Skip to main content

Feedback-Aware Requirements Documents for Smart Devices

  • Conference paper
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8396))

Abstract

[Context/ Motivation] A smart device is a software-intensive system that operates autonomously and interacts to some degree with other systems over wireless connections. Such systems are often faced with uncertainty in the environment. Runtime representations of requirements have recently gained more interested to deal with this challenge and the term requirements at runtime has been established. Runtime representations of requirements support reasoning about the requirements at runtime and adapting the configuration of a system according to changes in the environment. [Questions/Problems] The research question is how the results of runtime monitoring of requirements and the system’s decisions about changes in the configuration are communicated back to the requirements engineer to better understand the environment. There is a gap between the written requirements document and the dynamic requirements model inside the system. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that a requirements document are mostly informal while the dynamic requirements model is formal. [Principal ideas/results] This paper introduces an approach to bridge the gap between development time and runtime representations of requirements in order to keep them consistent and to facilitate better understanding. We propose to weave the feedback from the runtime system into requirements documents using a domain-specific language that largely retain the informal nature of requirements. An annotated requirements document helps get a better understanding of the system’s actual behavior in a given environment. The approach is implemented using mbeddr, a novel set of domain-specific languages for developing embedded systems, and illustrated using a running example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bencomo, N., Whittle, J., Sawyer, P., Finkelstein, A., Letier, E.: Requirements reflection: requirements as runtime entities. In: 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 199–202 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Voelter, M., Ratiu, D., Kolb, B., Schaetz, B.: Journal of Automated Software Engineering (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Voelter, M., Ratiu, D., Schaetz, B., Kolb, B.: mbeddr: an extensible c-based programming language and ide for embedded systems. In: Proc. of the 3rd Conf. on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity, SPLASH 2012, pp. 121–140. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Voelter, M.: Language and IDE Development, Modularization and Composition with MPS. In: Lämmel, R., Saraiva, J., Visser, J. (eds.) GTTSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 7680, pp. 383–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratiu, D., Voelter, M., Schaetz, B., Kolb, B.: Language Engineering as Enabler for Incrementally Defined Formal Analyses. In: FORMSERA 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., McIlraith, S., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Automated Software Engineering 16, 3 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bencomo, N., Belaggoun, A.: Supporting decision-making for self-adaptive systems: From goal models to dynamic decision networks. In: Doerr, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) REFSQ 2013. LNCS, vol. 7830, pp. 221–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Voelter, M.: Integrating prose as a first-class citizen with models and code. In: 7th Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modelling (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qureshi, N.A., Jureta, I.J., Perini, A.: Towards a requirements modeling language for self-adaptive systems. In: Regnell, B., Damian, D. (eds.) REFSQ 2011. LNCS, vol. 7195, pp. 263–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Oriol, M., Qureshi, N.A., Franch, X., Perini, A., Marco, J.: Requirements monitoring for adaptive service-based applications. In: Regnell, B., Damian, D. (eds.) REFSQ 2011. LNCS, vol. 7195, pp. 280–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawyer, P., Bencomo, N., Whittle, J., Letier, E., Finkelstein, A.: Requirements-aware systems: A research agenda for re for self-adaptive systems, in. In: 2010 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 95–103 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Welsh, K., Sawyer, P., Bencomo, N.: Towards requirements aware systems: Run-time resolution of design-time assumptions, in. In: 2011 26th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pp. 560–563 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feather, M., Fickas, S., Van Lamsweerde, A., Ponsard, C.: Reconciling system requirements and runtime behavior. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, pp. 50–59 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brinkkemper, J., Mylopoulos, J., Solvberg, A., Yu, E.: Tropos: A framework for requirements-driven software development (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fickas, S., Feather, M.: Requirements monitoring in dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 140–147 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, W.: Implementing rule-based monitors within a framework for continuous requirements monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2005, p. 188a (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oriol, M., Marco, J., Franch, X., Ameller, D.: Monitoring adaptable soa-systems using salmon. In: Workshop on Service Monitoring, Adaptation and Beyond (Mona+), pp. 19–28 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson, W.: Requirements Engineering 11, 17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baresi, L., Pasquale, L.: Live goals for adaptive service compositions. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, SEAMS 2010, pp. 114–123. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kamsties, E., Kneer, F., Voelter, M., Igel, B., Kolb, B. (2014). Feedback-Aware Requirements Documents for Smart Devices. In: Salinesi, C., van de Weerd, I. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8396. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05843-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05843-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05842-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05843-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics