Skip to main content

Abstract

The variability of claim costs represents an important risk component, which should be taken into account while implementing the internal models for solvency evaluation of an insurance undertaking. This component can generate differences between future payments for claims and the provisions set aside for the same claims (run-off error). If the liability concerning the claims reserve is evaluated using synthetic methods, than the run-off error depends on the statistical method adopted. This work focuses on measuring the run-off error with reference to claims reserves evaluation methods applied to simulated run-off matrices for the claims-settlement development. The results from the numerical implementations provide us with useful insights for a rational selection of the statistical-actuarial method for the claims reserve evaluation on an integrated risk management framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In general, for the distribution of the claims outstanding reserve, other than the expected value we can estimate moments of order higher than 1 or even particular quantiles.

References

  1. Bornhuetter, R.L., Ferguson, R.E.: The actuary and IBNR. Proc. Casualty Actuar. Soc. LIX, 181–195 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buhlmann, H., Straub, E., Schnieper, R.: Claims reserves in casualty insurance based on a probabilistic model. Mitt. - Schweiz. Ver. Versicher.math. 80(1), 21–45 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Actuaries: Claims Reserving Manual. Lond. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mack, T.: Measuring the variability of Chain Ladder reserve estimates. In: Casualty Actuar. Soc. Forum Spring, pp. 101–182 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mack, T.: The prediction error for Bornhuetter-Ferguson. ASTIN Bull. 38, 87–103 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Narayan, P., Warthen, T.: A comparative study of the performance of loss reserving methods through simulation. In: Casualty Actuar. Soc. Forum Summer, vol. I, pp. 175–195 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pentikainen, T., Rantala, J.: A simulation procedure for comparing different claims reserving methods. ASTIN Bull. 22, 191–216 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanard, J.N.: A simulation test of prediction errors of loss reserve estimation techniques. Proc. Casualty Actuar. Soc. LXXII, 181–195 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, G.C.: Claims Reserving in Non-life Insurance. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Verra, R.J.: A Bayesian generalised linear model for the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method of claims reserving. N. Am. Actuar. J. 8, 67–89 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Melisi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Ortona, N.E., Melisi, G. (2014). Run-Off Error in the Outstanding Claims Reserves Evaluation. In: Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05014-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics