Skip to main content

Use of Zero Functions for Combining Information from Multiple Frames

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contributions to Sampling Statistics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Statistics ((CONTRIB.STAT.))

  • 1578 Accesses

Abstract

A class of generalized multiplicity-adjusted Horvitz–Thompson (GMHT) estimators was introduced by Singh and Mecatti (J. Official Stat. 27(4):633–650, 2011, JOS) to provide a unified and systematic approach to existing estimators via GMHT-Regression. The main purpose of this chapter is to present key observations that led to the development of the unified principled framework. These are based on the use of zero functions as predictors in regression which play a fundamental role in statistical estimation such as quasi-likelihood. The key observations are listed below. First, an optimal combination of two estimators of the same domain is equivalent to regression of the simple multiplicity-adjusted HT (i.e., average of the two estimators) on the zero function defined by the difference of two estimators. Second, there are two types of zero functions for each overlapping domain—one based on domain count estimates and the other based on domain total estimates. Some estimators use both types of zero functions as predictors in regression while others optimally combine first the two domain count estimates and then apply Hájek-type ratio adjustments for each sample to optimally estimated domain counts before regressing on domain total zero functions. Third, the regression need not be optimal as it can be based on a working covariance structure to obtain robust consistent estimates; this is in view of the observation that optimal regression estimators are typically unstable (i.e., with high coefficient of variation) for complex designs due to lack of adequate degrees of freedom for estimating regression parameters. Fourth, for any regression estimator, it may be better to use count zero functions via Hájek-adjustment first because the initial GMHT estimator may not be well correlated with count zero functions. Fifth, it might be preferable to use a suitable working covariance matrix than the optimal one in order to obtain a calibration form in addition to making the estimator more stable. Finally, sixth, the basic principles used in the unified framework make it possible to construct new improved estimators over other estimators in the literature. GMHT-Regression estimators are constructed as sums of contributions from each frame which allow for application of standard variance estimation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Binder, D.A.: On the variances of asymptotically normal distributed estimators from complex surveys. Int. Stat. Rev. 51, 279–292 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deville, J.-C., Särndal, C.-E.: Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 376–382 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Folsom, R.E. Jr., Singh, A.C.: A generalized exponential model for sampling weight calibration for a unified approach to nonresponse, poststratification, and extreme weight adjustments. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, pp. 598–603 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.A.: Regression analysis for sample surveys. Sankhya Ser. C 37, 117–132 (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.A., Rao, J.N.K.: A regression composite estimator with application to the Canadian labour force. Surv. Methodol. 27, 45–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V.P., Thompson, M.E.: Parameters of super-population and survey population: their relationships and estimation. Int. Stat. Rev. 54(2), 127–138 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V.P., Thompson, M.E.: An extension of quasi-likelihood estimation (with discussion). J. Stat. Plan. Res. 12, 137–172 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V.P., Thompson, M.E.: Estimating functions and survey sampling. In: Pfeffermann, D., Rao, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics: Sample Surveys: Inference and Analysis, vol. 29B, pp. 83–101. Elsevier, North-Holland (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kott, P.A.: Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse and coverage errors. Surv. Methodol. 33, 133–144 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A.: Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1989)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, J.N.K.: Estimating totals and distribution functions using auxiliary information at the estimation stage. J. Official Stat. 10, 153–165 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.-E.: On π-inverse weighting versus best linear unbiased weighting in probability sampling. Biometrika 67, 639–650 (1980)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.-E.: The calibration approach in survey theory and practice. Surv. Methodol. 33, 99–119 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C.: Categorical data analysis for simple and complex surveys. In: Pfeffermann, D., Rao, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics: Sample Surveys: Inference and Analysis, vol. 29B, pp. 329–370. Elsevier, North-Holland (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C.: Combining information in survey sampling by modified regression. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 120–129 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Folsom, R.E. Jr.: Bias corrected estimating functions approach for variance estimation adjusted for poststratification. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 610–615 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Mecatti, F.: Generalized multiplicity-adjusted Horvitz–Thompson-type estimation as a unified approach to multiple frame surveys. J. Official Stat. 27(4), 633–650 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Mecatti, F.: Generalized multiplicity-adjusted multiple frame estimation via regression. In: Proceedings of the Statistics Canada Symposium on Producing Reliable Estimates from Imperfect Frames, Ottawa (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Rao, R.P.: Optimal instrumental variable estimation for linear models with stochastic regressors using estimating functions. In: Basawa, I.V., Godambe, V.P., Taylor, R.L. (eds.) Selected Proceedings of the Symposium on Estimating Functions. IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, vol. 32, pp. 177–192. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, California, Hayward (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Wu, S.: Estimation for multiframe complex surveys by modified regression. In: Proceedings of the Statistical Society of Canada, Section on Survey Methods, pp. 69–77 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Wu, S.: An extension of generalized regression estimator to dual frame survey. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3911–3918 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Kennedy, B., Wu, S.: Composite estimation for the Canadian labour force survey with a rotating panel design. Surv. Methodol. 27, 33–44 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.C., Ganesh, N., Lin, Y.: Improved sampling weight calibration by generalized raking with optimal unbiased modification. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, pp. 3572–3583 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C.J.: Domain means, regression, and multivariate analysis. In: Skinner, C.J., Holt, D., Smith, T.M.F. (eds.) Analysis of Complex Surveys, pp. 59–88. Wiley, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singh, A.C., Mecatti, F. (2014). Use of Zero Functions for Combining Information from Multiple Frames. In: Mecatti, F., Conti, P., Ranalli, M. (eds) Contributions to Sampling Statistics. Contributions to Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05320-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics