Skip to main content

Classical Social Choice Theorems

  • Chapter
Fuzzy Social Choice Theory

Abstract

This chapter presents the classical versions of Arrow’s Theorem, the Gibbard-Sattherthwaite Theorem, the Median Voter Theorem and the maximal set. By presenting the classical versions of these theorems, this chapter sets up the fuzzy versions presented in later chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austen-Smith, D., Banks, J.S.: Positive Political Theory I: Collective Preference. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Austen-Smith, D., Banks, J.S.: Positive Political Theory II: Strategy and Structure. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blair, D.H., Pollak, R.A.: Acyclic collective choice rules. Econometrica 50(4), 931–943 (1982), http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912770

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Blau, J.H.: A direct proof of Arrow’s theorem. Econometrica 40(1), 61–67 (1972), http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:40:y:1972:i:1:p:61-67

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Border, K.C.: Arrow’s general (im)possibility theorem. Tech. rep., Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences (2002), http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~kcb/Notes/Arrow.pdf

  7. Border, K.: An impossibility theorem for spatial models. Public Choice 43(3), 293–305 (1984), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00118938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell, D.E., Kelly, J.S.: The possibility-impossibility boundary in social choice. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (eds.) Social Choice Re-examined (Proceedings of the 1994 International Economic Association Conference at Schloss Hernstein, Austria), pp. 179–204. Macmillan, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, D.E., Kelly, J.S.: A simple characterization of majority rule. Economic Theory 15(3), 689–700 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001990050318

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, D.E., Kelly, J.S.: A strategy-proofness characterization of majority rule. Economic Theory 22(3), 557–568 (2003), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00199-002-0344-1

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell, D., Kelly, J.S.: Pareto, anonymity, and independence: four alternatives. Social Choice and Welfare 29(1), 83–104 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0194-z

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Coban, C., Sanver, R.: Social choice without the pareto principle under weak independence. In: Working Papers 201005, Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies. Istanbul Bilgi University (August 2009), http://ideas.repec.org/p/msc/wpaper/201005.html

  13. Gibbard, A.: Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41(4), 587–601 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansson, B.: Voting and group decision functions. Synthese 20(4), 526–537 (1969)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Inada, K.I.: Alternative incompatible conditions for a social welfare function. Econometrica 23(4), 396–399 (1955)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelsey, D.: Acyclic choice without the pareto principle. The Review of Economic Studies 51(4), 693–699 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Murakami, Y.: Logic and social choice. Monographs in modern logic. Routledge & K. Paul (1968), http://books.google.com/books?id=r-Rg0LcstqQC

  18. Quesada, A.: More on independent decisiveness and arrow’s theorem. Social Choice and Welfare 19(2), 449–454 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Salles, M.: Characterization of transitive individual preferences for quasi-transitive collective preference under simple games. International Economic Review 17(2), 308–318 (1976), http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ier:iecrev:v:17:y:1976:i:2:p:308-18

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Satterthwaite, M.A.: Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10(2), 187–217 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sen, A.K.: Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions. Review of Economic Studies 36 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weymark, J.A.: Arrow’s theorem with social quasi-orderings. Public Choice 42(3), 235–246 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson, R.: Social choice theory without the pareto principle. Journal of Economic Theory 5(3), 478–486 (1972), http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jetheo/v5y1972i3p478-486.html

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B. Gibilisco .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibilisco, M.B., Gowen, A.M., Albert, K.E., Mordeson, J.N., Wierman, M.J., Clark, T.D. (2014). Classical Social Choice Theorems. In: Fuzzy Social Choice Theory. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05176-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05176-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05175-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05176-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics