Skip to main content

Design Approach for Rockfall Barriers Tested According to ETAG 027

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment

Abstract

The simplest and easiest way to design a deformable rockfall barrier is to compare the energy level calculated with the rockfall trajectory analyses and the results obtained by the full-scale crash tests performed according to the European Guideline ETAG 027. This calculation approach presents a lot of incertitude due to the difficulties to define the input data, the installation issues and the different performance of a barrier with a configuration that differ from the tested one. Designers should take into account all these aspects and introduce in their design safety coefficients able to increase the energies acting on the structure and reduce the resistances of the fence. Moreover, the performances in term of maximum elongation and residual height should be considered for an accurate design. Maccaferri, which has 130+ years of experiences in the rockfall protection field, uses the European guideline ETAG 027:2008 and the Italian standard UNI 11211:2012 as references for rockfall fence designs. The paper describes the calculation steps and the aspect to be considered in order to carry out a correct design at the service or ultimate limit state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AASHTO (2003) Recommended procedures for the testing of rock-fall. Standing committee on highways prepared by Jerry D. Higgins

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzoni A, La Barbera G, Zaninetti A (1995) Analysis and prediction or rockfalls using a mathematical model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 32:709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet G, Giacchetti G, Grimod A (2013) Rockfall barrier behavior under multiple impact events. 64th highway geology symposium, New Hampshire, USA, 9–12 September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • EOTA (2008) ETAG 027: guideline for European technical approval of falling rock protection kits, Brussels. http://www.eota.be

  • Giaccheti G, Zotti IM (2012) Design approach for rockfall barriers. Proceedings of the XI national congress of geotechnic, San José, Costa Rica, 9–10 August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Giani GP (1992) Rock slope stability analysis. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Giani GP (1997) Rockfall. Hevelius Edizioni, Benevento

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimod A, Giacchetti G (2013a) High energy rockfall barriers: a design procedure for different applications. 23rd world mining congress, Montreal, QC, Canada, 11–15 August 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimod A, Giacchetti G (2013b) New design approach for rockfall barriers. EuRock 2013, Wroclaw, Poland, 23–26 September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1986) Rockfall: a computer program for predicting rockfall trajectories. Unpublished internal notes, Golder Associates, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Peila D, Oggeri C, Baratono P (2006) Barriere paramassi a rete. Interventi e dimensionamento. GEAM, Quaderni di studio e di documentazione n26

    Google Scholar 

  • Spang RM (1987) Protection against rockfalls – stepchild in the design or rock slopes. 6th international congress on rock mechanics, Montreal, Canada. pp 551–557

    Google Scholar 

  • UNI (2012) UNI 112111-4: 2012 rockfall protective measures – Part 4: definitive and executive design. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Milano Italia (in Italian). http://www.uni.com

  • WSL (2001) Guideline for the approval of rockfall protection kits. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Berne, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Grimod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grimod, A., Giacchetti, G. (2014). Design Approach for Rockfall Barriers Tested According to ETAG 027. In: Sassa, K., Canuti, P., Yin, Y. (eds) Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04996-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics