Skip to main content

Simulation of a Rubber Beam Interacting with a Two-Phase Flow in a Rolling Tank

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1011 Accesses

Part of the book series: Mathematics in Industry ((TECMI,volume 19))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present and validate a modeling framework that can be used for simulation of industrial applications involving fluid structure interaction with large deformations. Fluid structure interaction phenomena involving elastic structures frequently occur in industrial applications such as rubber bushings filled with oil, the filling of liquid in a paperboard package or a fiber suspension flowing through a paper machine. Simulations of such phenomena are challenging due to the strong coupling between the fluid and the elastic structure. In the literature, this coupling is often achieved with an Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian framework or with smooth particle hydrodynamics methods. In the present work, an immersed boundary method is used to couple a finite volume based Navier-Stokes solver with a finite element based structural mechanics solver for large deformations. The benchmark of an elastic rubber beam in a rolling tank partially filled with oil is simulated. The simulations are compared to experimental data as well as numerical simulations published in the literature. 2D simulations performed in the present work agree well with previously published data. Our 3D simulations capture effects neglected in the 2D case, showing excellent agreement with previously published experiments. The good agreement with experimental data shows that the developed framework is suitable for simulation of industrial applications involving fluid structure interaction. If the structure is made of a highly elastic material, e.g. rubber, the simulation framework must be able to handle the large deformations that may occur. Immersed boundary methods are well suited for such applications, since they can efficiently handle moving objects without the need of a body-fitted mesh. Combining them with a structural mechanics solver for large deformations allows complex fluid structure interaction problems to be studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hu, H., Patankar, N., Zhu, M.: Direct numerical simulation of fluid-solid systems using arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian technique. J. Comput. Phys. 169, 427–462 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Monaghan, J.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1703–1759 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummins, S., Rudman, M.: An sph projection method. J. Comput. Phys. 152, 584–607 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Onate, E., Idelsohn, S., Pin, F.D., Aubry, R.: The particle finite element method. An overview. Int. J. Comput. Methods 1, 267–307 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Peskin, C.: Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J. Comput. Phys. 25, 220–252 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Majumdar, S., Iaccarino, G., Durbin, P.: Rans solvers with adaptive structured boundary non-conforming grids. Technical report, Center for Turbulence Research (2001). Annual Research Briefs

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mark, A., van Wachem, B.: Derivation and validation of a novel implicit second-order accurate immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 6660–6680 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mark, A., Rundqvist, R., Edelvik, F.: Comparison between different immersed boundary conditions for simulation of complex fluid flows. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 7(3), 241–258 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mark, A., Svenning, E., Rundqvist, R., Edelvik, F., Glatt, E., Rief, S., Wiegmann, A., Fredlund, M., Lai, R., Martinsson, L., Nyman, U.: Microstructure simulation of early paper forming using immersed boundary methods. TAPPI J. 10(11), 23–30 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Svenning, E., Mark, A., Edelvik, F., Glatt, E., Rief, S., Wiegmann, A., Martinsson, L., Lai, R., Fredlund, M., Nyman, U.: Multiphase simulation of fiber suspension flows using immersed boundary methods. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 27, 184–191 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mark, A., Svenning, E., Edelvik, F.: An immersed boundary method for simulation of flow with heat transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 56, 424–435 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forster, C., Wall, W., Ramm, E.: Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 1278–1293 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Degroote, J., Bathe, K., Vierendeels, J.: Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 87, 793–801 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doormaal, J.V., Raithby, G.: Enhancements of the simple method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer. Heat Transf. 7, 147–163 (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhie, C., Chow, W.: Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J1 21, 1527–1532 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bonet, J., Wood, R.: Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Botia-Vera, E., Bulian, G., Lobovsky, L.: Three sph novel benchmark test cases for free surface flows. In: 5th ERCOFTAC SPHERIC Workshop on SPH Applications (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sphercic benchmarks. http://canal.etsin.upm.es/ftp/SPHERIC_BENCHMARKS/ (2012)

  19. Degroote, J., Souto-Iglesias, A., van Paepegem, W., Annerel, S., Bruggeman, P., Vierendeels, J.: Partitioned simulation of the interaction between an elastic structure and free surface flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199, 2085–2098 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Sustainable Production Initiative and the Production Area of Advance at Chalmers. The support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Mark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Svenning, E., Mark, A., Edelvik, F. (2014). Simulation of a Rubber Beam Interacting with a Two-Phase Flow in a Rolling Tank. In: Fontes, M., Günther, M., Marheineke, N. (eds) Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2012. Mathematics in Industry(), vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05365-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics