Abstract
After having analyzed the different nature of P(A n ) and P(A 1) we are ready to discuss the relationships extant between these parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barron, G., & Leider, S. (2010). The role of experience in the gambler’s fallacy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 117–129.
Chow, S. C. (2011). Controversial statistical issues in clinical trials. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Gill, J. (2002). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Gillies, D. (2000). Varieties of propensity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 807–835.
Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific reasoning (2nd ed.). Chicago: Open Court Press.
Kardaun, O. (2005). Classical methods of statistics. Heidelberg: Springer.
Robert, C. P. (2008). The bayesian choice: From decision–theoretic foundations to computational implementation. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rocchi, P. (2014). About the Compatibility of the Diverging Interpretations. In: Janus-Faced Probability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04861-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04861-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04860-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04861-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)