Advertisement

Abstract

Determining the emergent thought leader of an ad hoc organization would have enormous benefit in a variety of domains including emergency response. To determine if such leaders could be identified automatically, we compared an observer-based assessment to an automated approach for detecting leaders of 3-person ad hoc teams performing a logistics planning task. The automated coding used a combination of indicator phrases indicative of reasoning and uncertainty. The member of the team with the most reasoning and least uncertainty matched the observer-based leader in two thirds of the teams. This determination could be combined with other analyses of the topics of discussion to determine emergent thought leaders in different domains. As an example, a real-time user interface providing this information is shown which highlights communications by others that are relevant to the automatically detected, topic-specific, emergent thought leader.

Keywords

communications leader ad hoc teams dialogue act analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guastello, S.J.: Managing emergent phenomena: Nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duchon, A., Jackson, C.: Chat analysis for after-action review, presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balthazard, P.A., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E.: The mediating effects of leadership and interaction style in face-to-face and virtual teams. In: Weisband, S. (ed.) Leadership at a Distance, pp. 127–150 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huffaker, D.: Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Hum. Commun. Res. 36(4), 593–617 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simoff, S.J., Sudweeks, F., Amant, K.S.: The Language of Leaders: Identifying Emergent Leaders in Global Virtual Teams. In: Linguistic and Cultural Online Communication Issues in the Global Age, pp. 93–111. IGI Global (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanchez-Cortes, D., Aran, O., Mast, M.S., Gatica-Perez, D.: Identifying emergent leadership in small groups using nonverbal communicative cues. In: International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction, pp. 39–43 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heckman, R., Crowston, K., Misiolek, N.: A structurational perspective on leadership in virtual teams. In: Virtuality and Virtualization, pp. 151–168. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strzalkowski, T., Broadwell, G.A., Stromer-Galley, J., Taylor, S.: Modeling Socio-Cultural Phenomena in Online Multi-Party Discourse. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayfield, E., Rosé, C.P.: Recognizing authority in dialogue with an integer linear programming constrained model. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bunt, H.: Multifunctionality in dialogue. Comput. Speech Lang. 25(2), 222–245 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Ess-Dykema, C.V., Meteer, M.: Dialogue Act Modeling for Automatic Tagging and Recognition of Conversational Speech. Comput. Linguist. 26(3), 339–373 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bunt, H.: The DIT++ taxonomy for functional dialogue markup. In: AAMAS 2009 Workshop, Towards a Standard Markup Language for Embodied Dialogue Acts, pp. 13–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Convertino, G., Mentis, H.M., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M., Slavkovic, A., Ganoe, C.H.: Articulating common ground in cooperative work: content and process. In: Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1637–1646 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soller, A.: Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. IJAIED 12, 40–62 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fischer, U., McDonnell, L., Orasanu, J.: Linguistic correlates of team per-formance: toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78(suppl. 5), B86–B95 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Budlong, E.R., Walter, S.M., Yilmazel, O.: Recognizing connotative meaning in military chat communications. In: Evolutionary and Bio-Inspired Computation: Theory and Applications III, Orlando, FL, USA, vol. 7347, pp. 73470–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patterson, E.S., Bernal, F., Stephens, R.: Differences in Macrocognition Strategies With Face to Face and Distributed Teams. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 56, pp. 282–286 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duchon, A., McCormack, R., Riordan, B., Shabarekh, C., Weil, S., Yohai, I.: Analysis of C2 and ‘C2-Lite’ Micro-message Communications, San Francisco, CA. presented at the AAAI 2011 Workshop on Analyzing Microtext (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Borge, M., Ganoe, C.H., Shih, S.-I., Carroll, J.M.: Patterns of team proc-esses and breakdowns in information analysis tasks. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1105–1114 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Biron, H.C., Burkman, L.M., Warner, N.: A Re-analysis of the Collaborative Knowledge Transcripts from a Noncombatant Evacuation Operation Scenario: The Next Phase in the Evolution of a Team Collaboration Model. Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Technical Report NAWCADPAX/TR-2008/43 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kiekel, P.A., Gorman, J.C., Cooke, N.J.: Measuring speech flow of co-located and distributed command and control teams during a communication channel glitch. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, pp. 683–687 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goggins, S.P., Mascaro, C., Mascaro, S.: Relief Work after the 2010 Haiti Earthquake: Leadership in an Online Resource Coordination Network (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Duchon
    • 1
  • Emily S. Patterson
    • 2
  1. 1.Aptima, Inc.WoburnUSA
  2. 2.School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of MedicineOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations