Skip to main content

Radiographic Service Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Mammography

Abstract

The success of breast cancer diagnosis requires consistent production of high quality mammograms to allow optimal visualisation of breast tissue. It is internationally recognised that the standards required in both screening programmes and symptomatic services need to be regularly monitored and audited. Individual practitioners are also required to regularly monitor and audit their work in order to maintain production of high quality images and allow improved performance of the imaging service [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moreira C, Svoboda K, Poulos A, Taylor R, Page A, Rickard M. Comparison of the validity and reliability of two image classification systems for the assessment of mammogram quality. J Med Screen. 2005;12:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Quality assurance guidelines for mammography, vol. 63. Sheffield: NHSBSP Publication; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The National Quality Management Committee of Breast Screen Australia. National Accreditation Standards: Breast Screen Australia Quality Improvement Programme, Canberra, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee L, Stickland V, Wilson R, Evans A. Fundamentals of mammography. London: Churchill Livingston; 2003. p. 108–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hashimoto BE. Practical digital mammography. New York: Thieme; 2008. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Society of Radiographers. The scope of practice for assistant practitioners in clinical imaging. London: The Society of Radiographers; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Starr L, Mercer C. Peer review – an essential part of learning and development. Symposium Mammographicum, Bournemouth 2014. The Nightingale Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Collecting, monitoring and reporting repeat examinations, vol. 4. Sheffield: NHSBSP Publication No. 4, version 2; 2006. p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline J. Dobson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobson, C.J., Alison, C.S. (2015). Radiographic Service Quality. In: Hogg, P., Kelly, J., Mercer, C. (eds) Digital Mammography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04830-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04831-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics