Skip to main content

Reclaiming Rhetoric’s Responsibilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 24))

  • 1614 Accesses

Abstract

Although rhetoric sometimes seems to be a completely neutral instrument, in fact it has several social responsibilities. Chief among these is the display of public reason, justifying contingent claims in the public forum. Other responsibilities include creating a community through revealing common bonds among people and providing the basis for human aspirations. These responsibilities are not self-executing but require committed teachers and citizens to carry them out. A special duty rests with teachers of rhetoric who instruct large numbers of students in written composition and public speaking.

This essay originally was presented as the 2008 Rhetoric Society of America presidential address. It is reprinted from a volume of conference papers, The Responsibilities of Rhetoric (Michelle Smith and Barbara Warnick, Ed.), published by Waveland Press in 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jack Selzer, professor of English at Pennsylvania State University, was the incoming RSA president and the 2008 conference planner.

  2. 2.

    This is a form of argument directed against a specific person by showing that that person’s own premises or commitments lead to conclusions that he or she would find unacceptable (Walton 1998).

  3. 3.

    At the time these remarks were presented in May 2008, then U.S. Senator Barack Obama was closing in on, but had not yet secured, the nomination of the Democratic Party for President of the United States.

  4. 4.

    “Sizing up Rhetoric” was the theme of the 2006 biennial conference of the Rhetoric Society of America, held in Memphis, Tennessee.

  5. 5.

    The allusion is to Justice William O. Douglas of the United States Supreme Court, in a decision recognizing the right to privacy although it is not mentioned specifically in the United States Constitution.

  6. 6.

    Former governor of Illinois, two-time presidential nominee of the Democratic Party during the 1950s, and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 1961 until his death in 1965.

References

  • Burke, K. 1950/1969. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold v. Connecticut. 1965. 381 US 479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L.B. 1965. The President’s inaugural address, January 20, 1965. In Public papers of the Presidents: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965, vol. I, 71–74. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J.F. 1963. Commencement address at American University in Washington, June 10, 1963. In Public papers of the Presidents: John F. Kennedy, 1963, 459–464. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Originally published in French in 1958.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A.E. 1974. The educated citizen. In The papers of Adlai E. Stevenson, ed. W. Johnson. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.N. 1998. Ad hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R.M. 1953. The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago: Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarefsky, D. 1979. The Great Society as a rhetorical proposition. Quarterly Journal of Speech 65: 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarefsky, D. 1990. Lincoln, Douglas, and slavery: In the crucible of public debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarefsky, D. 2008. Chaim Perelman, Al Gore, and the problem of reason in our time. Paper presented at “The promise of reason” conference. University of Oregon, 19 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zarefsky, D. (2014). Reclaiming Rhetoric’s Responsibilities. In: Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05485-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics