Abstract
The practice of project management has expanded exponentially over the last 15 years. Currently, one-fifth of the world’s economic activity, or U.S. $12 trillion annually, is organized as projects. Meanwhile, the range of business applications that are conducted as projects has also expanded greatly into areas with quite different characteristics. However, these developments have not been matched by a corresponding increase either in research activity, or in the training of academic researchers in project management. This mismatch is creating significant opportunities for academic research in project management to be conducted over the next 10 years. The present work is a successor to a previous article (Hall, J Syst Sci Syst Eng 21(2):129–143, 2012) on recent developments and research opportunities in project management. It updates the information given in the previous article, and identifies an additional research agenda for project management. The 11 new topics presented support a wide range of practical aspects of project management, and require the use of widely varying research methodologies. The conclusions suggest that significant research opportunities remain open within project management.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
agilemanifesto.org (2001) Manifesto for Agile software development. Available at http://agilemanifesto.org/. Cited 18 Oct 2013
Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1993) Network flows: theory, algorithms and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Artigues C, Leus R, Nobibon FT (2013) Robust optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling with uncertain activity durations. Flex Serv Manuf J 25:175–205
Ashtiani B, Jalali G-R, Aryanezhad M-B, Makui A (2007) A new approach for buffer sizing in critical chain scheduling. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, Singapore, pp 1037–1041
Bartsch V, Ebers M, Maurer I (2013) Learning in project-based organizations: the role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. Int J Proj Manag 31:239–251
Black K (2001) Business statistics: contemporary decision making. South-Western Thomson Learning, Independence
Boehm B (2002) Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer 35:64–69
Brown G, Carlyle WM, Harney R, Skroch E, Wood RK (2009) Interdicting a nuclear-weapons project. Oper Res 57(4):866–877
Brown G, Carlyle WM, Royset J, Wood RK (2005) On the complexity of delaying an adversary’s project. In: Golden B, Raghavan S, Wasil E (eds) The next wave in computing optimisation and decision technologies. Springer, New York, pp 3–17
Brucker P, Drexl A, Möhring R, Neumann K, Pesch E (1999) Resource-constrained project scheduling: notation, classification, models, and methods. Eur J Oper Res 112:3–41
Cai X, Hall NG, Zhang F (2013) Cooperation and contract design in project management with outsourcing. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Oper Res
Chang C-Y (2013) A critical analysis of recent advances in the techniques for the evaluation of renewable energy projects. Int J Proj Manag 31:1057–1067
Chen B, Deng X, Hall NG (2013) Incentive schemes to resolve Parkinson’s Law in project management. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus
D’Amico V (2010) Project management office can cause problems too. IndUS Bus J. http://www.indusbusinessjournal.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%5C%3A%5C%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=895504D9A6B246BAAA04AF0CEF85B2AB&AudID=EEB7C7075C2E462F969310BCC0CAA619
Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (1992) A branch-and-bound procedure for the multiple resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Manag Sci 38(12):1803–1818
Devi TR, Reddy VS (2012) Work breakdown structure of the project. Int J Eng Res Appl 2(2):683–686
Eggers JP (2012) All experience is not created equal: learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strateg Manag J 33:315–335
Esenduran G, Hall NG, Liu Z (2013) Environmental regulation in project-based industries. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Estévez-Fernández A (2012) A game theoretical approach to sharing penalties and rewards in projects. Eur J Oper Res 216:647–657
Estler H-C, Nordio M, Furia CA, Meyer B, Schneider J (2012) Agile vs. structured distributed software development: a case study. In: IEEE seventh international conference on global software engineering, Porto Alegre, pp 11–20
Fazar W (1959) Program evaluation and review technique. Am Stat 13(2):10
Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, New York
Globerson S (1994) Impact of various work-breakdown structures on project conceptualization. Int J Proj Manag 12(3):165–171
Goh J, Hall NG (2013) Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Manag Sci 59(6):1354–1372
Goldratt EM (1997) The critical chain. North River Press, Great Barrington
Golpayegani SAH, Emamizadeh B (2007) Designing work breakdown structures using modular neural networks. Decis Support Syst 44:202–222
Grinold RC (1972) The payment scheduling problem. Nav Res Logist Q 19(1):123–136
Hall NG (2012) Project management: recent developments and research opportunities. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 21(2):129–143
Hall NG, Long Z, Qi J, Sim M (2013) Managing underperformance risk in project portfolio selection. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Oper Res
Hassanzadeh F, Nemati H, Sun M (2013) Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection. Working paper, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio
Herroelen W, Leus R (2001) On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain scheduling. J Oper Manag 19:559–577
Hoedemaker GM, Blackburn JD, Van Wassenhove LN (1999) Limits to concurrency. Decis Sci 30(1):1–18
Hou C, Allen TT, Hall NG (2013) Models of information flow in project management. Working paper, Department of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Hwang B-G, Tan JS (2012) Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 20:335–349
Jung Y, Woo S (2004) Flexible work breakdown structure for integrated cost and schedule control. J Constr Eng Manag 130(5):616–625
Kangas M (2004) The impact of individual differences on pair programming. In: Seminar in software engineering, Spring
Kerzner H (2009) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Wiley, Hoboken
Klastorin TD (2004) Project management: tools and trade-offs, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Kolisch R, Hartmann S (2006) Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: an update. Eur J Oper Res 174:23–37
Kwak YH, Anbari FT (2012) History, practices, and future earned value management in government: perspectives from NASA. Proj Manag J 43:77–90
Leach LP (1999) Critical chain project management improves project performance. Proj Manag J 30(2):39–51
Maltzman R, Shirley D (2012) Green project management. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Moløkken-Østvold K, Haugen NC, Benestad HC (2008) Using planning poker for combining expert estimates in software projects. J Syst Softw 81:2106–2117
Mortaji STH, Bagherpour M, Noori S (2013) Fuzzy earned value management using L-R fuzzy numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 24:323–332
Nerur S, Mahapatra R, Mangalaraj G (2005) Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Commun ACM 48(5):73–78
Newbold RC (1998) Project management in the fast lane: applying the theory of constraints. The St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton
objectmentor.com (2012) Agile/XP Object Mentor success stories. Available at http://www.objectmentor.com/omSolutions/agile_customers.html. Cited 18 Oct 2013
Paasivaara M, Heikkilä VT, Lannesius C (2012) Experiences in scaling the product owner role in large-scale globally distributed Scrum. In: Proceedings of IEEE seventh international conference on global software engineering, Porto Alegre, pp 174–178
Parkinson CN (1955) Parkinson’s Law. Economist, November 19
Parkinson CN (1958) Parkinson’s Law: the pursuit of progress. John Murray, London
Patrick FS (1998) Critical chain scheduling and buffer management: getting out from between Parkinson’s rock and Murphy’s hard place. Available at http://www.focusedperformance.com. Cited 18 Oct 2013
Paykina E, Zhou L (2011) What characteristics are suited to help choosing traditional or agile project management methods for software development methods? Master thesis, Umeå School of Business, Umeå
Pinker E, Szmerekovsky J, Tillson V (2013) Managing a secret project. Oper Res 61(1):65–72
Pöyhönen A (2001) Correlates of innovation in knowledge worker teams. Master thesis, Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Project Management Institute (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square
Project Management Institute (2013) Should you be teaching project management? Project Management Institute, Newtown Square
Raz T, Barnes R, Dvir D (2003) A critical look at critical chain project management. Proj Manag J 36:24–32
Russell AH (1970) Cash flows in networks. Manag Sci 16(1):357–373
Russell RA (1986) A comparison of heuristics for scheduling projects with cash flows and resource restrictions. Manag Sci 32(10):1291–1300
Santosus M (2003) Why you need a project management office (PMO). CIO, July 1. Available at http://www.cio.com/article/29887/Why_You_Need_a_Project_Management_Office_PMO. Cited 18 Oct 2013
Schonberger RJ (1981) Why projects are “always” late: a rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network. Interfaces 11:66–70
Schwindt C, Zimmermann J (2001) A steepest ascent approach to maximizing the net present value of projects. Math Methods Oper Res 53:435–450
Smith PG (2007) Flexible product development: building agility for changing markets. Wiley, Hoboken
Tenera AB (2008) Critical chain buffer sizing: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of the PMI research conference. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square
The Standish Group (2009) The CHAOS report, April. The Standish Group, Boston
Tukel OI, Rom WO, Eksioglu SD (2006) An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 17:401–416
White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management - an empirical study. Int J Proj Manag 20:1–11
Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2012) Robust resource allocations in temporal networks. Math Prog A 135:437–471
Wikipedia (2013a) Parkinson’s Law. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson’s_Law. Cited 18 Oct 2013
Wikipedia (2013b) Project management triangle. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_management_triangle. Cited 18 Oct 2013
Williams L, Kessler R (2003) Pair programming illuminated. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston
Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2013) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: compensation and team composition. Prod Oper Manag. doi:10.1111/poms.12095
Zhu L (2012) A simulation based real options approach for the investment evaluation of nuclear power. Comput Ind Eng 63:585–593
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Summer Fellowship Program, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University. Helpful comments on an earlier draft were provided by Prof. Xiaoqin Wen, Shanghai University, China. A version of this work was presented as part of a keynote address at PMS 2014 Conference, Munich, Germany, March 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, N.G. (2015). Further Research Opportunities in Project Management. In: Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (eds) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol. 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05914-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05915-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)