Abstract
This chapter presents a framework entitled “ECORE,” which aims to assist in developing and assessing radical eco-innovations. Our proposed framework seeks to address theoretical gaps and unresolved problems from three research fields – eco-innovation, quality management, and life cycle assessment. ECORE synthesizes ideas and concepts from these three fields into a set of key principles and practices that can further integrate sustainability into business practices. These key principles are based on the idea that stakeholder interactions should form the basis of eco-innovation, that a life cycle perspective should be adopted in the design stage of eco-innovation, and that stakeholder needs must be translated into eco-innovation characteristics throughout the design process. We illustrate our framework with a hypothetical example that focuses on reducing the environmental impacts of carbonated beverage consumption. The chapter concludes by presenting the views of practitioners that were invited to provide feedback on our proposals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We are not able to include references to all reviewed works due to space requirements. A full bibliography is available upon request.
- 2.
References
Akao Y, Mazur GH (2003) The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 20(1):20–35
Altshuller G (1999) The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation, and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center, Worcester
Angell LC, Klassen RD (1999) Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. J Oper Manage 17:575–598
Baiman S, Rajan MV, Kanodia C (2002) The role of information and opportunism in the choice of buyer–supplier relationships/discussion. J Account Res 40(2):247–278
Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Baumann H, Boons F, Bragd A (2002) Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. J Clean Prod 10(5):409–425
Baumann H, Berlin J, Brunklaus B, Lindkvist M, Löfgren B, Tillman AM (2011) The usefulness of an actor’s perspective in LCA. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Towards life cycle sustainability management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 77–85
Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690
Biemans W (1991) User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations. Technovation 11(3):163–182
Birch A, Hon K, Short T (2012) Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools. J Clean Prod 35:50–58
Bocken NMP, Allwood JM, Willey AR, King JMH (2012) Development of a tool for rapidly assessing the implementation difficulty and emissions benefits of innovations. Technovation 32(1):19–31
Brunklaus B, Hildenbrand J, Sarasini S (2012) Eco-innovative measures in large Swedish companies: an inventory based on company reports. Vinnova, Stockholm
Burström von Malmborg F (2002) Environmental management systems, communicative action and organizational learning. Bus Strategy Environ 11(5):312–323
Carrillo-Hermosilla J, González PDR, Könnölä T (2009) Eco-innovation: when sustainability and competitiveness shake hands. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire
Dean JW, Bowen DE (1994) Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Acad Manage Rev 19(3):392–418
Delmas M, Toffel MW (2004) Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strategy Environ 13(4):209–222
Dewald U, Truffer B (2011) Market formation in technological innovation systems – diffusion of photovoltaic applications in Germany. Ind Innov 18(3):285–300
Ferrer JB, Negny S, Robles GC, Le Lann JM (2012) Eco-innovative design method for process engineering. Comput Chem Eng 45:137–151
Fleischer G, Schmidt WP (1997) Iterative screening LCA in an eco-design tool. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(1):20–24
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Garvare R, Johansson P (2010) Management for sustainability – a stakeholder theory. Total Qual Manage 21(7):737–744
Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Res Policy 33(6–7):897–920
Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417
Ghiya KK, Bahill AT, Chapman WL (1999) QFD: validating robustness. Qual Eng 11(4):593–611
Graedel TE (1998) Streamlined life-cycle assessment. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12(1):1–27
Handfield R, Sroufe R, Walton SV (2005) Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Bus Strategy Environ 14(1):1–19
Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):986–1014
Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73
Hellström T (2007) Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustain Dev 15(3):148–159
Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ (1999) The institutional framing of policy debates: economics versus the environment. Am Behav Sci 42(8):1368–1392
James P (1997) The sustainability circle: a new tool for product development and design. J Sustain Prod Des 1(2):52–57
Johansson G, Magnusson T (2006) Organising for environmental considerations in complex product development projects: implications from introducing a ‘green’ sub-project. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1368–1376
Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F, Tsuji S (1984) Attractive quality and must-be quality. J Jpn Soc Qual Control (in Japanese) 14(2):39–48
Kesidou E, Demirel P (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res Policy 41(5):862–870
Kitazawa S, Sarkis J (2000) The relationship between ISO14001 and continuous source reduction programs. Int J Oper Prod Manage 20(2):225–248
Levy DL, Egan D (2003) A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. J Manage Stud 40(4):803–829
Liyanage S (1995) Breeding innovation clusters through collaborative research networks. Technovation 15(9):553–567
Luttropp C, Lagerstedt J (2006) EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1396–1408
Macinnis DJ (2011) A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. J Mark 75(4):136–154
Markard J, Truffer B (2008a) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework. Res Policy 37(4):596–615
Markard J, Truffer B (2008b) Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro–meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(4):443–464
Maxwell D, Van Der Vorst R (2003) Developing sustainable products and services. J Clean Prod 11(8):883–895
Meredith J (1993) Theory building through conceptual methods. Int J Oper Prod Manage 13(5):3–11
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22(4):853–888
Nehrt C (1996) Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategy Manage J 17(7):535–547
Okolo C, Pawlowski SD (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage 42:15–29
Oltra C (2011) Stakeholder perceptions of biofuels from microalgae. Energy Policy 39(3):1774–1781
Poudelet V, Chayer JA, Margni M, Pellerin R, Samson R (2012) A process-based approach to operationalize life cycle assessment through the development of an eco-design decision-support system. J Clean Prod 33:192–201
Pugh S (1991) Total design – integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham
Raharjo H (2013) On normalizing the relationship matrix in quality function deployment. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 30(6):647–661
Raharjo H, Brombacher AC, Xie M (2008) Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: a systematic approach to exploit QFD potentials. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):253–278
Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32(2):319–332
Rusinko CA (2005) Using quality management as a bridge to environmental sustainability in organizations. SAM Adv Manage J 70(4):54–60
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Sandén BA, Hillman KM (2011) A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Res Policy 40(3):403–414
Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategy Manage J 19(8):729–753
Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. D. van Nostrand Company, New York
Sierzchula W, Bakker S, Maat K, van Wee B (2012) Technological diversity of emerging eco-innovations: a case study of the automobile industry. J Clean Prod 37:211–220
Silva DAL, Delai I, de Castro MAS, Ometto RO (2013) Quality tools applied to cleaner production program: a first approach towards a new methodology. J Clean Prod 47(4):174–187. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.026
Stevens RJL, Stevenson RJ (2012) Harnessing environmental sound technology for Chinese SMEs’ environmental sustainable development. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on innovation and management. Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp 315–320
Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo
Tischner U, Schmincke E, Rubik F, Prösler M (2000) How to do EcoDesign? A guide for environmentally and economically sound design. German Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin
Tsai MT, Chuang LM, Chao ST, Chang HP (2012) The effects assessment of firm environmental strategy and customer environmental conscious on green product development. Environ Monit Assess 184(7):4435–4447
Veugelers R (2012) Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating? Res Policy 41(10):1770–1778
Wilkinson A, Hill M, Gollan P (2001) The sustainability debate. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21(142):1492–1502
Yang Y, Holgaard JE, Remmen A (2012) What can triple helix frameworks offer to the analysis of eco-innovation dynamics? Theoretical and methodological considerations. Sci Public Policy 39(3):373–385
Acknowledgments
This work was conducted within the Sustainable Production Initiative and the Production Area of Advance at Chalmers University of Technology. It was funded by the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA). The support is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gremyr, I., Hildenbrand, J., Sarasini, S., Raharjo, H. (2014). A Framework for Developing and Assessing Eco-innovations. In: Azevedo, S., Brandenburg, M., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V. (eds) Eco-Innovation and the Development of Business Models. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05077-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05077-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05076-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05077-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)