Advertisement

“Frogs in a Pot”: An Agent-Based Model of Well-Being versus Prosperity

  • Chris Thron
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8393)

Abstract

Surveys of rapidly-developing countries have shown that huge increases in average personal wealth are frequently accompanied by little or no increase in average (self-reported) happiness. We propose a simple agent-based model that may help to explain this phenomenon. The model shows that under certain conditions, the cumulative effect of individuals’ free choices of employment that maximizes their (self-perceived) personal well-being may actually produce a continuing decrease in the population’s average well-being. Like the proverbial “frog in a pot”, the eventual effect is worse when the onset of the decrease is more gradual. More generally, the model indicates that there is a natural tendency in free-market societies for well-being to become defined in increasingly materialistic terms. We discuss the implications of our model on the issue of incentive pay for teachers, and argue that our model may also provide insight into other situations where individuals’ free-market choices lead to progressive worsening of the population’s average well-being.

Keywords

Well-being economic development prosperity agent-based model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burkholder, R.: Chinese Far Wealthier Than a Decade Ago—but Are They Happier? The Gallup Organization, http://www.gallup.com/poll/14548/chinese-far-wealthier-than-decade-ago-they-happier.aspx (retrieved November 5, 2013)
  2. 2.
    Wong, C.K., et al.: Subjective well-being, societal condition and social policy—the case study of a rich Chinese society. Social Indicators Research 78, 405–428 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Easterlin, R.A.: Will Raising the Income of all Increase the Happiness of All? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27(1), 35–47 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lane, R.: The Joyless Market Economy. In: Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L. (eds.) Economics, Values, and Organization, pp. 461–485. Cambridge University Press (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graham, C.: Happiness around the World: The paradox of happy peasants and miserable millionaires. Oxford University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., Yuan, H.: The China Puzzle: Falling Happiness in a Rising Economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9095-4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, D.: The Study of Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Protection in the People’s Republic of China. Crime and Justice International 22(94), 4–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Q., Zhou, Q.: China’s divorce and remarriage rates: Trends and regional disparities. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 51, 257–267 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B.: Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1), 3–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alliance for Excellent Education, Teacher Attrition: A Costly Loss to the Nation and to the States (2005), http://www.all4ed.org (retrieved November 5, 2013)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Thron
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Texas Department of MathematicsTexas A&M UniversityKilleenUSA

Personalised recommendations