Abstract
This chapter examines the doctrines of rule of law and the legal state in a human rights context. Specifically, it includes a philosophical analysis of the doctrines’ utility for the protection of basic human rights values have been confirmed in a practice of the European Court of Human Rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, §47; Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, §29; Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, §43.
- 2.
See also De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, §93; Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, §88; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, §§107–108, 20 January 2009.
- 3.
S.W. v. the United Kingdom and C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, §34 and §32 respectively; Kafkaris v Cyprus, §137, 12 February, 2008; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2), §§92–101, 17 September, 2009; Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v. Russia, §§76–78, 14 March, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dedov, D. (2014). The Rule of Law and Legal State Doctrines as a Methodology of the Philosophy of Law. In: Silkenat, J., Hickey Jr., J., Barenboim, P. (eds) The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat). Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05585-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05585-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05584-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05585-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)