Advertisement

Other Person-Centered Methods Serving as Complimentary Tools to CFA

  • Mark Stemmler
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Statistics book series (BRIEFSSTATIST)

Abstract

This chapter explains the use of other person-centered methods as complimentary tools to CFA. Among them are CHAID-model (Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detection) as a model for contrasting groups, latent class analysis (LCA) which is comparable to a factor analysis using categorical variables and (multiple) correspondence analysis (CA) which is a technique for dimensional reduction and perceptual mapping. Using small data examples, the essence of each statistical method is explained and its close relationship to CFA is demonstrated. CFA may always be used as a complimentary tool offering additional insight into the data.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Correspondence Analysis Latent Class Latent Class Analysis Multiple Correspondence Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. K. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling – Theory and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Greenacre, M. J. (1989). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis (3rd printing). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Greenacre, M. J., & Blasius, J. (1994). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences: Recent developments and applications. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Haughton, D., & Oulabi, S. (1997). Direct marketing modeling with CART and CHAID. Journal of Direct Marketing, 11(4), 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lautsch, E., & Plichta, M. (2003). Configural frequency analysis (CFA), multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and latent class analysis (LCA): An empirical comparison. Psychology Science, 45(2), 298–323.Google Scholar
  9. Lautsch, E., & Plichta, M. M. (2005). Configural frequency analysis (CFA) and latent class analysis (LCA): Are the outcomes complementary? Psychology Science, 45(3/4), 424–430.Google Scholar
  10. Lautsch, E., & Thöle, U. (2003). Classification and explanation of life conceptions using the case of the 14th shell youth study 2002. Psychology Science, 45(2), 263–279.Google Scholar
  11. Lautsch, E., & Thöle, U. (2005). Identification and analysis of types of personality in a brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Psychology Science, 47(3/4), 479–500.Google Scholar
  12. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghthon Mifflin.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2003) Latent GOLD choice 3.0. User’s guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Stemmler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyFriedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations