Skip to main content

Reflexive Modernization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ulrich Beck

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice ((BRIEFSPIONEER,volume 18))

Abstract

In the 1970s thinkers like Jürgen Habermas, Claus Offe, and James O’Connor raised questions about the legitimacy of social order, especially about the ability of the capitalist state to reconcile the promotion of economic growth and social welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text was first published by: Ino Rossi: “Reflexive Modernization”, in: Ritzer, George (Ed.): The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, Volume IV (Malden, MA—Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2012): 1755–1760. Permission was granted by Prof. Ino Rossi and on 16 September 2013 by Ms. Verity Butler for Blackwell Publishing on behalf of Wiley, UK.

References

  • Beck, Ulrich, 1992: Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, 1994: “The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization”, in: Beck, Ulrich; Giddens, Anthony; Lash, Scott (Eds.): Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press): 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, 1999: World Risk Society (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, 2006: The Cosmopolitan Vision (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, 2010: “Climate for Change, or How to Create a Green Modernity?”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 27,2–3: 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich; Bonss, Wolfgang; Lau, Christoph, 2003: “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization. Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 20,2: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich; Giddens, Anthony; Lash, Scott, 1994: Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich; Willms, Johannes, 2004: Conversations with Ulrich Beck (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavelty, Myriam Dunn; Mauer, Victor, 2009: “Postmodern Intelligence: Strategic Warning in an Age of Reflexive Intelligence”, in: Security Dialogue, 40,2: 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony, 1990: The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony, 1991: Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony, 1994: Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huzar, Eugène, 2008 [1855]: La Fin du Monde par la Science (Alfortville: Ère).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Ino (Ed.), 2008: Frontiers of Globalization Research: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches (New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossi, I. (2014). Reflexive Modernization. In: Beck, U. (eds) Ulrich Beck. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04990-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics