Abstract
This chapter presents a summary of middle and high school students’ understanding of energy and the differences and similarities in the ideas that the middle and high school students hold. The student data are a result of the field testing of items aligned to ideas about forms of energy, energy transformations, energy transfer, and conservation of energy that were administered to 23,744 middle and high school students in 48 states across the U.S. between 2009 and 2010. Rasch modeling was used to analyze the data, and the data had a good fit to the model. Analysis of covariance, controlling for gender and English as the student’s primary language, showed a steady increase in student understanding of key energy concepts between 7th and 12th grades. Option probability curves provided additional information about the progression of students’ understanding of energy concepts and the persistence of a number of energy-related misconceptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy, volume 1. Washington, DC: AAAS/NSTA.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2007). Atlas of science literacy, volume 2. Washington, DC: AAAS/NSTA.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2013). AAAS Project 2061 Science Assessment website. Retrieved October 31, 2012. Available from http://assessment.aaas.org/
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brook, A., & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students’ understanding of energy: Full report. Leeds: The University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science Education and Mathematics Education.
Brook, A., Briggs, H., Bell, B., & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students’ understanding of heat: Full report. Leeds: The University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science Education and Mathematics Education.
Chabalengula, V. M., Sanders, M., & Frackson, M. (2012). Diagnosing students’ understanding of energy and its related concepts in biological context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 241–266.
Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary students’ conceptions of the conduction of heat: Bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176–182.
DeBoer, G. E., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & Gogos, A. (2007, March–April). Assessment linked to science learning goals: Probing student thinking during item development. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching annual conference, New Orleans, LA.
DeBoer, G. E., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Gogos, A., Michiels, A., Regan, T., & Wilson, P. (2008a). Assessment linked to science learning goals: Probing student thinking through assessment. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Stearns (Eds.), Assessing student learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 231–252). Arlington: NSTA Press.
DeBoer, G. E., Lee, H. S., & Husic, F. (2008b). Assessing integrated understanding of science. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy (pp. 153–182). New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
Finegold, M., & Trumper, R. (1989). Categorizing pupils’ explanatory frameworks in energy as a means to the development of a teaching approach. Research in Science Education, 19(1), 97–110.
Fischbein, E., Stavy, R., & Ma-Naim, H. (1989). The psychological structure of naive impetus conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(3), 327–336.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J. S., Nordine, J. C., Plummer, J., Rogat, A., & Switzer, A. C. (2005). How can I use trash to power my stereo? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Center for Highly Interactive Classrooms, Curricula, & Computing in Education.
Fortus, D., Weizman, A., Nordine, J., Jin, H., & Abdel-Kareem, H. (2012). Why do some things stop and others keep going? In J. Krajcik, B. Reiser, D. Fortus, L. Sutherland, & D. Fortus (Eds.), Investigating and questioning our world through science and technology (IQWST). Norwalk: Sangari Active Science.
Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2009, April). Using content-aligned assessment to probe middle school students’ understanding of ideas about energy. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching annual conference, Garden Grove, CA.
Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2010, March). Probing middle and high school students’ understanding of energy transformation, energy transfer, and conservation of energy using content-aligned assessment items. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching annual conference, Philadelphia, PA.
Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics – An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106.
Kruger, C. (1990). Some primary teachers’ ideas about energy. Physics Education, 25(2), 86–91.
Kruger, C., Palacino, D., & Summers, M. (1992). Surveys of English primary teachers’ conceptions of force, energy, and materials. Science Education, 76(4), 339–351.
Lee, H. S., & Liu, O. L. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688.
Leggett, M. (2003). Lessons that non-scientists can teach us about the concept of energy: A human-centered approach. Physics Education, 38(2), 130–134.
Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps® (Version 3.75.0) [Computer Software]. Beaverton: Winsteps.com. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/
Liu, X., & Boone, W. J. (2006). Introduction to Rasch measurement in science education. In X. Liu & W. J. Boone (Eds.), Applications of Rasch measurement in science education (pp. 1–22). Maple Grove: JAM Press.
Liu, X., & Collard, S. (2005). Using the Rasch model to validate stages of understanding the energy concept. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(2), 224–241.
Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental growth in students’ concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493–517.
Loverude, M. E. (2004, August). Student understanding of gravitational potential energy and the motion of bodies in a gravitational field. Paper presented at the Physics Education Research conference, California State University, Sacramento, CA.
McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 122–130.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2012). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 162–188.
Newell, A., & Ross, K. (1996). Children’s conception of thermal conduction – Or the story of a woolen hat. School Science Review, 78(282), 33–38.
Nicholls, G., & Ogborn, J. (1993). Dimensions of children’s conceptions of energy. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 73–81.
Papadouris, N., Constantinou, C. P., & Kyratsi, T. (2008). Students’ use of the energy model to account for changes in physical systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 444–469.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sadler, P. M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 265–296.
Solomon, J. (1983). Messy, contradictory and obstinately persistent: A study of children’s out-of-school ideas about energy. School Science Review, 65(231), 225–229.
Stead, B. (1980). Energy (Working Paper No. 17). In Learning in science project. Hamilton: Science Education Research Unit, University of Waikato.
Stern, L., & Ahlgren, A. (2002). Analysis of students’ assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 889–910.
Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (1993). Long term impact of a new approach to teacher education for primary science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Educational Research Association, Liverpool, England.
Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept – Part one. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 343–354.
Trumper, R. (1993). Children’s energy concepts: A cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 139–148.
Trumper, R. (1998). A longitudinal study of physics students’ conceptions of energy in preservice training for high school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(4), 311–318.
Trumper, R., & Gorsky, P. (1993). Learning about energy: The influence of alternative frameworks, cognitive levels, and closed-mindedness. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 637–648.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2012). Energy literacy: Essential principles and fundamental concepts for energy education. Washington, DC: Author.
Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213–217.
Wiser, M. (1986). The differentiation of heat and temperature: An evaluation of the effect of microcomputer teaching on students’ misconceptions (Technical Report). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1999). Measurement essentials. Wilmington: Wide Range.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (2004). Making measures. Chicago: Phaneron Press.
Acknowledgements
The research reported here was supported by the National Science Foundation, through Grants # ESI 0227557 and ESI 0352473, and the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A120138 to the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute, the U.S. Department of Education, or the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herrmann-Abell, C.F., DeBoer, G.E. (2014). Developing and Using Distractor-Driven Multiple-Choice Assessments Aligned to Ideas About Energy Forms, Transformation, Transfer, and Conservation. In: Chen, R., et al. Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05016-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05017-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)