Skip to main content

Credit Scoring: Will Our Digital Identity Replace the Real Person?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation

Part of the book series: Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation ((SEELR,volume 3))

Abstract

When last summer in Germany the news spread that the most important credit agency1 (Schufa) was cooperating with the renowned Hasso Plattner Institute, researching on social networks and their relevance for creditworthiness, there was a public uproar. The then Federal Minister for Consumer Protection, Ms. Aigner, warned that Schufa should not become the consumers’ economic Big Brother. Correlating the data of a credit agency with those of social networks seemed to be quite a delicate matter. Within days the cooperation was ended. Schufa defended the cooperation by claiming that other companies were already using such data available in the internet. The German economic magazine Handelsblatt named a couple of foreign companies that used data from social networks like facebook or twitter to predict creditworthiness. Other companies use data from GPS services or social graphs (likes, friends, posts), the time spent on a particular web site or app or the general smartphone usage to score consumers. In Norway credit scoring also relies on taxable income and tax returns. An American start-up, headed by a former Google chief information officer, which promises to predict consumer behaviour, makes use of Big Data and utilizes 70,000 indicators. Scoring than becomes more and more a specific kind of data mining. It seems that Schufa’s intention for further research is by far not the most problematic aspect of the question and that the use of internet data for consumer scoring is not limited to Germany. Apart from the United States, which has a specific legislation on scoring, there seems to be a certain lack of clarity in international consumer protection with regard to it. The proposed EU regulation on data protection?2, although intended to tackle new technological and international developments, does not deal in specific with scoring. In Germany scoring still is a very sensitive issue for consumer protection. During the Conference of the German Countries (regional) Ministers for Consumer Protection therefore there has been a demand for more legislation, more supervision and more scientific research. The German National Ministry for Consumer Protection in autumn 2013 contracted a study on the latest developments in scoring and the need for further consumer protection legislation.

Deputy Director General for Consumer Protection in Germany

1 Hans Micklitz was not only the Head of the Scientific Advisiory Board of the German Federal Ministry for Consumer Protection for many years but also is a long time member of the Schufa (credit agency) Consumer Protection Committee.

2 Proposal for a Regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation), COM(2012) 11 final.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The credit score found online varies as follows: > 97.5 % very low risk, 95–97.5 % low to comprehensible risk, 90–95 % satisfactory to increased risk, 80–90 % substantially increased to high risk, 50–80 % very high risk, < 50 % critical risk.

  2. 2.

    Stiftung Warentest, ‘Verzerrtes Bild’, (2010) Finanztest 12.

  3. 3.

    P Marowski, Never Let A Serious Crisis Go To Waste (London, Verso, 2013).

  4. 4.

    F Schirrmacher, ‘Wir wollen nicht’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 25/8/2013, 37.

  5. 5.

    (2009) Federal Gazette I 2355.

  6. 6.

    WDR, Schlechte Bonität durch Auskunfteien? 15/4/2013, www.wdr.de

  7. 7.

    AG Hamburg, 27/6/2001, (2001) Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 621.

  8. 8.

    LG Berlin, 27/4/2011, (2011) Verbraucher und Recht 271.

  9. 9.

    LG Munich, 8/8/2012, (2013) Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 135.

  10. 10.

    LG Verden, 13/12/2010, (2011) Verbraucher und Recht 191.

  11. 11.

    LG Potsdam, 10/7/2008, (2008) MultiMedia und Recht 769.

  12. 12.

    LG Oldenburg, 23/12/2009, www.juris.de.

  13. 13.

    KG Berlin, 7/2/2013, (2013) Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 189.

  14. 14.

    LG Wiesbaden, 1/12/2011, (2012) Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 283.

  15. 15.

    OLG Nuremberg, 30/10/2012, (2012) Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 26.

  16. 16.

    LG Berlin, 1/11/2011, (2012) Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 74.

  17. 17.

    OLG Dusseldorf, 9/7/2013, (2013) Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht 1057.

  18. 18.

    Bundesverfassungsgericht, 15/12/1983, (1984) Neue Juristische Wochenzeitschrift 577.

  19. 19.

    Bundesdatenschutzbeauftragter, 22. Tätigkeitsbericht, 36, www.bfdi.bund.de.

  20. 20.

    Bundesdatenschutzbeauftragter, 23.Tätigkeitsbericht, 115, www.bfdi.bund.de.

  21. 21.

    Schufa Ombudsmann, (2012) Tätigkeitsbericht 28, www.schufa-verbraucherbeirat.de/media/obmudsmann/taetigkeitsberichte.

  22. 22.

    [2013] OJ L 165/63.

  23. 23.

    Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein, Erhöhung des Datenschutzniveaus zugunsten der Verbraucher (2006), www.bmelv.bund.de.

  24. 24.

    D Korczak and M Wilken, Studie zum Scoring—Aussagekraft und Anwendung in der Kreditvergabe (Berlin, 2008), www.vzbv.de.

  25. 25.

    D Korczak and M Wilken, Verbraucherinformationen Scoring, 2009, www.bmelv.bund.de.

References

  • Korczak, D and Wilken, M, Studie zum ScoringAussagekraft und Anwendung in der Kreditvergabe (Berlin, 2008), www.vzbv.de.

  • Korczak, D and Wilken, M, Verbraucherinformationen Scoring (2009), www.bmelv.bund.de. Marowski, P, Never Let A Serious Crisis Go To Waste (London, Verso, 2013).

  • Schirrmacher, F, ‘Wir wollen nicht’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 25/8/2013, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiftung Warentest, ‘Verzerrtes Bild’ (2010) Finanztest 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein, Erhöhung des Datenschutzniveaus zugunsten der Verbraucher (2006), www.bmelv.bund.de.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Metz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metz, R. (2014). Credit Scoring: Will Our Digital Identity Replace the Real Person?. In: Purnhagen, K., Rott, P. (eds) Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04903-8_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics