Skip to main content

Integrated Curriculum Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Engineering Education

Abstract

We have now reached a transition point in our discussion. In Chap. 2, we posed the two central questions that any approach to improving engineering education must address

This chapter is written with the support of authors Svante Gunnarsson und Göran Gustafsson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Edström, K. (2006). Using integrated program descriptions to support a CDIO programme design process. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 5(2), 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bankel, J., Berggren, K. F., Crawley, E. F., Engström, M., El Gaidi, K., Wiklund, I., et al. (2005). Benchmarking engineering curricula with the CDIO syllabus. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunnarsson, S., Herbertsson, H., Kindgren, A., Wiklund, I., Willumsen, L., & Vigild, M. (2009). Using the CDIO syllabus in the formulation of program goals: Experiences and comparisons. In Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore, 2009. Available at http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library. Accessed November 25, 2013.

  5. Kjersdam, F., & Enemark, S. (2002). The Aalborg experiment: Implementation of problem-based learning. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Bologna Process. Available at http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna. Accessed November 25, 2013.

  7. West, H. (1991). A criticism of an undergraduate design curriculum. Design Theory and Methodology, ASME DE, 31, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newman, D. J., & Amir, A. R. (2001). Innovative first-year aerospace design course at MIT. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Svensson, T., & Krysander, D. (2011). Project model LIPS. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris R. Brodeur .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edström, K. (2014). Integrated Curriculum Design. In: Rethinking Engineering Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05560-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05561-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics