Abstract
The growing demand for clean energy sources to replace petroleum has substantially expanded the use of biofuels—fuels produced from agricultural products. For Brazil, instead of representing a hindrance to growth because of the need for changes in the country’s energy mix, this represents a great opportunity to generate value and income, since the country has clear comparative advantages in producing these fuels from renewable sources. The main biofuel in the country is ethanol, made from sugarcane. The country’s cane growing sector has been undergoing intense transformations, with the attraction of foreign capital, opening of new distilleries and intensification of mergers and acquisitions. However, doubts have been raised about the socioeconomic effects of the spread of sugarcane growing, such as the effects on the environment, labor market, social conditions and food prices, among others. This work reviews the papers that discuss these impacts. The results suggest that the expansion in recent years helps to improve the capital-labor relationship; the sugarcane growing is not the cause of increased land and food prices; the environmental indicators in sector is better than fossil fuel sector, or other relevant concurrent; the sector has no significant effects (positive or negative) on social conditions in cane growing regions, and that the sector can contribute positively by increasing local tax revenue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The argument, however, seems valid with respect to the price of food at wholesale. This difference between the consumer price and wholesale price, is possibly due to the fact that wholesale prices closely follow production decisions, while consumer prices also depend on industrial dynamics and technological innovations, that can dampen the effects of any reallocation of land use.
- 2.
The estimate of total fossil energy used in field operations, including the transportation of cane to the mill and the supply of inputs, is 12329.7 MJ/ha/year. Already tickets fossil energy associated with the material used in the construction and equipment of plants representing 2,611 MJ/ha/year, totaling 14940.8 MJ/ha/year.
- 3.
In São Paulo state, 8.1 % of the cane area refers to riparian forests. Of this area, 3.4 % have natural forest and 0.8 % was reforested (Chagas 2013).
- 4.
There is a discussion regarding the responsibility for the preservation of protected areas and legal reserves. The plants produce using own cane, sugarcane produced on land owned and leased areas, and third-party sugarcane, obtained from the suppliers. In relation to land owned and third-party suppliers, there is no doubt about the responsibility, but in relation to leased areas is doubtful.
- 5.
As the vinasse is a valuable organic fertilizer and a source of replacement water into the soil, your use reduces the need for fertilizers and water. There exist rigorous restrictions on the amount of vinasse used by area, so there is no problem of contamination of the soil, and the plants.
- 6.
The limits of use are determined and monitored by specific department, and the producers are required to return the packaging used.
- 7.
In São Paulo, the Environmental Protocol signed between the plants, sugarcane producers and the government establishes the order of the burned areas for mechanization in 2014 and in all areas in 2017.
- 8.
To calculate the spatial propensity score were considered neighborhood effects, as the proximity of county to sugar mill and a dummy variable for those located in states dense sugarcane production. The spatial effects capture both the fact that in a region whose neighbors are producers, the probability of producing sugarcane is higher (dependence or spatial autocorrelation), as well as the specific soil and climate of each region. The second part seeks to control the probability of production take place in regions near the plants (potential plaintiffs production). The last one captures state effects specific, such as legislation, ease of flow of production, access to tax incentives, etc.
References
Abramovay R (2010) Alimentos versus população: está ressurgindo o fantasma malthusiano? Ciência e Cultura 62:38–42, 10. ISSN 0009-6725
Alessi NP, Navarro VL (1997) Saúde e trabalho rural: o caso dos trabalhadores da cultura canavieira na região de Ribeirão Preto. SP. Caderno de Saúde Pública 13(2):111–121
Allen AG, Cardoso AA, da Rocha GO (2004) Influence of sugar cane burning on aerosol soluble ion composition in southeastern Brazil. Atmos Environ 38(30):5025–5038. ISSN 1352-2310. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.019. URL. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231004006144
Alves FJC (2006) Por que morrem os cortadores de cana? Saúde e Sociedade 15(3):90–98
Alves FJC (2007) Migrantes: trabalho e trabalhadores no complexo agroindustrial canavieiro—os heróis do agronegócio brasileiro, chapter Migração de trabalhadores rurais do Maranhão e Piauí para o corte de cana em São Paulo—será este um fenômeno casual ou recorrente da estratégia empresarial do Complexo Agroindustrial Canavieiro? pp. 21–54. EDUFSCar, São Carl os, 2007
Arbex MA, Bohm GM, Saldiva PH, Conceição G (2000) Assessment of the effects of sugar cane plantation burning on daily counts of inhalation therapy. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50(10):1745–1749
Arbex MA, Cançado JED, Pereira LAM, Braga ALF, Saldiva PHN (2004) Queima de biomassa e efeitos sobre a saúde. Bras Pneumol 30(2):158–175
Arbex MA, Martins LC, Oliveira RC, Pereira LAA, Arbex FF, Saldiva PHN, Cançado JED, Braga ALF (2007) Air pollution from biomass burning and asthma hospital admissions in a sugar cane plantation area in Brazil. J Epidemiol Commun Health 61(5):395–400
Avery DT (2006) Biofuels, food or wildlife? The massive land costs of U.S. ethanol. Washington, DC, 2006. Competitive Enterprise Institute, Sept 21
Baccarin JG, Alves FJC, Gomes LFC (2008) Emprego e condições de trabalho dos canavieiros no centro-sul do Brasil, entre 1995 e 2007. In Anais do XLVI Congresso da Sober, Rio Branco, 2008. Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
Basaldi OV (2007) O mercado de trabalho assalariado na cultura da cana-de-aç úcar. Informações Econômicas 37(2):38–54
BNDES and CGEE (2008) Bioetanol de cana-de-açúcar: energia para o desenvolvimento. BNDES, Rio de Janeiro
Braga ALF, Conceição GMS, Pereira LAA, Kishi HS, Pereira JCR, Andrade MF, Gonçalves FLT, Saldiva PHN, Latorre MRDO (1999) Air pollution and pediatric respiratory hospital admissions in São Paulo, Brazil. J Environ Med 1(2):95–102. ISSN 1099-1301. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199904/06)1:2%3C95::AID-JEM16%3E3.0.CO2-S
Camargo-Jr AS, Toneto-Jr R (2008) Indicadores sócio-econômicos e a cana-de-açúcar no estado de São Paulo. In Anais do I Workshop do Observatório do Setor Sucroalcooleiro, Ribeirão Preto
Cançado JED, Saldiva PHN, Pereira LAA, Lara LBLS, Artaxo P, Martinelli LA, Arbex MA, Zanobetti A, Braga ALF (2006) The impact of sugar cane burning emissions on the respiratory system of children and the elderly. Environ Health Perspect 114(5):725–729. doi:10.1289/ehp.8485
Cardona CA, Sánchz ÓJ (2007) Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol 98:2415–2457
Carneseca EC, Achcar JA, Martinez EZ (2012) Association between particulate matter air pollution and monthly inhalation and nebulization procedures in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 28(8):1591–1598. ISSN 0102-311X
Chagas ALS (2009) Três ensaios sobre o setor produtor de cana-de-açúcar no brasil. Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo, Tese (doutorado em economia), Departamento de Economia da Faculdade de Economia
Chagas ALS (2013) Economia de baixo carbono: avaliação de impactos de restrições e perspectivas tecnológicas—subprojeto 2—estudos setoriais: Biocombustíveis. Technical report, BNDES and FUNDACE
Chagas ALS, Toneto-Jr R, Azzoni CR (2008) Teremos que trocar energia por comida? análise do impacto da expansão da produção de cana-de-açúcar sobre o preço da terra e dos alimentos. Economia (Brasília) 9:39–61
Chagas ALS, Toneto-Jr R, Azzoni C R (2010) Energy, bio fuels and development—comparing Brazil and the United States, chapter the expansion of sugarcane Production in the State of São Paulo and its impact on municipal tax receipts, pp 292–321. Routledge
Chagas ALS, Toneto-Jr R, Azzoni CR (2011) A spatial propensity score matching evaluation of the social impacts of sugarcane growing on municipalities in Brazil. Int Regional Sci Rev 35(1):48–69
Chagas ALS, Azzoni CR, Almeida AN (2013) Sugar cane burning and human health: a spatial difference-in-difference analysis. In anals of VII world conference of the Spatial Econometrics Association, 2013
Chandrakant P, Bisaria VS (1998) Simultaneous bioconversion of cellulose and hemicellulose to ethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 18(4):295–331
FAO (2008) The state of food and agriculture 2008: biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. FAO, Roma
Gonçalves FLT, Carvalho LMV, Conde FC, Latorre MRDO, Saldiva PHN, Braga ALF (2005) The effects of air pollution and meteorological parameters on respiratory morbidity during the summer in São Paulo City. Environ Int 31(3):343–349. ISSN 0160-4120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.08.004. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412004001424
Goza F (1997) The labor process among temporary workers in the são paulo sugar industry. Crit Sociol 23:33–63
Hoffmann R, Oliveira FCR (2008) Remuneração e características das pessoas ocupadas na agroindústria canavieira no brasil, de 2002 a 2006. In Anais do XLVI Congresso da Sober, Rio Branco, 2008. Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
Hoffmann R (2006) Segurança alimentar e produç ão de etanol no brasil. Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional 13:1–5
Lara LL, Artaxo P, Martinelli LA, Camargo PB, Victoria RL, Ferraz ESB (2005) Properties of aerosols from sugar-cane burning emissions in southeastern Brazil. Atmos Environ 39(26):4627–4637, 2005. ISSN 1352-2310. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.026. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223100500395X
Lee J (1997) Biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. J Biotechnol 56:1–24
Lin Y, Tanaka S (2006) Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:627–642
Macedo IC (1998) Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances in bio-ethanol production and utilization in Brazil. Biomass Bioenergy 14:77–81
Macedo IC, Seabra JEA, Silva EAR (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and prediction for 2020. Biomass Bionergy 32:582–595
Macrelli S, Mogensen J, Zacchi G (2012) Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugarbased ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 5(1):22. ISSN 1754-6834. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-22. URL http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/5/1/22
Mazzoli-Rocha F, Magalhães CB, Malm O, Saldiva PH, Zin WA, Faffe DS (2008) Comparative respiratory toxicity of particles produced by traffic and sugar cane burning. Environ Res 108(1):35–41
Moraes MAFD (2007) Indicadores do mercado de trabalho do sistema agroindustrial da cana-de-açucar do Brasil no período 1992–2005. Estudos Econômicos 37:875–902, 12. ISSN 0101-4161
Oliveira MD (2008) Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems, chapter Sugarcane and ethanol production and carbon dioxide balances, pp 215–230. Springer, Berlin
Oliveira MD, Vaughan BE, Rykiel-Jr EJ (2005) Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances and ecological footprint. Bioscience 55:593–602
Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT (2000) Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. part i. Sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 74:69–80
Piketty MG, Menezes TM, Duarte JBNA (2008) Sugar cane in Brazil, poverty and equity: evidence for the 1992–2006 period. In Anais do XXXIV Congresso da ANPEC, Salvador, 2008. ANPEC
Pimentel D, Patzek T (2008) Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems, chapter Ethanol production: energy and economic issues related to U.S. and Brazilian sugarcane, pp 357–371. Springer, New York
Ramos P (2007) O futuro da ocupaç ão na agroindústria canavieira do brasil: uma discussão dos trabalhos disponíveis e um exercício de estimação. Informações Econômicas 37(11):69–75
Ribeiro H (2008) Queimadas de cana-de-açúcar no Brasil: efeitos à saúde respiratória. Revista de Saúde Pública 42:370–376
Roseiro MNV (2002) Morbidade por problemas respiratórios em Ribeirão Preto-SP, de 1995 a 2001, segundo indicadores ambientais, sociais e econômicos. Universidade de São Paulo, escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Tese de doutorado
Santos FA, de Queiróz JH, Colodette JL, Fernandes SA, Guimarães VM, Rezende ST (2012) Potencial da palha de cana-de-aç úcar para produç ão de etanol. Quim Nova 35(5):1004–1010
Scopinho RA (2000) Qualidade total, saúde e trabalho: Uma análise em empresas sucroalcooleiras paulistas. RAC 4(1):93–112
Sicard P, Mangin A, Hebel P, Malléa P (2010) Detection and estimation trends linked to air quality and mortality on French Riviera over the 1990–2005 period. Sci Total Environ 408(8):1943–1950
Silva MAM (2005) A face oculta do trabalho: Migrantes nas usinas canavieiras de são paulo. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Trabajo (RELET) 17:31–54
Silva R (2008) Setor sucroalcooleiro no estado de São Paulo: mensurando impactos sócio-econômicos. In Anais do I Workshop do Observatório do Setor Sucroalcooleiro, Ribeirão Preto
Soares LHB, Alves BJR, Urquiaga RM, Boddey S (2009) Mitigação das emissões de gases efeito estufa pelo uso de etanol da cana-de-açúcar produzido no brasil. Circular técnica 27, Embrapa, Seopédica, RJ
Soccol CR, de Souza Vandenberghe LP, Pedroni Medeiros AB, Grace Karp S, Buckeridge M, Ramos LP, Pitarelo AP, Ferreira-Leitã£o V, Fortes Gottschalk LM, Ferrara MA, da Silva Bon EP, Pepe de Moraes LM, de Amorim Araújo J, Gonçalves Torres FA (2010) Bioethanol from lignocelluloses: status and perspectives in Brazil. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4820–4825. ISSN 0960-8524. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.067. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852409015727
Staduto JAR, Shikida PFA, Bacha JC (2004) Alteração na composição da mão-de-obra assalariada na agropecuária brasileira. Agricultura em São Paulo 51(2):57–70
Toneto-Jr R, Liboni LB (2008) Evolução recente do mercado de trabalho da cana-de-açúcar no brasil (1995–2006). Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais 10(3):455–474
Uriarte M, Yackulic CB, Cooper T, Flynn D, Cortes M, Crk T, Cullman G, McGinty M, Sircely J (2009) Expansion of sugarcane production in São Paulo, Brazil: implications for fire occurrence and respiratory health. Agric Ecosyst Environ 132:48–56. ISSN 0167-8809. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.018. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880909000760
Urquiaga A, Alves BJR, Boddey RM (2005) Produç ão de biocombustíveis—a questão do balanço energético. Revista de Política Agrícola. Brasília, 14:42–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chagas, A.L.S. (2014). Socio-Economic and Ambient Impacts of Sugarcane Expansion in Brazil: Effects of the Second Generation Ethanol Production. In: da Silva, S., Chandel, A. (eds) Biofuels in Brazil. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05020-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05020-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05019-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05020-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)