Skip to main content

The Problem of Invisible Content

  • Conference paper
Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 15))

Abstract

This paper identifies, and attempts to resolve, a serious inconsistency in Alva Noë’s theory of perception. I argue that a key feature of Noë’s enactivist theory of perception, his claim that perceptual content is ‘virtual all the way in’, is incompatible with his ‘p-properties’ account of perspectival content. I will argue that the virtual content thesis implies that p-properties, as characterised by Noë, must be invisible. P-properties play an important role in Noë’s theory of perception, and they could not play this role if they were invisible. This problem, the ‘problem of invisible contents’, must be solved by amending either the virtual content thesis, or Noë’s account of perspectival content. At the end of the paper I will argue that the virtual content claim should not be rejected out of hand, and then try to solve the problem of invisible contents by amending Noë’s theory of perspectival content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28(9), 1059–1074 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimes, J.: On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In: Akins, K. (ed.) Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. Perception, vol. 2, pp. 89–110. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Regan, J.K., Rensink, R.A., Clark, J.J.: Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes”. Nature 398, 34 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Noë, A.: Action in Perception. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hyman, J.: The Objective Eye: Colour, Form and Reality in the Theory of Art. Chicago University Press, Chicago (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman, E.L., Lord, M.W., Reese, T.W., Volkmann, J.: The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology 62(4), 498–525 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Wadham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wadham, J. (2014). The Problem of Invisible Content. In: Bishop, J., Martin, A. (eds) Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05106-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05107-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics