Abstract
The goal of project risk management is to mitigate the impact of risks on project objectives such as budget and time. A popular approach to determine where to focus mitigation efforts, is the use of so-called “ranking indices”. Ranking indices produce a ranking of activities (or even better, risks) based on their impact on project objectives. In turn, this ranking can be used to determine the risks that are to be mitigated. Different ranking indices, however, produce different rankings. Therefore, one might wonder which ranking index is best? In this chapter, we provide an answer to this question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cho JG, Yum BJ (1997) An uncertainty importance measure of activities in PERT networks. Int J Prod Res 35(10):2737–2758
Creemers S, Van de Vonder S, Demeulemeester E (2014) A new approach for quantitative risk analysis. Ann Oper Res 213(1):27–65
Cui W, Jiajun Q, Chaoyuan Y (2006) Criticality measurement in PERT networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Taipei, pp 703–706
Demeulemeester E, Herroelen, W (2002) Project scheduling: a research handbook. Kluwer, Boston
Elmaghraby S (2000) On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks. Eur J Oper Res 127(2):220–238
Goldratt EM (1997) Critical chain. The North River Press Publishing, Great Barrington
Hagstrom JN (1988) Computational complexity of PERT problems. Networks 18(2):139–147
Hubbard DW (2008) The failure of risk management: why it’s broken and how to fix it. Wiley, New York
Hulett DT (2009) Practical schedule risk analysis. Gower Publishing, Farnham
Kolisch R, Sprecher A (1996) PSPLIB - A project scheduling problem library. Eur J Oper Res 96(1):205–216
Schatteman D, Herroelen W, Boone B, Van de Vonder S (2008) A methodology for integrated risk management and proactive scheduling of construction projects. J Constr Eng M Asce 134(11):885–895
The Project Management Institute (2008) Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). The Project Management Institute, Newtown Square
The Standish Group (2009) Chaos report. The Standish Group, Boston
Van de Vonder S (2006) Proactive-reactive procedures for robust project scheduling. Ph.D. disseration. KU Leuven, Leuven
Vanhoucke M (2010) Using activity sensitivity and network topology information to monitor project time performance. Omega 38(5):359–370
Van Slyke RM (1963) Monte Carlo methods and the PERT problem. Oper Res 11(5):839–860
Williams TM (1992) Criticality in stochastic networks. J Oper Res Soc 43(4):353–357
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Creemers, S., Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E. (2015). Ranking Indices for Mitigating Project Risks. In: Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (eds) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol. 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05914-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05915-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)