Skip to main content

Automated Interestingness Measure Selection for Exhibition Recommender Systems

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8397))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Exhibition guide system contain various information pertaining to exhibitors, products and events that are happening during the exhibitions. The system would be more useful if it is augmented with a recommender system. Our recommender system would recommend users a list of interesting exhibitors based on associations that mined from the web server logs. The recommendations are ranked based on various Objective Interestingness Measures (OIMs) that quantify the interestingness of an association. Due to data sparsity, some OIMs cannot provide distinct values for different rules and hamper the ranking process. In mobile applications, the ranking of recommendations is crucial because of the low real estate in mobile device screen sizes. We show that our system is able to select an OIM (from 50 OIMs) that would perform better than the regular Support-Confidence OIM. Our system is tested using data from exhibitions held in Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abe, H., Ohsaki, M., Tsumoto, S., Yamaguchi, T.: Evaluating a rule evaluation support method with learning models based on objective rule evaluation indices - A case study with a meningitis data mining result. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, HIS 2005, pp. 169–174. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICHIS.2005.37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belohlavek, R., Grissa, D., Guillaume, S., Nguifo, E.M., Outrata, J.: Boolean factors as a means of clustering of interestingness measures of association rules. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonchi, F., Lucchese, C.: Pushing tougher constraints in frequent pattern mining. In: Ho, T.-B., Cheung, D., Liu, H. (eds.) PAKDD 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3518, pp. 114–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11430919_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bong, K.K.: A Framework for Objective Interestingness Measures Selection. Master’s thesis, The Sirindhorn International Thai German Graduate School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delpisheh, E., Zhang, J.Z.: Evaluating association rules by quantitative pairwise property comparisons. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW 2010, pp. 927–934. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2010.145

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Delpisheh, E., Zhang, J.Z.: A dynamic composite approach for evaluating association rules. In: The 7th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC), pp. 1893–1898 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geng, L., Hamilton, H.J.: Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey. ACM Computing Survey 38 (September 2006), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132960.1132963

  8. Grissa, D., Guillaume, S., Nguifo, E.M.: Combining clustering techniques and formal concept analysis to characterize interestingness measures. Computing Research Repository (CoRR) abs/1008.3629 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jalali-Heravi, M., Zaïane, O.R.: A study on interestingness measures for associative classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2010, pp. 1039–1046. ACM, New York (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1774088.1774306

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lenca, P., Meyer, P., Vaillant, B., Lallich, S.: On selecting interestingness measures for association rules: User oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 184(2), 610–626 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan, P.N., Kumar, V., Srivastava, J.: Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2002, pp. 32–41. ACM, New York (2002), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775047.775053

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vaillant, B., Lallich, S., Lenca, P.: Modeling of the counter-examples and association rules interestingness measures behavior. In: Crone, S.F., Lessmann, S., Stahlbock, R. (eds.) The 2nd International Conference on Data Mining (DMIN), pp. 132–137. CSREA Press (2006), http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/dmin/dmin2006.html#VaillantLL06

  13. Vaillant, B., Lenca, P., Lallich, S.: A clustering of interestingness measures. In: Suzuki, E., Arikawa, S. (eds.) DS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3245, pp. 290–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, J., Zhu, S., Xiong, H., Chen, J., Zhu, J.: Adapting the right measures for pattern discovery: A unified view. The IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics PP(99), 1–12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xianneng, L., Mabu, S., Huiyu, Z., Shimada, K., Hirasawa, K.: Analysis of various interestingness measures in classification rule mining for traffic prediction. In: Proceedings of The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) Annual Conference, pp. 1969–1974 (August 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xuan-Hiep, H., Guillet, F., Briand, H.: Arqat: An exploratory analysis tool for interestingness measures. In: International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, L., Yu, D.L., Wang, Y.G., Zhang, Q.M.: Selecting an appropriate interestingness measure to evaluate the correlation between chinese medicine syndrome elements and symptoms. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 1–7 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11655-011-0859-z , doi:10.1007/s11655-011-0859-z

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bong, K.K., Joest, M., Quix, C., Anwar, T. (2014). Automated Interestingness Measure Selection for Exhibition Recommender Systems. In: Nguyen, N.T., Attachoo, B., Trawiński, B., Somboonviwat, K. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8397. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05475-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05476-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics