Skip to main content
  • 1404 Accesses

Abstract

The problem of multiple pregnancies hangs like a millstone around the neck of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation for IUI and for IVF/embryo transfer. Multiple pregnancies carry an increased risk of premature delivery (×5), perinatal morbidity and mortality and psychological (and financial) implications for the parents. In ovulation induction the predisposing factor is multiple follicular development as it is for gonadotrophin stimulation before IUI whereas in IVF/embryo transfer, it is purely a reflection of the number of embryos transferred. The use of low-dose gonadotrophin protocols minimizes the risk of multiple pregnancies in ovulation induction and stimulation for IUI whereas in IVF/embryo transfer, the high multiple pregnancy rate can be considerably reduced by employing a selective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy without seriously affecting pregnancy rates in suitable candidates especially when frozen/thawed embryos are utilized in subsequent cycles.

Elective single embryo transfer will hopefully be more widely adopted as methods for embryo selection improve as it is the obvious solution for the reduction of the present unacceptable multiple pregnancy rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hamilton-Fairley D, Franks S. Common problems in induction of ovulation. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;4:609–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG. Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:74–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JW, Schats R, Rutten FH, Schoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertilit: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2002;355:13–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Kupka M, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2318–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nygren KG, Andersen AN. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1999. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3260–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Polson DW, Mason HD, Saldahna MBY, Franks S. Ovulation of a single dominant follicle during treatment with low-dose pulsatile FSH in women with PCOS. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;26:205–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Homburg R, Howles CM. Low dose FSH therapy for anovulatory infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: rationale, reflections and refinements. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5:493–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guzick DS, Sullivan MW, Adamson GD, et al. Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:207–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes EG. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1865–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dare MR, Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Norman RJ. Single or multiple embryo transfer following in-vitro fertilization for improved neonatal outcome: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:283–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:88–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunault CC, Eijkmanans MJ, Pieters MH, et al. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:725–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Oztrk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos fro transfer following in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD003416.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Homburg, R. (2014). Multiple Pregnancies. In: Ovulation Induction and Controlled Ovarian Stimulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05612-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05612-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05611-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05612-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics