in planning, organizing and controlling projects. However, the actual contribution of PMIS to project success or performance is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to empirically assess the quality of the PMIS presently used in organizations and to examine their impact on project managers and project performance, based on a PMIS success model. This model is composed of five constructs: the quality of the PMIS, the quality of the PMIS information output, the use of the PMIS, the individual impacts of the PMIS, and the impacts of the PMIS on project success. Analysis of questionnaire data obtained from 39 project managers confirms the significant contribution of PMIS to successful project management. Improvements in effectiveness and efficiency in managerial tasks were observed here in terms of better project planning, scheduling, monitoring, and control. Improvements were also observed in terms of timelier decision-making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This chapter draws heavily on Raymond and Bergeron #x00A0;(2008).
References
Amami M, Beghini G (2000) Project management and communication of product development through electronic document management. Proj Manag J 31(2):6–19
Amami M, Beghini G, La Manna M (1993) Use of project management information system for planning information systems development projects. Int J Proj Manag 11(1):21–28
Bergeron F (1986) Factors influencing the use of DP chargeback information. MIS Q 10(3):225–238
Bergeron F, Raymond L, Rivard S, Gara M-F (1995) Determinants of EIS use: testing a behavioral model. Decis Support Syst 14:131–146
Borchers C (2013) Clubby atmosphere vanishes as costs escalate in Belmont. The Boston Globe, May 21
Brackett SW, Isbell A-M (1989) PMIS: an integrated approach for the management and distribution of project information. Proj Manag J 20(3):5–10
Braglia M, Frosolini M (2013) An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise. Int J Proj Manag. Available online 16 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.003
Cleland DJ, King WR (1983) Systems analysis and project management. McGraw-Hill, New York
CTV.ca News Staff (2006) Conservatives move to disarm long-run registry. June 19. http://www.ctv.ca
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003
DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res 3(1):60–95
DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inform Syst 19(4):9–30
Etezadi-Amoli J, Farhoomand AF (1996) A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Inform Manag 30(2):65–73
Fornell CR, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J Mark Res 18:39–50
Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau M-C (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun AIS 4(7):1–76
Herroelen W (2005) Project scheduling - theory and practice. Prod Oper Manag 14(4):413–432
Igbaria M, Tan M (1997) The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Inform Manag 32(3):113–121
Igbaria M, Iivari J, Maragahh H (1995) Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Inform Manag 29(5):227–238
Igbaria M, Zinatelli N, Cragg P, Cavaye A (1997) Personal computing acceptance factors on small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Q 21(3):279–302
Jaafari A (1996) Time and priority allocation scheduling technique for projects. Int J Proj Manag 14(5):289–299
Jaafari A, Manivong K (1998) Toward a smart project management information system. Int J Proj Manag 16(4):249–265
Jurison J (1996) The temporal nature of IS benefits: a longitudinal study. Inform Manag 30(2):75–79
Keil M, Im GP, Mähring M (2007) Reporting bad news on software projects: the effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving. Inform Syst J 17(1):59–87
Klassen RD, Jacobs J (2001) Experimental comparison of Web, electronic and mail survey technologies in operations management. J Oper Manag 19(6):713–728
Lalonde B, St-Pierre A (2000) Microsoft Project 2000: La gestion informatisée de projet. Editions Vermette, Montréal
Larsen KRT (2003) A taxonomy of antecedents of information systems success: variable analysis studies. J Manag Inform Syst 20(2):169–246
Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT (2003) The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun AIS 12:752–780
Liberatore MJ, Pollack-Johnson B (2003) Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 50(2):164–174
Light M, Rosser B, Hayward S (2005) Realizing the benefits of projects and portfolio management. Gartner, Research ID G00125673, pp 1–31 (January 5)
Mahaney RC, Lederer AL (2010) The role of monitoring and shirking in information systems project management. Int J Proj Manag 28(1):14–25
Peters T, Waterman DL (1982) In search of excellence. Warners Books, New York
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903
Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform Syst Res 13(1):50–69
Raymond L (1987) Information systems design for project management: a data modeling approach. Proj Manag J 18(4):94–99
Raymond L, Bergeron F (2008) Project management information systems: an empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success. Int J Proj Manag 26(2):213–220
Scotsman.com (2005) Athens counting cost of the Olympics. The Scotsman, August 4. http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1137&id=1726242005
Seddon PB, Kiew M-Y (1994) A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on information systems, Atlanta, pp 99–110
Shenhar AJ, Levy O, Dvir D (1997) Mapping the dimensions of project success. Proj Manag J 28(2):5–13
Taylor S, Todd P (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inform Syst Res 6(2):144–176
Teng J, Calhoun K (1996) Organizational computing as a facilitator of operational and managerial decision making: an exploratory study of managers’ perceptions. Decis Sci 27(4):673–710
Teo TSH, Wong PK (1998) An empirical study of the performance impact of computerization in the retail industry. Omega 26(5):611–621
Torkzadeh G, Doll WJ (1999) The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work. Omega 27(3):327–339
Tse A (1998) Comparing the response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: E-mail vs. mail. J Mark Res Soc 40(1):353–361
van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A (2003) Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assn 10(3):235–243
Wang RY, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manag Inform Syst 12(4):5–34
Weill P, Vitale M (1999) Assessing the health of an information system portfolio: an example from process engineering. MIS Q 23(4):601–624
White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management: an empirical study. Int J Proj Manag 20:1–11
Wikipedia (2007) Cost Overrun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_Overrun. Accessed 23 Feb 2007
Winter M, Smith C, Morris P (2006) Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int J Proj Manag 24:638–649
Wixom BH, Watson HJ (2001) An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Q 25(1):17–41
Yuthas K, Young ST (1998) Material matters: assessing the effectiveness of materials management IS. Inform Manag 33(3):115–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raymond, L., Bergeron, F. (2015). Impact of Project Management Information Systems on Project Performance. In: Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (eds) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol. 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05914-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05915-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)