Abstract
This study examines the application of a human-agent based network to the illegal trade in antiquities. Specifically, this study tests whether the hierarchical pyramidal structure proposed by law enforcement in the case of Giacomo Medici’s trafficking ring is accurate. The results of the analysis reveal discrepancies in perceptions of how antiquities trafficking networks are organized, how they operate, and how cultural patterns and representation of criminal activity influence the perception of such network structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Williams, P.: Networks, Markets, and Hierarchies. In: Williams, P., Vlassis, D. (eds.) Combatting Transnational Crime: Concepts, Activities, and Responses, pp. 57–87. Frank Cass, London (2001)
Campbell, P.: The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Transnational Criminal Network: Characterizing and Anticipating Trafficking in Cultural Heritage. International Journal of Cultural Property 20, 113–151 (2013)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C.: Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard (2002)
Polk, K.: Whither Criminology in the Study of the Traffic in Illicit Antiquities? In: Green, S.M.A.P. (ed.) Criminology and Archaeology: Studies in Looted Antiquities. Oñati International Series in Law and Society. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2005)
Bruinsma, G., Bernasco, W.: Criminal Groups and Transnational Illegal Markets: A More Detailed Examination on the Basis of Social Network Theory. Crime Law & Social Change 41, 79–94 (2004)
Burnkrant, R.E., Cousineau, A.: Information and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior. The Journal of Consumer Research 2, 206–215 (1975)
Dawes, P.L., Lee, D.Y., Dowling, G.R.: Information Control and Influence in Emergent Buying Centers. Journal of Marketing 62, 55–68 (1988)
Freeman, L.: A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977)
Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in Networks: I. Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1, 215–239 (1979)
Sabidussi, G.: The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31, 581–603 (1966)
Anthonisse, J.M.: The Rush in a Graph. Mathematische Centrum, Amsterdam (1971)
Stephenson, K., Zelen, M.: Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Applications. Social Networks 11, 1–37 (1989)
Watson, P., Todeschini, C.: The Medici Conspiracy: The Illicit Journey of Looted Antiquities from Italy’s Tomb Raiders to the World’s Greatest Museums, pp. 16–18. Public Affairs, New York (2007)
Felch, J.: ‘Quick takes’, Los Angeles Times (January 20, 2012), http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/20/entertainment/la-et-quick-20120120 (accessed November 15, 2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
D’Ippolito, M. (2014). New Methods of Mapping. In: Kennedy, W.G., Agarwal, N., Yang, S.J. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8393. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05578-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05579-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)