Abstract
The inattention of mathematicians to the argument of probability goes on in the present day. Theorists are inclined to elude the random event analysis so far. For many, the probability theory becomes just a set-measurement theory and the argument of probability could be called an abstract and rather negligible detail in this context (Kallenberg 2002).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Feynman, R., & Hibbs, A. (1965). Quantum mechanics and path integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gilson G. (2013). Unified Theory of Wave-Particle Duality, the Schrödinger Equations, and Quantum Diffraction. arAiv:1103.1922v10.
Green, J. A. (1988). Sets and groups. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Gut, A. (2012). Probability: A graduate course. New York: Springer.
Honderich T. (ed.) (1995). Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
IBM Dictionary. (1994). IBM dictionary of computing. Berkeley: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media.
Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of modern probability. New York: Springer.
Kolmogorov A. (1933). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Springer. Translated as Foundations of the Theory of Probability by Chelsea, (1950).
Vose, D. (2000). Risk analysis: A quantitative guide. Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rocchi, P. (2014). Classical Modeling of the Probability Argument. In: Janus-Faced Probability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04861-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04861-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04860-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04861-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)