Abstract
The simplest and easiest way to design a deformable rockfall barrier is to compare the energy level calculated with the rockfall trajectory analyses and the results obtained by the full-scale crash tests performed according to the European Guideline ETAG 027. This calculation approach presents a lot of incertitude due to the difficulties to define the input data, the installation issues and the different performance of a barrier with a configuration that differ from the tested one. Designers should take into account all these aspects and introduce in their design safety coefficients able to increase the energies acting on the structure and reduce the resistances of the fence. Moreover, the performances in term of maximum elongation and residual height should be considered for an accurate design. Maccaferri, which has 130+ years of experiences in the rockfall protection field, uses the European guideline ETAG 027:2008 and the Italian standard UNI 11211:2012 as references for rockfall fence designs. The paper describes the calculation steps and the aspect to be considered in order to carry out a correct design at the service or ultimate limit state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AASHTO (2003) Recommended procedures for the testing of rock-fall. Standing committee on highways prepared by Jerry D. Higgins
Azzoni A, La Barbera G, Zaninetti A (1995) Analysis and prediction or rockfalls using a mathematical model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 32:709–724
Brunet G, Giacchetti G, Grimod A (2013) Rockfall barrier behavior under multiple impact events. 64th highway geology symposium, New Hampshire, USA, 9–12 September 2013
EOTA (2008) ETAG 027: guideline for European technical approval of falling rock protection kits, Brussels. http://www.eota.be
Giaccheti G, Zotti IM (2012) Design approach for rockfall barriers. Proceedings of the XI national congress of geotechnic, San José, Costa Rica, 9–10 August 2012
Giani GP (1992) Rock slope stability analysis. Balkema, Rotterdam
Giani GP (1997) Rockfall. Hevelius Edizioni, Benevento
Grimod A, Giacchetti G (2013a) High energy rockfall barriers: a design procedure for different applications. 23rd world mining congress, Montreal, QC, Canada, 11–15 August 2013
Grimod A, Giacchetti G (2013b) New design approach for rockfall barriers. EuRock 2013, Wroclaw, Poland, 23–26 September 2013
Hoek E (1986) Rockfall: a computer program for predicting rockfall trajectories. Unpublished internal notes, Golder Associates, Vancouver
Peila D, Oggeri C, Baratono P (2006) Barriere paramassi a rete. Interventi e dimensionamento. GEAM, Quaderni di studio e di documentazione n26
Spang RM (1987) Protection against rockfalls – stepchild in the design or rock slopes. 6th international congress on rock mechanics, Montreal, Canada. pp 551–557
UNI (2012) UNI 112111-4: 2012 rockfall protective measures – Part 4: definitive and executive design. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Milano Italia (in Italian). http://www.uni.com
WSL (2001) Guideline for the approval of rockfall protection kits. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Berne, Switzerland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grimod, A., Giacchetti, G. (2014). Design Approach for Rockfall Barriers Tested According to ETAG 027. In: Sassa, K., Canuti, P., Yin, Y. (eds) Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04996-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04996-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04995-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04996-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)