Skip to main content

Process Mining in the Large: A Tutorial

  • Chapter
Business Intelligence (eBISS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 172))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, process mining emerged as a new scientific discipline on the interface between process models and event data. On the one hand, conventional Business Process Management (BPM) and Workflow Management (WfM) approaches and tools are mostly model-driven with little consideration for event data. On the other hand, Data Mining (DM), Business Intelligence (BI), and Machine Learning (ML) focus on data without considering end-to-end process models. Process mining aims to bridge the gap between BPM and WfM on the one hand and DM, BI, and ML on the other hand. Here, the challenge is to turn torrents of event data (“Big Data”) into valuable insights related to process performance and compliance. Fortunately, process mining results can be used to identify and understand bottlenecks, inefficiencies, deviations, and risks. This tutorial paper introduces basic process mining techniques that can be used for process discovery and conformance checking. Moreover, some very general decomposition results are discussed. These allow for the decomposition and distribution of process discovery and conformance checking problems, thus enabling process mining in the large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As will be shown later, there are different ways of measuring the quality of a process discovery result. The term “adequately” is just an informal notion that will be detailed later.

  2. 2.

    Note that “fitness” in genetic mining has a different meaning than the (replay) fitness at other places in this paper. Genetic fitness corresponds to the more general notion of conformance including replay fitness, simplicity, precision, and generalization.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Formalization and verification of event-driven process chains. Inf. Softw. Technol. 41(10), 639–650 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decomposing process mining problems using passages. In: Haddad, S., Pomello, L. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7347, pp. 72–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Distributed process discovery and conformance checking. In: de Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) FASE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 1–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A general divide and conquer approach for process mining. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS 2013), pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Softw. Eng. 1–37 (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/507984

  7. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decomposing Petri nets for process mining: a generic approach. Distrib. Parallel Databases 31(4), 471–507 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Mediating between modeled and observed behavior: the quest for the “Right” process. In: IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2013), pp. 31–43. IEEE Computing Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.: Causal nets: a modeling language tailored towards process discovery. In: Katoen, J.-P., König, B. (eds.) CONCUR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6901, pp. 28–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Basten, T.: Identifying commonalities and differences in object life cycles using behavioral inheritance. In: Colom, J.-M., Koutny, M. (eds.) ICATPN 2001. LNCS, vol. 2075, pp. 32–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., Herbst, J., Maruster, L., Schimm, G., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data Knowl. Eng. 47(2), 237–267 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Sidorova, N., Verbeek, H.M.W., Voorhoeve, M., Wynn, M.T.: Soundness of workflow nets: classification, decidability, and analysis. Formal Aspects Comput. 23(3), 333–363 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., van der Werf, J.M., Verdonk, M.: Auditing 2.0: using process mining to support tomorrow’s auditor. IEEE Comput. 43(3), 90–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distribut. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Lassen, K.B.: Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: theory and implementation. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(3), 131–159 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., Song, M.: Beyond process mining: from the past to present and future. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 38–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van Dongen, B.F., Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Song, M., Verbeek, H.M.W.: Business process mining: an industrial application. Inf. Syst. 32(5), 713–732 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Rubin, V., Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., Kindler, E., Günther, C.W.: Process mining: a two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting. Softw. Syst. Model. 9(1), 87–111 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Schonenberg, M.H., Song, M.: Time prediction based on process mining. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 450–475 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.J.M.M., Maruster, L.: Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16(9), 1128–1142 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: Chi, C.H., Johnson, P. (eds.) IEEE International Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC 2011), pp. 55–64. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Towards robust conformance checking. In: zur Muehlen, M., Su, J. (eds.) BPM 2010 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 66, pp. 122–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Adriansyah, A., Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Alignment based precision checking. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 137–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adriansyah, A., Sidorova, N., van Dongen, B.F.: Cost-based fitness in conformance checking. In: International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD 2011), pp. 57–66. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining process models from workflow logs. In: Schek, H.-J., Saltorè, F., Ramos, I., Alonso, G. (eds.) EDBT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1377, pp. 469–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Badouel, E., Darondeau, P.: Theory of regions. In: Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) APN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1491, pp. 529–586. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bergenthum, R., Desel, J., Lorenz, R., Mauser, S.: Process mining based on regions of languages. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 375–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chandra Bose, R.P.J.C.: Process mining in the large: preprocessing, discovery, and diagnostics. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: On the role of fitness, precision, generalization and simplicity in process discovery. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 305–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Calders, T., Guenther, C., Pechenizkiy, M., Rozinat, A.: Using minimum description length for process mining. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2009), pp. 1451–1455. ACM Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carmona, J., Cortadella, J.: Process mining meets abstract interpretation. In: Balcázar, J., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6321, pp. 184–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carmona, J., Cortadella, J., Kishinevsky, M.: A region-based algorithm for discovering Petri nets from event logs. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 358–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. ACM Trans. Software Eng. Methodol. 7(3), 215–249 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Software process validation: quantitatively measuring the correspondence of a process to a model. ACM Trans. Software Eng. Methodol. 8(2), 147–176 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cortadella, J., Kishinevsky, M., Lavagno, L., Yakovlev, A.: Deriving Petri nets from finite transition systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. 47(8), 859–882 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Curbera, F., Doganata, Y., Martens, A., Mukhi, N.K., Slominski, A.: Business provenance - a technology to increase traceability of end-to-end operations. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 100–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Datta, A.: Automating the discovery of As-Is business process models: probabilistic and algorithmic approaches. Inf. Syst. Res. 9(3), 275–301 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Davidson, S., Cohen-Boulakia, S., Eyal, A., Ludaescher, B., McPhillips, T., Bowers, S., Anand, M., Freire, J.: Provenance in scientific workflow systems. Data Eng. Bull. 30(4), 44–50 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Depaire, B., Swinnen, J., Jans, M., Vanhoof, K.: A process deviation analysis framework. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 701–706. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 498–516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  44. van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Multi-phase process mining: building instance graphs. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 362–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  45. van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Multi-phase mining: aggregating instances graphs into EPCs and Petri nets. In: Marinescu, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Applications of Petri Nets to Coordination, Workflow and Business Process Management, pp. 35–58. Florida International University, Miami (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  46. van Dongen, B.F., Crooy, R.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Cycle time prediction: When will this case finally be finished? In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 319–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. van Dongen, B.F., Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Wen, L.: Process mining: overview and outlook of Petri net discovery algorithms. In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (eds.) ToPNoC II. LNCS, vol. 5460, pp. 225–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ehrenfeucht, A., Rozenberg, G.: Partial (Set) 2-Structures - Part 1 and Part 2. Acta Inf. 27(4), 315–368 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Repairing process models to reflect reality. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 229–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gaaloul, W., Gaaloul, K., Bhiri, S., Haller, A., Hauswirth, M.: Log-based transactional workflow mining. Distrib. Parallel Databases 25(3), 193–240 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. van Glabbeek, R.J., Weijland, W.P.: Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics. J. ACM 43(3), 555–600 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Goedertier, S., Martens, D., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B.: Robust process discovery with artificial negative events. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1305–1340 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Günther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fuzzy mining - adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 328–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Herbst, J.: A machine learning approach to workflow management. In: Lopez de Mantaras, R., Plaza, E. (eds.) ECML 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1810, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hilbert, M., Lopez, P.: The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science 332(6025), 60–65 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hinz, S., Schmidt, K., Stahl, C.: Transforming BPEL to Petri nets. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 220–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  57. van der Aalst, W., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011 Workshops, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jin, T., Wang, J., Wen, L.: Efficient retrieval of similar business process models based on structure. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7044, pp. 56–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jin, T., Wang, J., Wen, L.: Efficient retrieval of similar workflow models based on behavior. In: Sheng, Q.Z., Wang, G., Jensen, C.S., Xu, G. (eds.) APWeb 2012. LNCS, vol. 7235, pp. 677–684. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lohmann, N., Massuthe, P., Stahl, C., Weinberg, D.: Analyzing interacting BPEL processes. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ludaescher, B., Altintas, I., Berkley, C., Higgins, D., Jaeger-Frank, E., Jones, M., Lee, E., Tao, J., Zhao, Y.: Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Experience 18(10), 1039–1065 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: An operational decision support framework for monitoring business constraints. In: de Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) FASE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 146–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Maggi, F.M., Westergaard, M., Montali, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Runtime verification of LTL-based declarative process models. In: Khurshid, S., Sen, K. (eds.) RV 2011. LNCS, vol. 7186, pp. 131–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Byers, A.: Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 14(2), 245–304 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mendling, J., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: On the degree of behavioral similarity between business process models. In: Nuettgens, M., Rump, F.J., Gadatsch, A. (eds.) Proceedings of Sixth Workshop on Event-Driven Process Chains (WI-EPK 2007), St. Augustin, November 2007, pp. 39–58. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J.: A fresh look at precision in process conformance. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 211–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J.: Enhancing precision in process conformance: stability, confidence and severity. In: Chawla, N., King, I., Sperduti, A. (eds.) IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2011), Paris, France, April 2011, pp. 184–191. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking in the large: partitioning and topology. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 130–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Hierarchical conformance checking of process models based on event logs. In: Colom, J.-M., Desel, J. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7927, pp. 291–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Breutel, S., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Verbeek, H.M.W.: Formal semantics and analysis of control flow in WS-BPEL. Sci. Comput. Program. 67(2–3), 162–198 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Pattern-based translation of BPMN process models to BPEL web services. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 5(1), 42–62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Polyvyanyy, A., Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H.: Simplified computation and generalization of the refined process structure tree. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 25–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rajaraman, A., Ullman, J.D.: Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. Reijers, H.A.: Case prediction in BPM systems: a research challenge. J. Korean Inst. Ind. Eng. 33, 1–10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Reisig, W.: Petri Nets: Modeling Techniques, Analysis, Methods, Case Studies. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining in ProM. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 420–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inf. Syst. 33(1), 64–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Rozinat, A., Mans, R.S., Song, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering colored Petri nets from event logs. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 10(1), 57–74 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rozinat, A., Mans, R.S., Song, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering simulation models. Inf. Syst. 34(3), 305–327 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Rozinat, A., Wynn, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Fidge, C.: Workflow simulation for operational decision support. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(9), 834–850 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Schonenberg, H., Weber, B., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Supporting flexible processes through recommendations based on history. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sheth, A.: A new landscape for distributed and parallel data management. Distrib. Parallel Databases 30(2), 101–103 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Solé, M., Carmona, J.: Process mining from a basis of state regions. In: Lilius, J., Penczek, W. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6128, pp. 226–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Staffware. Staffware Process Suite Version 2 - White Paper. Staffware PLC, Maidenhead, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Koehler, J.: The refined process structure tree. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(9), 793–818 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: An experimental evaluation of passage-based process discovery. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 205–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decomposing replay problems: a case study. BPM Center Report BPM-13-09. www.bpmcenter.org (2013)

  90. De Weerdt, J., De Backer, M., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B.: A robust F-measure for evaluating discovered process models. In: Chawla, N., King, I., Sperduti, A. (eds.) IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2011), Paris, France, pp. 148–155. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R.M., Weske, M.: Behavior equivalence and compatibility of business process models with complex correspondences. Comput. J. 55(11), 1398–1418 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data using little thumb. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 10(2), 151–162 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. van der Werf, J.M.E.M., van Dongen, B.F., Hurkens, C.A.J., Serebrenik, A.: Process discovery using integer linear programming. Fundamenta Inf. 94, 387–412 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wil M.P. van der Aalst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Aalst, W.M. (2014). Process Mining in the Large: A Tutorial. In: Zimányi, E. (eds) Business Intelligence. eBISS 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 172. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05461-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05461-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05460-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05461-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics