Abstract
In their daily activities, people and businesses are subject to all kinds of governmental regulations. There is a great variety in the setup of regulative systems that aim to enforce a subjects’ compliance with these regulations (Burgemeestre, Hulstijn, & Tan, 2009b). A trend in regulatory compliance is to formulate legislation as the so-called open norms: norms which leave room for contextual interpretation about their implementation (Gribnau, 2008). Open norms are considered to be flexible and adaptable to changing and varying circumstances, whereas rules require constant amendment to meet changing circumstances (Ford, 2008). Instances of open norms are principles or regulatory objectives. Unlike rules, open norms do not describe in detail what is permissible or prohibited; they indicate what behavior is expected by abstract principles or general objectives. For example, a recipe may prescribe to add salt “according to taste.” How much salt must be added depends on the cook and his guests. Through experience a cook learns what reasonable quantities of salt are appropriate for different kinds of dishes. So in general, open norms need to be interpreted and operationalized for a specific context. Interestingly, this interpretation and operationalization process itself is a normative process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., Camino, A. G., Noriega, P., Rodriguez-aguilar, J. A., and Sierra, C. (2006). Operationalisation of norms for usage in electronic institutions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of AAMAS.
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belastingdienst. (2009). Vereenvoudigde rittenregistratie voor bestelauto’s (Simplified Trip Registration for Delivery vans): Belastingdienst Available online at http://www.belastingdienst.nl/wps/wcm/connect/bldcontentnl/belastingdienst/prive/auto_en_vervoer/u_reist_naar_uw_werk/auto_van_uw_werkgever/afwijkende_regels/vereenvoudigde_rittenregistratie_voor_bestelautos.
Braithwaite, V. (2007). Responsive regulation and taxation: Introduction. Law and Policy, 29(1), 3–10.
Burgemeestre, B., Hulstijn, J., and Tan, Y.-H. (2009a). Agent architectures for compliance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop Engineering Societies in the Agents World.
Burgemeestre, B., Hulstijn, J., and Tan, Y.-H. (2009b). Rule-based versus principle-based regulatory compliance. Paper presented at the JURIX’09.
Conte, R., Andrighetto, G., Campenni, M., and Paolucci, M. (2007). Emergent and immergent effects in complex social systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of AAAI Symposium, Social and Organizational Aspects of Intelligence.
Conte, R., & Castelfranchi, C. (1999). From conventions to prescriptions: Towards an integrated view of norms. Journal Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7(4), 323–340.
Dignum, F. (2002). Abstract norms and electronic institutions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Workshop on Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems: Theories and Applications (RASTA ’02).
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Ford, C. L. (2008). New governance, compliance, and principles-based securities regulation. American Business Law Journal, 45(1), 1–60.
Goldspink, C. (2009). Social self regulation in on-line communities: The case of wikipedia international. Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems, 1(1), 19–33.
Gribnau, H. (2008). Soft law and taxation: The case of the Netherlands. Legisprudence, 1(3).
Wet op de Loonbelasting 1964 (Income tax act) (1994).
Sadiq, S. W., Governatori, G., and Namiri, K. (2007). Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. Paper presented at the Business Process Management (BPM 2007).
Savarimuthu, B. T. R., and Cranefield, S. (2009). A categorization of simulation works on norms. Paper presented at the Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 09121: Normative Multi-Agent Systems.
Vazquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., & Dignum, F. (2005). Norms in multiagent systems: From theory to practice. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 20(4), 225–236.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burgemeestre, B., Hulstijn, J., Tan, YH. (2014). Norm Emergence in Regulatory Compliance. In: Xenitidou, M., Edmonds, B. (eds) The Complexity of Social Norms. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05308-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05308-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05307-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05308-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)